Literature DB >> 21919997

Clostridium difficile in Dutch animals: their presence, characteristics and similarities with human isolates.

M G J Koene1, D Mevius, J A Wagenaar, C Harmanus, M P M Hensgens, A M Meetsma, F F Putirulan, M A P van Bergen, E J Kuijper.   

Abstract

The presence and characteristics of Clostridium difficile were investigated in 839 faecal samples from seven different animal species in the Netherlands. The number of positive samples ranged from 3.4% (cattle) to 25.0% (dogs). Twenty-two different PCR ribotypes were identified. Among 96 isolates, 53% harboured toxin genes. All C. difficile isolates from pigs, cattle and poultry were toxinogenic, whereas the majority of isolates from pet animals consisted of non-toxinogenic PCR ribotypes 010 and 039. Ribotype 012 was most prevalent in cattle and ribotype 078 in pigs. No predominant ribotypes were present in horse and poultry samples. Overall, PCR ribotypes 012, 014 and 078 were the most frequently recovered toxinogenic ribotypes from animal samples. Comparison with human isolates from the Dutch Reference Laboratory for C. difficile at Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC) showed that these types were also recovered from human hospitalized patients in 2009/2010, encompassing 0.8%, 11.4% and 9.8% of all isolates, respectively. Application of multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis indicated a genotypic relation of animal and human ribotype 078 strains, but a clear genotypic distinction for ribotypes 012 and 014. We conclude that toxinogenic C. difficile PCR ribotypes found in animals correspond to PCR ribotypes associated with human disease in hospitalized patients in the Netherlands. Contrary to PCR ribotype 078, significant genetic differences were observed between animal and human PCR ribotype 012 and 014 isolates.
© 2011 The Authors. Clinical Microbiology and Infection © 2011 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21919997     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03651.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect        ISSN: 1198-743X            Impact factor:   8.067


  38 in total

1.  Clostridium difficile genotypes in piglet populations in Germany.

Authors:  Alexander Schneeberg; Heinrich Neubauer; Gernot Schmoock; Sylvia Baier; Jürgen Harlizius; Hendrik Nienhoff; Katja Brase; Stefan Zimmermann; Christian Seyboldt
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Clostridium difficile in Food and Animals: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  C Rodriguez; B Taminiau; J Van Broeck; M Delmée; G Daube
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  Toxin-producing Clostridium difficile strains as long-term gut colonizers in healthy infants.

Authors:  Ingegerd Adlerberth; Haihui Huang; Erika Lindberg; Nils Åberg; Bill Hesselmar; Robert Saalman; Carl Erik Nord; Agnes E Wold; Andrej Weintraub
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Laboratory detection of Clostridium difficile in piglets in Australia.

Authors:  Daniel R Knight; Michele M Squire; Thomas V Riley
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Clostridioides difficile Spores: Bile Acid Sensors and Trojan Horses of Transmission.

Authors:  Aimee Shen
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2020-02-25

6.  Prevalence of gastrointestinal Clostridium difficile carriage in Australian sheep and lambs.

Authors:  Daniel R Knight; Thomas V Riley
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Clostridioides difficile ribotypes isolated from domestic environment and from patients in Bangladesh.

Authors:  Mohammad Aminul Islam; Nayel D Kabir; M Moniruzzaman; Khurshida Begum; Dilruba Ahmed; A S G Faruque; Kevin W Garey; M Jahangir Alam
Journal:  Anaerobe       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 3.331

Review 8.  A possible route for foodborne transmission of Clostridium difficile?

Authors:  Barbara M Lund; Michael W Peck
Journal:  Foodborne Pathog Dis       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 3.171

9.  Different antibiotic resistance and sporulation properties within multiclonal Clostridium difficile PCR ribotypes 078, 126, and 033 in a single calf farm.

Authors:  Valerija Zidaric; Bart Pardon; Tiago Dos Vultos; Piet Deprez; Michael Sebastiaan Maria Brouwer; Adam P Roberts; Adriano O Henriques; Maja Rupnik
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Cross-sectional study reveals high prevalence of Clostridium difficile non-PCR ribotype 078 strains in Australian veal calves at slaughter.

Authors:  Daniel R Knight; Sara Thean; Papanin Putsathit; Stan Fenwick; Thomas V Riley
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.