Literature DB >> 22527311

The effect of test variability on the structure-function relationship in early glaucoma.

Stuart K Gardiner1, Chris A Johnson, Shaban Demirel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether the weakness of the structure-function relationship could be produced by test variability alone, without implying underlying dissociation between the true rates of structural and functional change.
METHODS: Perimetric mean deviation (MD), and rim area (RA) and cup volume (CV) from confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, over six visits, were taken from 166 eyes of 92 participants with high-risk ocular hypertension or suspected/early glaucoma in the Portland Progression Project. Models were created of each measure's variability. A further model predicted the rate of functional change from the rate of structural change. These were used to generate realistic simulated sequences of both functional and structural data with different standard deviations σ between the underlying rates of change. 'Observed' structure-function relationships were calculated. An empirical p-value was derived, equaling the proportion of simulated series for which the 'observed' structure-function dissociation was greater than that seen in patient data.
RESULTS: The correlation between the rates of structural (RA) and functional (MD) change was 0.171, consistent with σ < 0.02 dB/yr. Using CV, the correlation was -0.091, consistent with σ < 0.01 dB/yr. By comparison, the models predicted that the standard deviation of the rate of functional change for a healthy eye due to test variability would be 0.18 dB/yr.
CONCLUSION: Test variability is sufficiently large that realistic patient data can be simulated without requiring a large variability between the underlying rates of structural and functional change. This absence of implied dissociation is a necessary condition for it to be valid to combine structural and functional measures to improve estimates of functional change and/or to reduce perimetric variability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22527311      PMCID: PMC3763816          DOI: 10.1007/s00417-012-2005-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  53 in total

1.  Comparison between Tendency-Oriented Perimetry (TOP) and octopus threshold perimetry.

Authors:  J Morales; M L Weitzman; M González de la Rosa
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Perimetric defects and ganglion cell damage: interpreting linear relations using a two-stage neural model.

Authors:  William H Swanson; Joost Felius; Fei Pan
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from Full Threshold, SITA Standard, and SITA Fast strategies.

Authors:  Paul H Artes; Aiko Iwase; Yuko Ohno; Yoshiaki Kitazawa; Balwantray C Chauhan
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  A new generation of algorithms for computerized threshold perimetry, SITA.

Authors:  B Bengtsson; J Olsson; A Heijl; H Rootzén
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand       Date:  1997-08

5.  Retinal ganglion cell atrophy correlated with automated perimetry in human eyes with glaucoma.

Authors:  H A Quigley; G R Dunkelberger; W R Green
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-05-15       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.

Authors:  Brad Fortune; Shaban Demirel; Xian Zhang; Donald C Hood; Emily Patterson; Annisa Jamil; Steven L Mansberger; George A Cioffi; Chris A Johnson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Glaucoma and vasospasm.

Authors:  D C Broadway; S M Drance
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Reducing noise in suspected glaucomatous visual fields by using a new spatial filter.

Authors:  Stuart K Gardiner; David P Crabb; Fred W Fitzke; Roger A Hitchings
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Risk factors for open-angle glaucoma. The Barbados Eye Study.

Authors:  M C Leske; A M Connell; S Y Wu; L G Hyman; A P Schachat
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-07

10.  Factors for glaucoma progression and the effect of treatment: the early manifest glaucoma trial.

Authors:  M Cristina Leske; Anders Heijl; Mohamed Hussein; Bo Bengtsson; Leslie Hyman; Eugene Komaroff
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-01
View more
  14 in total

1.  Evaluation of Visual Field and Imaging Outcomes for Glaucoma Clinical Trials (An American Ophthalomological Society Thesis).

Authors:  David F Garway-Heath; Ana Quartilho; Philip Prah; David P Crabb; Qian Cheng; Haogang Zhu
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2017-08-22

2.  Localized Changes in Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness as a Predictor of Localized Functional Change in Glaucoma.

Authors:  Stuart K Gardiner; Brad Fortune; Shaban Demirel
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Reducing variability in visual field assessment for glaucoma through filtering that combines structural and functional information.

Authors:  Lisha Deng; Shaban Demirel; Stuart K Gardiner
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Effect of a variability-adjusted algorithm on the efficiency of perimetric testing.

Authors:  Stuart K Gardiner
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  A method to estimate the amount of neuroretinal rim tissue in glaucoma: comparison with current methods for measuring rim area.

Authors:  Stuart K Gardiner; Ruojin Ren; Hongli Yang; Brad Fortune; Claude F Burgoyne; Shaban Demirel
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Anterior lamina cribrosa surface depth, age, and visual field sensitivity in the Portland Progression Project.

Authors:  Ruojin Ren; Hongli Yang; Stuart K Gardiner; Brad Fortune; Christy Hardin; Shaban Demirel; Claude F Burgoyne
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Assessment of the reliability of standard automated perimetry in regions of glaucomatous damage.

Authors:  Stuart K Gardiner; William H Swanson; Deborah Goren; Steven L Mansberger; Shaban Demirel
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Bruch's membrane opening-minimum rim width and visual field loss in glaucoma: a broken stick analysis.

Authors:  Keun-Heung Park; Ji-Woong Lee; Jin-Mi Kim; Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi; Joseph Caprioli
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 1.779

9.  Structure-function relationship between Bruch's membrane opening-minimum rim width and perimetry in open-angle glaucoma subtypes.

Authors:  Ruoshi Li; Xia Wang; Yahui Wei; Yuan Fang; Tian Tian; Mei Li; Yu Cai; Yingzi Pan
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Contrast-to-Noise Ratios for Assessing the Detection of Progression in the Various Stages of Glaucoma.

Authors:  Juleke E A Majoor; Koenraad A Vermeer; Eleni-Rosalina Andrinopoulou; Hans G Lemij
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 3.283

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.