Literature DB >> 22516441

On-treatment non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, triglycerides, and lipid ratios in relation to residual vascular risk after treatment with potent statin therapy: JUPITER (justification for the use of statins in prevention: an intervention trial evaluating rosuvastatin).

Samia Mora1, Robert J Glynn, S Matthijs Boekholdt, Børge G Nordestgaard, John J P Kastelein, Paul M Ridker.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to determine whether residual risk after high-dose statin therapy for primary prevention individuals with reduced levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is related to on-treatment apolipoprotein B, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), trigylcerides, or lipid ratios, and how they compare with on-treatment LDL-C.
BACKGROUND: Guidelines focus on LDL-C as the primary target of therapy, yet residual risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) among statin-treated individuals remains high and not fully explained.
METHODS: Participants in the randomized placebo-controlled JUPITER (Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: An Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin) trial were adults without diabetes or CVD, with baseline LDL-C levels <130 mg/dl, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels ≥2 mg/l, and triglyceride concentrations <500 mg/dl. Individuals allocated to receive rosuvastatin 20 mg daily with baseline and on-treatment lipids and lipoproteins were examined in relation to the primary endpoint of incident CVD (nonfatal myocardial infarction or stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina, arterial revascularization, or cardiovascular death).
RESULTS: Using separate multivariate Cox models, statistically significant associations of a similar magnitude with residual risk of CVD were found for on-treatment LDL-C, non-HDL-C, apolipoprotein B, total cholesterol/HDL-C, LDL-C/HDL-C, and apolipoprotein B/A-I. The respective adjusted standardized hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for each of these measures were 1.31 (1.09 to 1.56), 1.25 (1.04 to 1.50), 1.27 (1.06 to 1.53), 1.22 (1.03 to 1.44), 1.29 (1.09 to 1.52), and 1.27 (1.09 to 1.49). The overall residual risk and the risk associated with these measures decreased among participants achieving on-treatment LDL-C ≤70 mg/dl, on-treatment non-HDL-C ≤100 mg/dl, or on-treatment apolipoprotein B ≤80 mg/dl. In contrast, on-treatment triglycerides showed no association with CVD.
CONCLUSIONS: In this primary prevention trial of nondiabetic individuals with low LDL-C and elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, on-treatment LDL-C was as valuable as non-HDL-C, apolipoprotein B, or ratios in predicting residual risk. (JUPITER-Crestor 20mg Versus Placebo in Prevention of Cardiovascular [CV] Events; NCT00239681).
Copyright © 2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22516441      PMCID: PMC3338194          DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  26 in total

1.  Relationship between lipid levels and clinical outcomes in the Long-term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease (LIPID) Trial: to what extent is the reduction in coronary events with pravastatin explained by on-study lipid levels?

Authors:  R John Simes; Ian C Marschner; David Hunt; David Colquhoun; David Sullivan; Ralph A H Stewart; Wendy Hague; Anthony Keech; Peter Thompson; Harvey White; John Shaw; Andrew Tonkin
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-03-12       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Lipoprotein changes and reduction in the incidence of major coronary heart disease events in the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S)

Authors:  T R Pedersen; A G Olsson; O Faergeman; J Kjekshus; H Wedel; K Berg; L Wilhelmsen; T Haghfelt; G Thorgeirsson; K Pyörälä; T Miettinen; B Christophersen; J A Tobert; T A Musliner; T J Cook
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-04-21       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Influence of pravastatin and plasma lipids on clinical events in the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study (WOSCOPS).

Authors: 
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-04-21       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Relationship between plasma LDL concentrations during treatment with pravastatin and recurrent coronary events in the Cholesterol and Recurrent Events trial.

Authors:  F M Sacks; L A Moyé; B R Davis; T G Cole; J L Rouleau; D T Nash; M A Pfeffer; E Braunwald
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-04-21       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge.

Authors:  W T Friedewald; R I Levy; D S Fredrickson
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 8.327

6.  Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins.

Authors:  C Baigent; A Keech; P M Kearney; L Blackwell; G Buck; C Pollicino; A Kirby; T Sourjina; R Peto; R Collins; R Simes
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005-09-27       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Relation between baseline and on-treatment lipid parameters and first acute major coronary events in the Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study (AFCAPS/TexCAPS).

