Literature DB >> 25663601

The incremental benefit of functional imaging in pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma: a systematic review.

Juan P Brito1, Noor Asi, Michael R Gionfriddo, Catalina Norman, Aaron L Leppin, Claudia Zeballos-Palacios, Chaitanya Undavalli, Zhen Wang, Juan P Domecq, Gabriela Prustsky, Tarig A Elraiyah, Larry J Prokop, Victor M Montori, Mohammad Hassan Murad.   

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the major imaging modalities used for the localization of catecholamine-producing tumors (pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma). Functional imaging (FI) offers an alternative approach to localize, evaluate, and stage these tumors. Our objective was to describe the additive benefit of FI studies for patients with pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPG) who have undergone MRI or CT scan evaluation. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus from database inception through June 2012 for studies that included patients with biochemically proven PPGs who underwent CT or MRI and additional FI for the localization of PPGs. We included 32 studies enrolling a total of 1,264 patients with a mean age of 43-years old. The studies were uncontrolled and evaluated six FI modalities. FI tests provided small additive value to CT/MRI, aiding in the localization of only 24/1,445 primary cases (1.4 %) and 28/805 metastatic cases (3.5 %). In metastatic cases, 6-[F-18]fluoro-L-dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA) and fluorodopamine-PET (FDA) were the FI tests most successful at identifying disease missed by CT/MRI, providing additional benefit in 6/60 (10 %) and 5/78 (6.4 %) cases, respectively. No clinically significant findings were observed in any of the predefined subgroups. No study evaluated the impact of FI on the completeness of surgical resection or other patient-important outcomes. Observational evidence suggests that FI tests have a limited additional role in patients with PPGs who have undergone CT/MRI evaluation. However, the role of FI tests in specific subgroups of patients with atypical presentations (metastatic, extra-adrenal) as well as the use of hybrid FI tests should be explored. Further research should also evaluate the impact of FI tests on patient-important outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25663601     DOI: 10.1007/s12020-015-0544-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endocrine        ISSN: 1355-008X            Impact factor:   3.633


  52 in total

1.  Functional imaging of SDHx-related head and neck paragangliomas: comparison of 18F-fluorodihydroxyphenylalanine, 18F-fluorodopamine, 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose PET, 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy, and 111In-pentetreotide scintigraphy.

Authors:  Kathryn S King; Clara C Chen; Dimitrios K Alexopoulos; Millie A Whatley; James C Reynolds; Nicholas Patronas; Alexander Ling; Karen T Adams; Paraskevi Xekouki; Howard Lando; Constantine A Stratakis; Karel Pacak
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 5.958

2.  MR imaging and MIBG scintigraphy of pheochromocytomas and extraadrenal functioning paragangliomas.

Authors:  A P van Gils; T H Falke; A R van Erkel; J W Arndt; M P Sandler; A G van der Mey; R P Hoogma
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 3.  Evolving concepts in the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of pheochromocytoma.

Authors:  E L Bravo
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 19.871

4.  The role of 6-[18F]fluorodopamine positron emission tomography in the localization of adrenal pheochromocytoma associated with von Hippel-Lindau syndrome.

Authors:  Priya Kaji; Jorge A Carrasquillo; W Marston Linehan; Clara C Chen; Graeme Eisenhofer; Peter A Pinto; Edwin W Lai; Karel Pacak
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 6.664

Review 5.  Recent advances in genetics, diagnosis, localization, and treatment of pheochromocytoma.

Authors:  K Pacak; W M Linehan; G Eisenhofer; M M Walther; D S Goldstein
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2001-02-20       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 6.  Adrenal causes of hypertension: pheochromocytoma and primary aldosteronism.

Authors:  William F Young
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 6.514

7.  Complementary roles of CT and 131I-MIBG scintigraphy in diagnosing pheochromocytoma.

Authors:  I R Francis; G M Glazer; B Shapiro; J C Sisson; B H Gross
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 8.  New imaging approaches to phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas.

Authors:  Bas Havekes; Kathryn King; Edwin W Lai; Johannes A Romijn; Eleonora P M Corssmit; Karel Pacak
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 3.478

9.  111In-octreotide is superior to 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine for scintigraphic detection of head and neck paragangliomas.

Authors:  Klaas Pieter Koopmans; Pieter L Jager; Ido P Kema; Michiel N Kerstens; Frans Albers; Robin P F Dullaart
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Predictive characteristics of malignant pheochromocytoma.

Authors:  Junsoo Park; Cheryn Song; Myungchan Park; Sangjun Yoo; Se Jun Park; Seokjun Hong; Bumsik Hong; Choung-Soo Kim; Hanjong Ahn
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2011-04-22
View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Treatment for Malignant Pheochromocytomas and Paragangliomas: 5 Years of Progress.

Authors:  Paola Jimenez; Claudio Tatsui; Aaron Jessop; Sonali Thosani; Camilo Jimenez
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Trimodal (18)F-DOPA PET/CT/MR fusion imaging for optimal restaging of head and neck paragangliomas in a SDHD mutation carrier.

Authors:  Giorgio Treglia; Teresa Ruberto; Luca Giovanella
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 3.633

3.  Functional imaging for pheochromocytoma-paraganglioma: a step closer to understanding its place in clinical practice.

Authors:  Camilo Jimenez; Steven G Waguespack
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 4.  Pheochromocytomas and Hypertension.

Authors:  Joseph M Pappachan; Nyo Nyo Tun; Ganesan Arunagirinathan; Ravinder Sodi; Fahmy W F Hanna
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 5.369

5.  Pheochromocytoma in Urologic Practice.

Authors:  Nikhil Waingankar; Gennady Bratslavsky; Camilo Jimenez; Paul Russo; Alexander Kutikov
Journal:  Eur Urol Focus       Date:  2016-09-28

Review 6.  Consensus on molecular imaging and theranostics in neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Authors:  Valentina Ambrosini; Jolanta Kunikowska; Eric Baudin; Lisa Bodei; Catherine Bouvier; Jaume Capdevila; Marta Cremonesi; Wouter W de Herder; Clarisse Dromain; Massimo Falconi; Melpomeni Fani; Stefano Fanti; Rodney J Hicks; Levent Kabasakal; Gregory Kaltsas; Val Lewington; Silvia Minozzi; Michela Cinquini; Kjell Öberg; Wim J G Oyen; Dermot O'Toole; Marianne Pavel; Philippe Ruszniewski; Aldo Scarpa; Jonathan Strosberg; Anders Sundin; David Taïeb; Irene Virgolini; Damian Wild; Ken Herrmann; James Yao
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 9.162

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.