Literature DB >> 22521386

Acute surgical treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation type V with a hook plate: superiority to late reconstruction.

Johan von Heideken1, Helena Boström Windhamre, Viveka Une-Larsson, Anders Ekelund.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Outcomes for patients with acromioclavicular joint dislocation, Rockwood type V, treated with acute or delayed hook plate surgery were investigated.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients treated with a hook plate for acromioclavicular joint dislocation, Rockwood type V, were retrospectively evaluated 1 to 8 years after the injury. Of 41 patients, 37 were re-evaluated, 32 in person and 5 by telephone or letter. The acute surgery group comprised 22 patients operated on with a hook plate within 4 weeks after the injury. The delayed surgery group comprised 15 patients, with unacceptable pain or functional disability after a minimum of 4 months of conservative treatment, who were operated on with modified Weaver-Dunn procedure augmented with a hook plate. The evaluation was based on radiographs, registration of activity level, and shoulder function.
RESULTS: The median Constant Score was 91 for the acute surgery group and 85 for the delayed surgery group (P = .097). The acutely treated patients had better outcomes according to the median Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI; P = .006), shortened version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH; P = .002), and Subjective Shoulder Value (P = .032). The acutely treated patients had less pain in their injured shoulder during rest (P = .014) and during movement (P = .005). There was a significant difference in subluxation between the groups in favor of the acute group, shown by weighted radiographs (P = .011), but no significant relation between subluxation on the weighted radiographs and the shoulder function according to Constant Score at follow-up (r(s) = .122, P = .619).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with acute surgery had a more satisfactory outcome than those with late surgery after failed conservative treatment.
Copyright © 2013 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22521386     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  23 in total

1.  Anatomic and non-anatomic reconstruction improves post-operative outcomes in chronic acromio-clavicular instability: a systematic review.

Authors:  Francisco Xará-Leite; Renato Andrade; Pedro Silva Moreira; Luís Coutinho; Olufemi R Ayeni; Nuno Sevivas; João Espregueira-Mendes
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Why does minimally invasive coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction using a flip button repair technique fail? An analysis of risk factors and complications.

Authors:  Benedikt Schliemann; Steffen B Roßlenbroich; Kristian N Schneider; Christina Theisen; Wolf Petersen; Michael J Raschke; André Weimann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Unstable acromioclavicular joint injuries: Is there really a difference between surgical management in the acute or chronic setting?

Authors:  Luis Natera Cisneros; Juan Sarasquete Reiriz
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2016-10-25

4.  Short-term outcomes of arthroscopic TightRope® fixation are better than hook plate fixation in acute unstable acromioclavicular joint dislocations.

Authors:  Hamid Rahmatullah Bin Abd Razak; Eng-Meng Nicholas Yeo; William Yeo; Tijauw-Tjoen Denny Lie
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-12-09

Review 5.  Comparison of the outcome of early and delayed surgical treatment of complete acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Tengfei Song; Xu Yan; Tianwen Ye
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Effects of hook plate on shoulder function after treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Chang-Hong Chen; Qi-Rong Dong; Rong-Kui Zhou; Hua-Qing Zhen; Ya-Jun Jiao
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-09-15

7.  Performance characteristics of the verbal QuickDASH.

Authors:  Daniel A London; Jeffrey G Stepan; Martin I Boyer; Ryan P Calfee
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 2.230

8.  Surgical treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations: hook plate versus minimally invasive reconstruction.

Authors:  S Metzlaff; S Rosslenbroich; P H Forkel; B Schliemann; H Arshad; M Raschke; W Petersen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Comparison of results between hook plate fixation and ligament reconstruction for acute unstable acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Jong Pil Yoon; Byoung-Joo Lee; Sang Jin Nam; Seok Won Chung; Won-Ju Jeong; Woo-Kie Min; Joo Han Oh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2015-02-10

10.  Surgical treatment of chronic acromioclavicular joint dislocation with autogenous tendon grafts.

Authors:  Kaisa J Virtanen; Vesa Savolainen; Ilkka Tulikoura; Ville Remes; Ville Haapamäki; Jarkko Pajarinen; Jan-Magnus Björkenheim; Mika Paavola
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-08-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.