BACKGROUND: Pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs) are rare tumors of the adrenal medulla and extra-adrenal sympathetic chromaffin tissues; their anatomical and functional imaging are critical to guiding treatment decisions. This study aimed to compare the sensitivity and specificity of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT) for tumor localization and staging of PPGLs with that of conventional imaging by [(123)I]-metaiodobenzylguanidine single photon emission CT ((123)I-MIBG SPECT), CT, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: A total of 216 patients (106 men, 110 women, aged 45.2 ± 14.9 years) with suspected PPGL underwent CT or MRI, (18)F-FDG PET/CT, and (123)I-MIBG SPECT/CT. Sensitivity and specificity were measured as endpoints and compared by the McNemar test, using two-sided P values only. RESULTS: Sixty (28%) of patients had nonmetastatic PPGL, 95 (44%) had metastatic PPGL, and 61 (28%) were PPGL negative. For nonmetastatic tumors, the sensitivity of (18)F-FDG was similar to that of (123)I-MIBG but less than that of CT/MRI (sensitivity of (18)F-FDG = 76.8%; of (123)I-MIBG = 75.0%; of CT/MRI = 95.7%; (18)F-FDG vs (123)I-MIBG: difference = 1.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -14.8% to 14.8%, P = .210; (18)F-FDG vs CT/MRI: difference = 18.9%, 95% CI = 9.4% to 28.3%, P < .001). The specificity was 90.2% for (18)F-FDG, 91.8% for (123)I-MIBG, and 90.2% for CT/MRI. (18)F-FDG uptake was higher in succinate dehydrogenase complex- and von Hippel-Lindau syndrome-related tumors than in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 (MEN2) related tumors. For metastases, sensitivity was greater for (18)F-FDG and CT/MRI than for (123)I-MIBG (sensitivity of (18)F-FDG = 82.5%; of (123)I-MIBG = 50.0%; of CT/MRI = 74.4%; (18)F-FDG vs (123)I-MIBG: difference = 32.5%, 95% CI = 22.3% to 42.5%, P < .001; CT/MRI vs (123)I-MIBG: difference = 24.4%, 95% CI = 11.3% to 31.6%, P < .001). For bone metastases, (18)F-FDG was more sensitive than CT/MRI (sensitivity of (18)F-FDG = 93.7%; of CT/MRI = 76.7%; difference = 17.0%, 95% CI = 4.9% to 28.5%, P = .013). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with (123)I-MIBG SPECT and CT/MRI, both considered gold standards for PPGL imaging, metastases were better detected by (18)F-FDG PET. (18)F-FDG PET provides a high specificity in patients with a biochemically established diagnosis of PPGL.
BACKGROUND:Pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs) are rare tumors of the adrenal medulla and extra-adrenal sympathetic chromaffin tissues; their anatomical and functional imaging are critical to guiding treatment decisions. This study aimed to compare the sensitivity and specificity of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT) for tumor localization and staging of PPGLs with that of conventional imaging by [(123)I]-metaiodobenzylguanidine single photon emission CT ((123)I-MIBG SPECT), CT, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: A total of 216 patients (106 men, 110 women, aged 45.2 ± 14.9 years) with suspected PPGL underwent CT or MRI, (18)F-FDG PET/CT, and (123)I-MIBG SPECT/CT. Sensitivity and specificity were measured as endpoints and compared by the McNemar test, using two-sided P values only. RESULTS: Sixty (28%) of patients had nonmetastatic PPGL, 95 (44%) had metastatic PPGL, and 61 (28%) were PPGL negative. For nonmetastatic tumors, the sensitivity of (18)F-FDG was similar to that of (123)I-MIBG but less than that of CT/MRI (sensitivity of (18)F-FDG = 76.8%; of (123)I-MIBG = 75.0%; of CT/MRI = 95.7%; (18)F-FDG vs (123)I-MIBG: difference = 1.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -14.8% to 14.8%, P = .210; (18)F-FDG vs CT/MRI: difference = 18.9%, 95% CI = 9.4% to 28.3%, P < .001). The specificity was 90.2% for (18)F-FDG, 91.8% for (123)I-MIBG, and 90.2% for CT/MRI. (18)F-FDG uptake was higher in succinate dehydrogenase complex- and von Hippel-Lindau syndrome-related tumors than in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 (MEN2) related tumors. For metastases, sensitivity was greater for (18)F-FDG and CT/MRI than for (123)I-MIBG (sensitivity of (18)F-FDG = 82.5%; of (123)I-MIBG = 50.0%; of CT/MRI = 74.4%; (18)F-FDG vs (123)I-MIBG: difference = 32.5%, 95% CI = 22.3% to 42.5%, P < .001; CT/MRI vs (123)I-MIBG: difference = 24.4%, 95% CI = 11.3% to 31.6%, P < .001). For bone metastases, (18)F-FDG was more sensitive than CT/MRI (sensitivity of (18)F-FDG = 93.7%; of CT/MRI = 76.7%; difference = 17.0%, 95% CI = 4.9% to 28.5%, P = .013). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with (123)I-MIBG SPECT and CT/MRI, both considered gold standards for PPGL imaging, metastases were better detected by (18)F-FDG PET. (18)F-FDG PET provides a high specificity in patients with a biochemically established diagnosis of PPGL.
