Literature DB >> 22526160

External validity of the Tokuhashi score in patients with vertebral metastasis.

Alberto Hernandez-Fernandez1, Roberto Vélez, Ana Lersundi-Artamendi, Ferrán Pellisé.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To calculate the accuracy of the Tokuhashi score (TS) in recent patients with vertebral metastasis (VM), candidates or not to surgical treatment, and thus to assess the external validity of TS.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 90 patients (55 men, 35 women) with VM between 2004 and 2006. For each patient, data on the primary tumor (PT), date of diagnosis, TS at the time of VM diagnosis and date of death were retrieved from the electronic medical records and civil registry. True survival time and TS survival time were estimated to calculate the accuracy rate of the TS. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to study the survival function by prognostic groups. A correlation study between survival time and other variables was performed.
RESULTS: PT distribution was as follows: breast (22.2 %), lung (20 %), prostate (17.8 %), rectum (10 %), unknown (11 %), and others (18 %). Average overall survival after the VM diagnosis was 11.8 months (SD, 11 m): breast, 20 months (SD, 20 m); lung, 5.8 months (SD, 5.9 m); prostate, 14.5 months (SD, 13.4 m); rectum, 9.4 months (SD, 9.3); and unknown tumors, 2.7 months (SD, 5 m). Survival time was accurately predicted with the TS in 63 % of patients with a short life expectancy (survival, <6 months; TS, 0-8), 16 % of patients in the intermediate group (survival, 6-12 months; TS, 9-11), and 77 % of patients with a good prognosis (survival >12 months; TS, 12-15). By specific PT, the accuracy rate of the TS was low for breast cancer metastasis (35 %). The Kaplan-Meier curves show a significant separation among the prognostic groups (p < 0.05), but the log-rank test showed a statistically significant difference in survival only between short expectancy group and good prognostic group. Age at PT diagnosis and at VM diagnosis negatively correlated with survival (r = 0.22; p = 0.032 and r = 0.3, p = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: The TS was not highly accurate for predicting survival in patients with VM, treated or not surgically, and it was particularly imprecise in patients with an intermediate score (9-11 points) and those with breast cancer, so it is possible that the TS currently has a poor external validity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22526160     DOI: 10.1007/s00432-012-1222-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0171-5216            Impact factor:   4.553


  39 in total

1.  Vertebral metastases: a critical appreciation of the preoperative prognostic tokuhashi score in a series of 71 cases.

Authors:  E A Enkaoua; L Doursounian; G Chatellier; F Mabesoone; T Aimard; G Saillant
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  External validity: the neglected dimension in evidence ranking.

Authors:  Navindra Persaud; Muhammad M Mamdani
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.431

3.  Evaluation of oral chemotherapy with capecitabine and cyclophosphamide plus thalidomide and prednisone in prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Li-Juan Meng; Jun Wang; Wei-Fei Fan; Xiao-Lin Pu; Fu-Yin Liu; Min Yang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Predictive value of Tokuhashi scoring systems in spinal metastases, focusing on various primary tumor groups: evaluation of 448 patients in the Aarhus spinal metastases database.

Authors:  Miao Wang; Cody Eric Bünger; Haisheng Li; Chunsen Wu; Kristian Høy; Bent Niedermann; Peter Helmig; Yu Wang; Anders Bonde Jensen; Katrin Schättiger; Ebbe Stender Hansen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Surgical management of symptomatic spinal metastases. Postoperative outcome and quality of life.

Authors:  B Weigel; M Maghsudi; C Neumann; R Kretschmer; F J Müller; M Nerlich
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Survival prognostic factors and clinical outcomes in patients with spinal metastases.

Authors:  Vincent Pointillart; Jean-Marc Vital; Rachid Salmi; Abou Diallo; Gerald M Quan
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-09-04       Impact factor: 4.553

7.  Scoring system for the preoperative evaluation of metastatic spine tumor prognosis.

Authors:  Y Tokuhashi; H Matsuzaki; S Toriyama; H Kawano; S Ohsaka
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Complication, survival rates, and risk factors of surgery for metastatic disease of the spine.

Authors:  J J Wise; J S Fischgrund; H N Herkowitz; D Montgomery; L T Kurz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 9.  Current place of high-dose irinotecan chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Mohamed Hebbar; Marc Ychou; Michel Ducreux
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 4.553

10.  Metastatic bone disease from occult carcinoma: a profile.

Authors:  M Nottebaert; G U Exner; A R von Hochstetter; A Schreiber
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.075

View more
  11 in total

1.  Accuracy of Tokuhashi score system in predicting survival of lung cancer patients with vertebral metastasis.

Authors:  Wenxi Yu; Lina Tang; Feng Lin; Yang Yao; Zan Shen
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 2.  The Tokuhashi score: effectiveness and pitfalls.

Authors:  Carmine Zoccali; Jesse Skoch; Christina M Walter; Mohammad Torabi; Mark Borgstrom; Ali A Baaj
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Tokuhashi score is predictive of survival in a cohort of patients undergoing surgery for renal cell carcinoma spinal metastases.

Authors:  Rory J Petteys; Steven M Spitz; Jay Rhee; C Rory Goodwin; Patricia L Zadnik; Rachel Sarabia-Estrada; Mari L Groves; Ali Bydon; Timothy F Witham; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Ziya L Gokaslan; Daniel M Sciubba
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Scoring system for prediction of metastatic spine tumor prognosis.

Authors:  Yasuaki Tokuhashi; Hiroshi Uei; Masashi Oshima; Yasumitsu Ajiro
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-07-18

5.  [Solitary spinal metastases. Is aggressive surgical management justified?].

Authors:  C Druschel; A C Disch; M Pumberger; P Schwabe; I Melcher; N P Haas; K-D Schaser
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Prognostic Scoring System Development for Malignant Spinal Cord Compression.

Authors:  Chaichana Chantharakhit; Nantapa Sujaritvanichpong
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2022-02-01

7.  Usefulness of Tokuhashi Score in Survival Prediction of Patients Operated for Vertebral Metastatic Disease.

Authors:  Marcelo Gruenberg; Maximiliano E Mereles; Gastón O Camino Willhuber; Marcelo Valacco; Matias G Petracchi; Carlos A Solá
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-04-11

Review 8.  Classification and scoring systems for metastatic spine tumors: a literature review.

Authors:  Yasuaki Tokuhashi; Hiroshi Uei; Masashi Oshima
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2017-12-20

9.  Analysis of the predictive role and new proposal for surgical strategies based on the modified Tomita and Tokuhashi scoring systems for spinal metastasis.

Authors:  Junhyung Kim; Sun-Ho Lee; Se-Jun Park; Sung-Soo Chung; Eun-Sang Kim; Whan Eoh; Chong-Suh Lee
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 10.  The Role of Prognostic Scoring Systems in Assessing Surgical Candidacy for Patients With Vertebral Metastasis: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  John Tristan Cassidy; Joseph F Baker; Brian Lenehan
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2018-01-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.