Literature DB >> 24025903

Clostridium difficile genotypes in piglet populations in Germany.

Alexander Schneeberg1, Heinrich Neubauer, Gernot Schmoock, Sylvia Baier, Jürgen Harlizius, Hendrik Nienhoff, Katja Brase, Stefan Zimmermann, Christian Seyboldt.   

Abstract

Clostridium difficile was isolated from 147 of 201 (73%) rectal swabs of piglets from 15 farms of Lower Saxony and North Rhine-Westphalia. In 14 farms, 14 to 100% (mean, 78%) of the animals tested were culture positive. The rate of isolation was 68% postpartum, increased to 94% in animals 2 to 14 days of age, and declined to 0% for animals 49 days of age and older. There was no link between isolation and antibiotic treatment or diarrhea of piglets. Strains were assigned to 10 PCR ribotypes, and up to 4 PCR ribotypes were found to be present at the same time on a farm. The closely related PCR ribotypes 078 (55%) and 126 (20%) were most frequently recovered and were present in 13 of the 14 positive farms. The comparison of multilocus VNTR (variable number of tandem repeats) analysis (MLVA) data from this study and previously published data on human, porcine, and bovine PCR ribotype 078 isolates from 5 European countries revealed genetic differences between strains of different geographic origin and confirmed the relatedness of human and porcine C. difficile isolates. This study demonstrated that the human-pathogenic PCR ribotypes 078 and 126 are predominant in piglets in Germany. The results suggest that presence of C. difficile is correlated with animal age but not with antibiotic treatment or clinical disease. MLVA indicated that strains of the same geographical origin are often genetically related and corroborated the hypothesis of a close epidemiological connection between human and porcine C. difficile isolates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24025903      PMCID: PMC3889769          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01440-13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  39 in total

1.  Emergence of Clostridium difficile infection due to a new hypervirulent strain, polymerase chain reaction ribotype 078.

Authors:  Abraham Goorhuis; Dennis Bakker; Jeroen Corver; Sylvia B Debast; Celine Harmanus; Daan W Notermans; Aldert A Bergwerff; Frido W Dekker; Ed J Kuijper
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Comparative phylogenomics of Clostridium difficile reveals clade specificity and microevolution of hypervirulent strains.

Authors:  R A Stabler; D N Gerding; J G Songer; D Drudy; J S Brazier; H T Trinh; A A Witney; J Hinds; B W Wren
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 3.  Clostridium difficile: an important pathogen of food animals.

Authors:  J Glenn Songer; Michael A Anderson
Journal:  Anaerobe       Date:  2005-10-25       Impact factor: 3.331

Review 4.  The comparative pathology of Clostridium difficile-associated disease.

Authors:  M K Keel; J G Songer
Journal:  Vet Pathol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.221

5.  Typing and subtyping of Clostridium difficile isolates by using multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis.

Authors:  Renate J van den Berg; Inge Schaap; Kate E Templeton; Corné H W Klaassen; Ed J Kuijper
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-12-13       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Evaluation of two enzyme immunoassays for detection of Clostridium difficile toxins A and B in swine.

Authors:  Michael A Anderson; J Glenn Songer
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 3.293

7.  Isolation of Clostridium difficile from food animals in Slovenia.

Authors:  Tina Pirs; Matjaz Ocepek; Maja Rupnik
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.472

8.  Prevalence of PCR ribotypes among Clostridium difficile isolates from pigs, calves, and other species.

Authors:  Kevin Keel; Jon S Brazier; Karen W Post; Scott Weese; J Glenn Songer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Clostridium difficile PCR ribotype 078 toxinotype V found in diarrhoeal pigs identical to isolates from affected humans.

Authors:  Sylvia B Debast; Leo A M G van Leengoed; Abraham Goorhuis; Celine Harmanus; Ed J Kuijper; Aldert A Bergwerff
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.491

10.  Characterization of Clostridium difficile isolates using capillary gel electrophoresis-based PCR ribotyping.

Authors:  A Indra; S Huhulescu; M Schneeweis; P Hasenberger; S Kernbichler; A Fiedler; G Wewalka; F Allerberger; E J Kuijper
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.472

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Clostridium difficile in Food and Animals: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  C Rodriguez; B Taminiau; J Van Broeck; M Delmée; G Daube
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 2.  The Intersection Between Colonization Resistance, Antimicrobial Stewardship, and Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Rossana Rosa; Curtis J Donskey; L Silvia Munoz-Price
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 3.725

3.  The emergence of Clostridium difficile PCR-ribotype 001 in Slovakia.

Authors:  O Nyc; M Krutova; A Liskova; J Matejkova; J Drabek; E J Kuijper
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2015-05-17       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  DNA microarray-based PCR ribotyping of Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Alexander Schneeberg; Ralf Ehricht; Peter Slickers; Vico Baier; Heinrich Neubauer; Stefan Zimmermann; Denise Rabold; Antina Lübke-Becker; Christian Seyboldt
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Nationwide surveillance study of Clostridium difficile in Australian neonatal pigs shows high prevalence and heterogeneity of PCR ribotypes.

Authors:  Daniel R Knight; Michele M Squire; Thomas V Riley
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 6.  Understanding Clostridium difficile Colonization.

Authors:  Monique J T Crobach; Jonathan J Vernon; Vivian G Loo; Ling Yuan Kong; Séverine Péchiné; Mark H Wilcox; Ed J Kuijper
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 7.  Clostridium (Clostridioides) difficile in animals.

Authors:  J Scott Weese
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 1.279

8.  Whole genome sequencing reveals potential spread of Clostridium difficile between humans and farm animals in the Netherlands, 2002 to 2011.

Authors:  C W Knetsch; T R Connor; A Mutreja; S M van Dorp; I M Sanders; H P Browne; D Harris; L Lipman; E C Keessen; J Corver; E J Kuijper; T D Lawley
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2014-11-13

9.  Genetic relatedness between Japanese and European isolates of Clostridium difficile originating from piglets and their risk associated with human health.

Authors:  Masaru Usui; Yukie Nanbu; Kentaro Oka; Motomichi Takahashi; Takashi Inamatsu; Tetsuo Asai; Shigeru Kamiya; Yutaka Tamura
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  International Clostridium difficile animal strain collection and large diversity of animal associated strains.

Authors:  Sandra Janezic; Valerija Zidaric; Bart Pardon; Alexander Indra; Branko Kokotovic; Jose Luis Blanco; Christian Seyboldt; Cristina Rodriguez Diaz; Ian R Poxton; Vincent Perreten; Ilenia Drigo; Alena Jiraskova; Matjaz Ocepek; J Scott Weese; J Glenn Songer; Mark H Wilcox; Maja Rupnik
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 3.605

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.