Authors: Kathryn S King; Clara C Chen; Dimitrios K Alexopoulos; Millie A Whatley; James C Reynolds; Nicholas Patronas; Alexander Ling; Karen T Adams; Paraskevi Xekouki; Howard Lando; Constantine A Stratakis; Karel Pacak Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2011-07-13 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Henri J L M Timmers; Anna Kozupa; Graeme Eisenhofer; Margarita Raygada; Karen T Adams; Daniel Solis; Jacques W M Lenders; Karel Pacak Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2007-01-02 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Jacques W M Lenders; Karel Pacak; McClellan M Walther; W Marston Linehan; Massimo Mannelli; Peter Friberg; Harry R Keiser; David S Goldstein; Graeme Eisenhofer Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-03-20 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Priya Kaji; Jorge A Carrasquillo; W Marston Linehan; Clara C Chen; Graeme Eisenhofer; Peter A Pinto; Edwin W Lai; Karel Pacak Journal: Eur J Endocrinol Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 6.664
Authors: Henri J L M Timmers; Mohiuddin Hadi; Jorge A Carrasquillo; Clara C Chen; Lucia Martiniova; Millie Whatley; Alexander Ling; Graeme Eisenhofer; Karen T Adams; Karel Pacak Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2007-09-14 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Hartmut P H Neumann; Christian Pawlu; Mariola Peczkowska; Birke Bausch; Sarah R McWhinney; Mihaela Muresan; Mary Buchta; Gerlind Franke; Joachim Klisch; Thorsten A Bley; Stefan Hoegerle; Carsten C Boedeker; Giuseppe Opocher; Jörg Schipper; Andrzej Januszewicz; Charis Eng Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-08-25 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Yuejuan Qin; Li Yao; Elizabeth E King; Kalyan Buddavarapu; Romina E Lenci; E Sandra Chocron; James D Lechleiter; Meghan Sass; Neil Aronin; Francesca Schiavi; Francesca Boaretto; Giuseppe Opocher; Rodrigo A Toledo; Sergio P A Toledo; Charles Stiles; Ricardo C T Aguiar; Patricia L M Dahia Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2010-02-14 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Jean-Pierre Bayley; Henricus P M Kunst; Alberto Cascon; Maria Lourdes Sampietro; José Gaal; Esther Korpershoek; Adolfo Hinojar-Gutierrez; Henri J L M Timmers; Lies H Hoefsloot; Mario A Hermsen; Carlos Suárez; A Karim Hussain; Annette H J T Vriends; Frederik J Hes; Jeroen C Jansen; Carli M Tops; Eleonora P Corssmit; Peter de Knijff; Jacques W M Lenders; Cor W R J Cremers; Peter Devilee; Winand N M Dinjens; Ronald R de Krijger; Mercedes Robledo Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2010-01-11 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Patricia L M Dahia; Ken N Ross; Matthew E Wright; César Y Hayashida; Sandro Santagata; Marta Barontini; Andrew L Kung; Gabriela Sanso; James F Powers; Arthur S Tischler; Richard Hodin; Shannon Heitritter; Francis Moore; Robert Dluhy; Julie Ann Sosa; I Tolgay Ocal; Diana E Benn; Deborah J Marsh; Bruce G Robinson; Katherine Schneider; Judy Garber; Seth M Arum; Márta Korbonits; Ashley Grossman; Pascal Pigny; Sérgio P A Toledo; Vania Nosé; Cheng Li; Charles D Stiles Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2005-07-25 Impact factor: 5.917
Authors: Ingo Janssen; Elise M Blanchet; Karen Adams; Clara C Chen; Corina M Millo; Peter Herscovitch; David Taieb; Electron Kebebew; Hendrik Lehnert; Antonio T Fojo; Karel Pacak Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2015-04-14 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Juan P Brito; Noor Asi; Michael R Gionfriddo; Catalina Norman; Aaron L Leppin; Claudia Zeballos-Palacios; Chaitanya Undavalli; Zhen Wang; Juan P Domecq; Gabriela Prustsky; Tarig A Elraiyah; Larry J Prokop; Victor M Montori; Mohammad Hassan Murad Journal: Endocrine Date: 2015-02-06 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: Eran Goldin; Mahmud Mahamid; Benjamin Koslowsky; Shimon Shteingart; Yael Dubner; Gadi Lalazar; Dov Wengrower Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2014-04-21 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Zahraa Abdul Sater; Abhishek Jha; Adel Mandl; Sheila K Mangelen; Jorge A Carrasquillo; Alexander Ling; Melissa K Gonzales; Osorio Lopes Abath Neto; Markku Miettinen; Karen T Adams; Pavel Nockel; Mustapha El Lakis; Karel Pacak Journal: Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2019-02-19