Literature DB >> 22521659

Spatial-frequency requirements for reading revisited.

MiYoung Kwon1, Gordon E Legge.   

Abstract

Blur is one of many visual factors that can limit reading in both normal and low vision. Legge et al. [Legge, G. E., Pelli, D. G., Rubin, G. S., & Schleske, M. M. (1985). Psychophysics of reading. I. Normal vision. Vision Research, 25, 239-252.] measured reading speed for text that was low-pass filtered with a range of cutoff spatial frequencies. Above 2cycles per letter (CPL) reading speed was constant at its maximum level, but decreased rapidly for lower cutoff frequencies. It remains unknown why the critical cutoff for reading speed is near 2 CPL. The goal of the current study was to ask whether the spatial-frequency requirement for rapid reading is related to the effects of cutoff frequency on letter recognition and the size of the visual span. Visual span profiles were measured by asking subjects to recognize letters in trigrams (random strings of three letters) flashed for 150ms at varying letter positions left and right of the fixation point. Reading speed was measured with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP). The size of the visual span and reading speed were measured for low-pass filtered stimuli with cutoff frequencies from 0.8 to 8 CPL. Low-pass letter recognition data, obtained under similar testing conditions, were available from our previous study (Kwon & Legge, 2011). We found that the spatial-frequency requirement for reading is very similar to the spatial-frequency requirements for the size of the visual span and single letter recognition. The critical cutoff frequencies for reading speed, the size of the visual span and a contrast-invariant measure of letter recognition were all near 1.4 CPL, which is lower than the previous estimate of 2 CPL for reading speed. Although correlational in nature, these results are consistent with the hypothesis that the size of the visual span is closely linked to reading speed.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22521659      PMCID: PMC3653576          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.03.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  19 in total

1.  Psychophysics of reading. XX. Linking letter recognition to reading speed in central and peripheral vision.

Authors:  G E Legge; J S Mansfield; S T Chung
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Psychophysics of reading. XI. Comparing color contrast and luminance contrast.

Authors:  G E Legge; D H Parish; A Luebker; L H Wurm
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  Psychophysics of reading. VIII. The Minnesota Low-Vision Reading Test.

Authors:  G E Legge; J A Ross; A Luebker; J M LaMay
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

5.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies.

Authors:  D G Pelli
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

6.  Psychophysics of reading--V. The role of contrast in normal vision.

Authors:  G E Legge; G S Rubin; A Luebker
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Psychophysics of reading--I. Normal vision.

Authors:  G E Legge; D G Pelli; G S Rubin; M M Schleske
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Spatial-frequency cutoff requirements for pattern recognition in central and peripheral vision.

Authors:  Miyoung Kwon; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Mr. Chips 2002: new insights from an ideal-observer model of reading.

Authors:  Gordon E Legge; Thomas A Hooven; Timothy S Klitz; J Stephen Stephen Mansfield; Bosco S Tjan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  The remarkable inefficiency of word recognition.

Authors:  Denis G Pelli; Bart Farell; Deborah C Moore
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-06-12       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  14 in total

1.  Slow Reading in Glaucoma: Is it due to the Shrinking Visual Span in Central Vision?

Authors:  MiYoung Kwon; Rong Liu; Bhavika N Patel; Christopher Girkin
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Comparing the minimum spatial-frequency content for recognizing Chinese and alphabet characters.

Authors:  Hui Wang; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  The Effect of Diquafosol Ophthalmic Solution on Clinical Parameters and Visual Function in Soft Contact Lens-Related Dry Eye.

Authors:  Tomohiro Ogami; Hiroki Asano; Takahiro Hiraoka; Yoshiaki Yamada; Tetsuro Oshika
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 3.845

4.  Zebra Stripes through the Eyes of Their Predators, Zebras, and Humans.

Authors:  Amanda D Melin; Donald W Kline; Chihiro Hiramatsu; Tim Caro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Perceptual and Cognitive Factors Imposing "Speed Limits" on Reading Rate: A Study with the Rapid Serial Visual Presentation.

Authors:  Silvia Primativo; Donatella Spinelli; Pierluigi Zoccolotti; Maria De Luca; Marialuisa Martelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Integrating oculomotor and perceptual training to induce a pseudofovea: A model system for studying central vision loss.

Authors:  Rong Liu; MiYoung Kwon
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Effects of Spatial Frequencies on Word Identification by Fast and Slow Readers: Evidence from Eye Movements.

Authors:  Timothy R Jordan; Jasmine Dixon; Victoria A McGowan; Stoyan Kurtev; Kevin B Paterson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-09-28

8.  Age-related changes in crowding and reading speed.

Authors:  Rong Liu; Bhavika N Patel; MiYoung Kwon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Does the mean adequately represent reading performance? Evidence from a cross-linguistic study.

Authors:  Chiara V Marinelli; Joanna K Horne; Sarah P McGeown; Pierluigi Zoccolotti; Marialuisa Martelli
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-08-19

10.  Compensation for Blur Requires Increase in Field of View and Viewing Time.

Authors:  MiYoung Kwon; Rong Liu; Lillian Chien
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.