Literature DB >> 22526955

PET/MR imaging of bone lesions--implications for PET quantification from imperfect attenuation correction.

Andrei Samarin1, Cyrill Burger, Scott D Wollenweber, David W Crook, Irene A Burger, Daniel T Schmid, Gustav K von Schulthess, Felix P Kuhn.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Accurate attenuation correction (AC) is essential for quantitative analysis of PET tracer distribution. In MR, the lack of cortical bone signal makes bone segmentation difficult and may require implementation of special sequences. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the need for accurate bone segmentation in MR-based AC for whole-body PET/MR imaging.
METHODS: In 22 patients undergoing sequential PET/CT and 3-T MR imaging, modified CT AC maps were produced by replacing pixels with values of >100 HU, representing mostly bone structures, by pixels with a constant value of 36 HU corresponding to soft tissue, thereby simulating current MR-derived AC maps. A total of 141 FDG-positive osseous lesions and 50 soft-tissue lesions adjacent to bones were evaluated. The mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean) was measured in each lesion in PET images reconstructed once using the standard AC maps and once using the modified AC maps. Subsequently, the errors in lesion tracer uptake for the modified PET images were calculated using the standard PET image as a reference.
RESULTS: Substitution of bone by soft tissue values in AC maps resulted in an underestimation of tracer uptake in osseous and soft tissue lesions adjacent to bones of 11.2 ± 5.4% (range 1.5-30.8%) and 3.2 ± 1.7% (range 0.2-4%), respectively. Analysis of the spine and pelvic osseous lesions revealed a substantial dependence of the error on lesion composition. For predominantly sclerotic spine lesions, the mean underestimation was 15.9 ± 3.4% (range 9.9-23.5%) and for osteolytic spine lesions, 7.2 ± 1.7% (range 4.9-9.3%), respectively.
CONCLUSION: CT data simulating treating bone as soft tissue as is currently done in MR maps for PET AC leads to a substantial underestimation of tracer uptake in bone lesions and depends on lesion composition, the largest error being seen in sclerotic lesions. Therefore, depiction of cortical bone and other calcified areas in MR AC maps is necessary for accurate quantification of tracer uptake values in PET/MR imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22526955     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-012-2113-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  14 in total

Review 1.  Clinical ultrashort echo time imaging of bone and other connective tissues.

Authors:  Matthew D Robson; Graeme M Bydder
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.044

2.  MR-based attenuation correction for torso-PET/MR imaging: pitfalls in mapping MR to CT data.

Authors:  Thomas Beyer; Markus Weigert; Harald H Quick; Uwe Pietrzyk; Florian Vogt; Christoph Palm; Gerald Antoch; Stefan P Müller; Andreas Bockisch
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  Towards quantitative PET/MRI: a review of MR-based attenuation correction techniques.

Authors:  Matthias Hofmann; Bernd Pichler; Bernhard Schölkopf; Thomas Beyer
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Repeatability of FDG quantification in tumor imaging: averaged SUVs are superior to SUVmax.

Authors:  Irene A Burger; Dominic M Huser; Cyrill Burger; Gustav K von Schulthess; Alfred Buck
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 2.408

5.  MRI-based attenuation correction for PET/MRI using ultrashort echo time sequences.

Authors:  Vincent Keereman; Yves Fierens; Tom Broux; Yves De Deene; Max Lonneux; Stefaan Vandenberghe
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Toward implementing an MRI-based PET attenuation-correction method for neurologic studies on the MR-PET brain prototype.

Authors:  Ciprian Catana; Andre van der Kouwe; Thomas Benner; Christian J Michel; Michael Hamm; Matthias Fenchel; Bruce Fischl; Bruce Rosen; Matthias Schmand; A Gregory Sorensen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Value of a Dixon-based MR/PET attenuation correction sequence for the localization and evaluation of PET-positive lesions.

Authors:  Matthias Eiber; Axel Martinez-Möller; Michael Souvatzoglou; Konstantin Holzapfel; Anja Pickhard; Dennys Löffelbein; Ivan Santi; Ernst J Rummeny; Sibylle Ziegler; Markus Schwaiger; Stephan G Nekolla; Ambros J Beer
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-06-18       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Repeatability of SUV measurements in serial PET.

