Beau Blois1. 1. Colchester Regional Hospital, Truro, NS. beau.blois@dal.ca
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of an office-based, family physician–administered ultrasound examination to screen for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). DESIGN: A prospective observational study. Consecutive patients were approached by nonphysician staff. SETTING: Rural family physician offices in Grand Forks and Revelstoke, BC. PARTICIPANTS: The Canadian Society for Vascular Surgery screening recommendations for AAA were used to help select patients who were at risk of AAA. All men 65 years of age or older were included. Women 65 years of age or older were included if they were current smokers or had diabetes, hypertension, a history of coronary artery disease, or a family history of AAA. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A focused “quick screen”, which measured the maximal diameter of the abdominal aorta using point-of-care ultrasound technology, was performed in the office by a resident physician trained in emergency ultrasonography. Each patient was then booked for a criterion standard scan (i.e., a conventional abdominal ultrasound scan performed by a technician and interpreted by a radiologist). The maximal abdominal aortic diameter measured by ultrasound in the office was compared with that measured by the criterion standard method. The time to screen each patient was recorded. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were included in data analysis; 62% of participants were men. The mean age was 73 years. The mean pairwise difference between the office-based ultrasound scan and the criterion standard scan was not statistically significant. The mean absolute difference between the 2 scans was 0.20 cm (95% CI 0.15 to 0.25 cm). Correlation between the scans was 0.81. The office-based ultrasound scan had both a sensitivity and a specificity of 100%. The mean time to screen each patient was 212 seconds (95% CI 194 to 230 seconds). CONCLUSION: Abdominal aortic aneurysm screening can be safely performed in the office by family physicians who are trained to use point-of- care ultrasound technology. The screening test can be completed within the time constraints of a busy family practice office visit. The benefit of screening for AAA in rural patients might be great if local diagnostic ultrasound service and emergent transport to a vascular surgeon are not available.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of an office-based, family physician–administered ultrasound examination to screen for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). DESIGN: A prospective observational study. Consecutive patients were approached by nonphysician staff. SETTING: Rural family physician offices in Grand Forks and Revelstoke, BC. PARTICIPANTS: The Canadian Society for Vascular Surgery screening recommendations for AAA were used to help select patients who were at risk of AAA. All men 65 years of age or older were included. Women 65 years of age or older were included if they were current smokers or had diabetes, hypertension, a history of coronary artery disease, or a family history of AAA. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A focused “quick screen”, which measured the maximal diameter of the abdominal aorta using point-of-care ultrasound technology, was performed in the office by a resident physician trained in emergency ultrasonography. Each patient was then booked for a criterion standard scan (i.e., a conventional abdominal ultrasound scan performed by a technician and interpreted by a radiologist). The maximal abdominal aortic diameter measured by ultrasound in the office was compared with that measured by the criterion standard method. The time to screen each patient was recorded. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were included in data analysis; 62% of participants were men. The mean age was 73 years. The mean pairwise difference between the office-based ultrasound scan and the criterion standard scan was not statistically significant. The mean absolute difference between the 2 scans was 0.20 cm (95% CI 0.15 to 0.25 cm). Correlation between the scans was 0.81. The office-based ultrasound scan had both a sensitivity and a specificity of 100%. The mean time to screen each patient was 212 seconds (95% CI 194 to 230 seconds). CONCLUSION:Abdominal aortic aneurysm screening can be safely performed in the office by family physicians who are trained to use point-of- care ultrasound technology. The screening test can be completed within the time constraints of a busy family practice office visit. The benefit of screening for AAA in rural patients might be great if local diagnostic ultrasound service and emergent transport to a vascular surgeon are not available.
Authors: H J Pleumeekers; A W Hoes; P G Mulder; E van der Does; A Hofman; J S Laméris; D E Grobbee Journal: J Med Screen Date: 1998 Impact factor: 2.136
Authors: Margaret S Lesjak; Stephen C Flecknoe-Brown; Jan R Sidford; Kerryn Payne; John P Fletcher; David M Lyle Journal: Aust J Rural Health Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 1.662
Authors: H A Ashton; M J Buxton; N E Day; L G Kim; T M Marteau; R A P Scott; S G Thompson; N M Walker Journal: Lancet Date: 2002-11-16 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Thomas Y Lee; Peter Korn; Jennifer A Heller; Sashi Kilaru; Frederick P Beavers; Harry L Bush; K Craig Kent Journal: Surgery Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: F A Lederle; S E Wilson; G R Johnson; D B Reinke; F N Littooy; C W Acher; L M Messina; D J Ballard; H J Ansel Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 1995-06 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Camilla Aakjær Andersen; Sinead Holden; Jonathan Vela; Michael Skovdal Rathleff; Martin Bach Jensen Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Jon Steller; Bianca Russell; Shahram Lotfipour; Graciela Maldonado; Tim Siepel; Halsey Jakle; Stacy Hata; Alan Chiem; John Christian Fox Journal: West J Emerg Med Date: 2014-01-09