Authors:  A M Gotto; E Whitney; E A Stein; D R Shapiro; M Clearfield; S Weis; J Y Jou; A Langendörfer; P A Beere; D J Watson; J R Downs; J S de Cani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-02-08       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 8.  Justification for the Use of Statins in Primary Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER)--can C-reactive protein be used to target statin therapy in primary prevention?

Authors:  Samia Mora; Paul M Ridker
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Apo B versus cholesterol in estimating cardiovascular risk and in guiding therapy: report of the thirty-person/ten-country panel.

Authors:  P J Barter; C M Ballantyne; R Carmena; M Castro Cabezas; M John Chapman; P Couture; J de Graaf; P N Durrington; O Faergeman; J Frohlich; C D Furberg; C Gagne; S M Haffner; S E Humphries; I Jungner; R M Krauss; P Kwiterovich; S Marcovina; C J Packard; T A Pearson; K Srinath Reddy; R Rosenson; N Sarrafzadegan; A D Sniderman; A F Stalenhoef; E Stein; P J Talmud; A M Tonkin; G Walldius; K M S Williams
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 8.989

10.  Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials.

Authors:  C Baigent; L Blackwell; J Emberson; L E Holland; C Reith; N Bhala; R Peto; E H Barnes; A Keech; J Simes; R Collins
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  32 in total

1.  Differential Genetic Effects on Statin-Induced Changes Across Low-Density Lipoprotein-Related Measures.

Authors:  Audrey Y Chu; Franco Giulianini; Bryan J Barratt; Bo Ding; Fredrik Nyberg; Samia Mora; Paul M Ridker; Daniel I Chasman
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Genet       Date:  2015-08-13

Review 2.  Highlights of the year in JACC 2012.

Authors:  Anthony N DeMaria; Jeroen J Bax; Gregory K Feld; Barry H Greenberg; Jennifer L Hall; Mark A Hlatky; Wilbur Y W Lew; João A C Lima; Ehtisham Mahmud; Alan S Maisel; Sanjiv M Narayan; Steven E Nissen; David J Sahn; Sotirios Tsimikas
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 3.  HDL cholesterol and cardiovascular outcomes: what is the evidence?

Authors:  Melvyn Rubenfire; Robert D Brook
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  High-density lipoprotein cholesterol, size, particle number, and residual vascular risk after potent statin therapy.

Authors:  Samia Mora; Robert J Glynn; Paul M Ridker
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Group IIA Secretory Phospholipase A2, Vascular Inflammation, and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Akintunde O Akinkuolie; Patrick R Lawler; Audrey Y Chu; Michael Caulfield; Jianying Mu; Bo Ding; Fredrik Nyberg; Robert J Glynn; Paul M Ridker; Eva Hurt-Camejo; Daniel I Chasman; Samia Mora
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 8.311

Review 6.  Which Lipids Should Be Analyzed for Diagnostic Workup and Follow-up of Patients with Hyperlipidemias?

Authors:  Michel R Langlois; Børge G Nordestgaard
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Association of Lipoproteins, Insulin Resistance, and Rosuvastatin With Incident Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus : Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Sagar B Dugani; Akintunde O Akinkuolie; Nina Paynter; Robert J Glynn; Paul M Ridker; Samia Mora
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 14.676

8.  Statin Dose and the Risk of Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Population-Based Longitudinal Study in Taiwan.

Authors:  Shih-Jie Jhuo; Wei-Chung Tsai; Tsung-Hsien Lin; Wen-Chol Voon; Wen-Ter Lai; Sheng-Hsiung Sheu
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.672

9.  Atherogenic Lipoprotein Subfractions Determined by Ion Mobility and First Cardiovascular Events After Random Allocation to High-Intensity Statin or Placebo: The Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: An Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER) Trial.

Authors:  Samia Mora; Michael P Caulfield; Jay Wohlgemuth; Zhihong Chen; H Robert Superko; Charles M Rowland; Robert J Glynn; Paul M Ridker; Ronald M Krauss
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Risk prediction with triglycerides in patients with stable coronary disease on statin treatment.

Authors:  Christian Werner; Anja Filmer; Marco Fritsch; Stephanie Groenewold; Stefan Gräber; Michael Böhm; Ulrich Laufs
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 5.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.