Authors:  J Schwartz; J L Humm; M Gonen; H Kalaigian; H Schoder; S M Larson; S A Nehmeh
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Tissue classification as a potential approach for attenuation correction in whole-body PET/MRI: evaluation with PET/CT data.

Authors:  Axel Martinez-Möller; Michael Souvatzoglou; Gaspar Delso; Ralph A Bundschuh; Christophe Chefd'hotel; Sibylle I Ziegler; Nassir Navab; Markus Schwaiger; Stephan G Nekolla
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  PET attenuation coefficients from CT images: experimental evaluation of the transformation of CT into PET 511-keV attenuation coefficients.

Authors:  C Burger; G Goerres; S Schoenes; A Buck; A H R Lonn; G K Von Schulthess
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2002-04-19       Impact factor: 9.236

View more
  78 in total

1.  Imaging large vessel vasculitis with fully integrated PET/MRI: a pilot study.

Authors:  Ingo Einspieler; Klaus Thürmel; Thomas Pyka; Matthias Eiber; Sabine Wolfram; Philipp Moog; Christian Reeps; Markus Essler
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Zero-Echo-Time and Dixon Deep Pseudo-CT (ZeDD CT): Direct Generation of Pseudo-CT Images for Pelvic PET/MRI Attenuation Correction Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks with Multiparametric MRI.

Authors:  Andrew P Leynes; Jaewon Yang; Florian Wiesinger; Sandeep S Kaushik; Dattesh D Shanbhag; Youngho Seo; Thomas A Hope; Peder E Z Larson
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  PET/MR brain imaging: evaluation of clinical UTE-based attenuation correction.

Authors:  Lars Birger Aasheim; Anna Karlberg; Pål Erik Goa; Asta Håberg; Sveinung Sørhaug; Unn-Merete Fagerli; Live Eikenes
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  mDixon-Based Synthetic CT Generation for PET Attenuation Correction on Abdomen and Pelvis Jointly Using Transfer Fuzzy Clustering and Active Learning-Based Classification.

Authors:  Pengjiang Qian; Yangyang Chen; Jung-Wen Kuo; Yu-Dong Zhang; Yizhang Jiang; Kaifa Zhao; Rose Al Helo; Harry Friel; Atallah Baydoun; Feifei Zhou; Jin Uk Heo; Norbert Avril; Karin Herrmann; Rodney Ellis; Bryan Traughber; Robert S Jones; Shitong Wang; Kuan-Hao Su; Raymond F Muzic
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 5.  Clinical oncologic applications of PET/MRI: a new horizon.

Authors:  Sasan Partovi; Andres Kohan; Christian Rubbert; Jose Luis Vercher-Conejero; Chiara Gaeta; Roger Yuh; Lisa Zipp; Karin A Herrmann; Mark R Robbin; Zhenghong Lee; Raymond F Muzic; Peter Faulhaber; Pablo R Ros
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-03-20

6.  Do myocardial PET-MR and PET-CT FDG images provide comparable information?

Authors:  Jorge D Oldan; Shetal N Shah; Richard C Brunken; Frank P DiFilippo; Nancy A Obuchowski; Michael A Bolen
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-06-13       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Quantitative simultaneous positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jinsong Ouyang; Yoann Petibon; Chuan Huang; Timothy G Reese; Aleksandra L Kolnick; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-11-03

8.  Summary of the First ISMRM-SNMMI Workshop on PET/MRI: Applications and Limitations.

Authors:  Thomas A Hope; Zahi A Fayad; Kathryn J Fowler; Dawn Holley; Andrei Iagaru; Alan B McMillan; Patrick Veit-Haiback; Robert J Witte; Greg Zaharchuk; Ciprian Catana
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 9.  Positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance imaging: technical review.

Authors:  Raymond F Muzic; Frank P DiFilippo
Journal:  Semin Roentgenol       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 0.800

Review 10.  MR Imaging-Guided Attenuation Correction of PET Data in PET/MR Imaging.

Authors:  David Izquierdo-Garcia; Ciprian Catana
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2016-01-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.