OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to determine whether residual risk after high-dose statin therapy for primary prevention individuals with reduced levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is related to on-treatment apolipoprotein B, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), trigylcerides, or lipid ratios, and how they compare with on-treatment LDL-C. BACKGROUND: Guidelines focus on LDL-C as the primary target of therapy, yet residual risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) among statin-treated individuals remains high and not fully explained. METHODS: Participants in the randomized placebo-controlled JUPITER (Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: An Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin) trial were adults without diabetes or CVD, with baseline LDL-C levels <130 mg/dl, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels ≥2 mg/l, and triglyceride concentrations <500 mg/dl. Individuals allocated to receive rosuvastatin 20 mg daily with baseline and on-treatment lipids and lipoproteins were examined in relation to the primary endpoint of incident CVD (nonfatal myocardial infarction or stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina, arterial revascularization, or cardiovascular death). RESULTS: Using separate multivariate Cox models, statistically significant associations of a similar magnitude with residual risk of CVD were found for on-treatment LDL-C, non-HDL-C, apolipoprotein B, total cholesterol/HDL-C, LDL-C/HDL-C, and apolipoprotein B/A-I. The respective adjusted standardized hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for each of these measures were 1.31 (1.09 to 1.56), 1.25 (1.04 to 1.50), 1.27 (1.06 to 1.53), 1.22 (1.03 to 1.44), 1.29 (1.09 to 1.52), and 1.27 (1.09 to 1.49). The overall residual risk and the risk associated with these measures decreased among participants achieving on-treatment LDL-C ≤70 mg/dl, on-treatment non-HDL-C ≤100 mg/dl, or on-treatment apolipoprotein B ≤80 mg/dl. In contrast, on-treatment triglycerides showed no association with CVD. CONCLUSIONS: In this primary prevention trial of nondiabetic individuals with low LDL-C and elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, on-treatment LDL-C was as valuable as non-HDL-C, apolipoprotein B, or ratios in predicting residual risk. (JUPITER-Crestor 20mg Versus Placebo in Prevention of Cardiovascular [CV] Events; NCT00239681).
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to determine whether residual risk after high-dose statin therapy for primary prevention individuals with reduced levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is related to on-treatment apolipoprotein B, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), trigylcerides, or lipid ratios, and how they compare with on-treatment LDL-C. BACKGROUND: Guidelines focus on LDL-C as the primary target of therapy, yet residual risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) among statin-treated individuals remains high and not fully explained. METHODS:Participants in the randomized placebo-controlled JUPITER (Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: An Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin) trial were adults without diabetes or CVD, with baseline LDL-C levels <130 mg/dl, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels ≥2 mg/l, and triglyceride concentrations <500 mg/dl. Individuals allocated to receive rosuvastatin 20 mg daily with baseline and on-treatment lipids and lipoproteins were examined in relation to the primary endpoint of incident CVD (nonfatal myocardial infarction or stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina, arterial revascularization, or cardiovascular death). RESULTS: Using separate multivariate Cox models, statistically significant associations of a similar magnitude with residual risk of CVD were found for on-treatment LDL-C, non-HDL-C, apolipoprotein B, total cholesterol/HDL-C, LDL-C/HDL-C, and apolipoprotein B/A-I. The respective adjusted standardized hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for each of these measures were 1.31 (1.09 to 1.56), 1.25 (1.04 to 1.50), 1.27 (1.06 to 1.53), 1.22 (1.03 to 1.44), 1.29 (1.09 to 1.52), and 1.27 (1.09 to 1.49). The overall residual risk and the risk associated with these measures decreased among participants achieving on-treatment LDL-C ≤70 mg/dl, on-treatment non-HDL-C ≤100 mg/dl, or on-treatment apolipoprotein B ≤80 mg/dl. In contrast, on-treatment triglycerides showed no association with CVD. CONCLUSIONS: In this primary prevention trial of nondiabetic individuals with low LDL-C and elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, on-treatment LDL-C was as valuable as non-HDL-C, apolipoprotein B, or ratios in predicting residual risk. (JUPITER-Crestor 20mg Versus Placebo in Prevention of Cardiovascular [CV] Events; NCT00239681).
Authors: R John Simes; Ian C Marschner; David Hunt; David Colquhoun; David Sullivan; Ralph A H Stewart; Wendy Hague; Anthony Keech; Peter Thompson; Harvey White; John Shaw; Andrew Tonkin Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-03-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: T R Pedersen; A G Olsson; O Faergeman; J Kjekshus; H Wedel; K Berg; L Wilhelmsen; T Haghfelt; G Thorgeirsson; K Pyörälä; T Miettinen; B Christophersen; J A Tobert; T A Musliner; T J Cook Journal: Circulation Date: 1998-04-21 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: F M Sacks; L A Moyé; B R Davis; T G Cole; J L Rouleau; D T Nash; M A Pfeffer; E Braunwald Journal: Circulation Date: 1998-04-21 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: C Baigent; A Keech; P M Kearney; L Blackwell; G Buck; C Pollicino; A Kirby; T Sourjina; R Peto; R Collins; R Simes Journal: Lancet Date: 2005-09-27 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: A M Gotto; E Whitney; E A Stein; D R Shapiro; M Clearfield; S Weis; J Y Jou; A Langendörfer; P A Beere; D J Watson; J R Downs; J S de Cani Journal: Circulation Date: 2000-02-08 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: P J Barter; C M Ballantyne; R Carmena; M Castro Cabezas; M John Chapman; P Couture; J de Graaf; P N Durrington; O Faergeman; J Frohlich; C D Furberg; C Gagne; S M Haffner; S E Humphries; I Jungner; R M Krauss; P Kwiterovich; S Marcovina; C J Packard; T A Pearson; K Srinath Reddy; R Rosenson; N Sarrafzadegan; A D Sniderman; A F Stalenhoef; E Stein; P J Talmud; A M Tonkin; G Walldius; K M S Williams Journal: J Intern Med Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 8.989
Authors: C Baigent; L Blackwell; J Emberson; L E Holland; C Reith; N Bhala; R Peto; E H Barnes; A Keech; J Simes; R Collins Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-11-08 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Audrey Y Chu; Franco Giulianini; Bryan J Barratt; Bo Ding; Fredrik Nyberg; Samia Mora; Paul M Ridker; Daniel I Chasman Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Genet Date: 2015-08-13
Authors: Anthony N DeMaria; Jeroen J Bax; Gregory K Feld; Barry H Greenberg; Jennifer L Hall; Mark A Hlatky; Wilbur Y W Lew; João A C Lima; Ehtisham Mahmud; Alan S Maisel; Sanjiv M Narayan; Steven E Nissen; David J Sahn; Sotirios Tsimikas Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-01-22 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Akintunde O Akinkuolie; Patrick R Lawler; Audrey Y Chu; Michael Caulfield; Jianying Mu; Bo Ding; Fredrik Nyberg; Robert J Glynn; Paul M Ridker; Eva Hurt-Camejo; Daniel I Chasman; Samia Mora Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Sagar B Dugani; Akintunde O Akinkuolie; Nina Paynter; Robert J Glynn; Paul M Ridker; Samia Mora Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2016-05-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Samia Mora; Michael P Caulfield; Jay Wohlgemuth; Zhihong Chen; H Robert Superko; Charles M Rowland; Robert J Glynn; Paul M Ridker; Ronald M Krauss Journal: Circulation Date: 2015-09-25 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Christian Werner; Anja Filmer; Marco Fritsch; Stephanie Groenewold; Stefan Gräber; Michael Böhm; Ulrich Laufs Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2014-07-11 Impact factor: 5.460