Samia Mora1, Robert J Glynn, Paul M Ridker. 1. Center for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention, Division of Preventive Medicine (S.M., R.J.G., P.MR.) and Division of Cardiovascular Medicine (S.M., P.MR.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; and Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA (R.J.G.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chemically measured high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) may not be the best clinical measure of HDL. Little is known about alternative HDL measures such as HDL size or particle number (HDL-P) as determinants of residual risk after potent statin therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: In Justification for the Use of statins in Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER), HDL size and HDL-P were measured by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and HDL-C and apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I) were chemically assayed in 10 886 participants without cardiovascular disease (CVD) before and after random allocation torosuvastatin 20 mg/d or placebo. Levels were examined with first CVD (n=234). HDL-P correlated better with apoA-I (Spearman r=0.69, P<0.0001) than with HDL-C (r=0.55, P<0.0001). Rosuvastatin lowered low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (49%) and raised HDL-C (6.1%), apoA-I (2.1%), HDL-P (3.8%), and HDL size (1.2%); all P<0.0001. Among placebo-allocated individuals, on-treatment HDL-C, apoA-I, and HDL-P had similar inverse associations with CVD (risk factor-adjusted hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval per 1 standard deviation: 0.79 [0.63-0.98], 0.75 [0.62-0.92], and 0.81 [0.67-0.97], respectively). Among rosuvastatin-allocated individuals, on-treatment HDL-P had a statistically significant and somewhat stronger association with CVD (0.73, 0.57-0.93, P=0.01) than HDL-C (0.82, 0.63-1.08, P=0.16) or apoA-I (0.86, 0.67-1.10, P=0.22). Among rosuvastatin-allocated individuals, on-treatment HDL-P remained significant (0.72, 0.53-0.97, P=0.03) after additionally adjusting for HDL-C. In risk factor-adjusted models, HDL size showed no significant association with CVD. CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of potent statin therapy, HDL particle number may be a better marker of residual risk than chemically measured HDL-C or apoA-I. This has potential implications for evaluating novel therapies targeting HDL. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00239681.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Chemically measured high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) may not be the best clinical measure of HDL. Little is known about alternative HDL measures such as HDL size or particle number (HDL-P) as determinants of residual risk after potent statin therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: In Justification for the Use of statins in Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER), HDL size and HDL-P were measured by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and HDL-C and apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I) were chemically assayed in 10 886 participants without cardiovascular disease (CVD) before and after random allocation to rosuvastatin 20 mg/d or placebo. Levels were examined with first CVD (n=234). HDL-P correlated better with apoA-I (Spearman r=0.69, P<0.0001) than with HDL-C (r=0.55, P<0.0001). Rosuvastatin lowered low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (49%) and raised HDL-C (6.1%), apoA-I (2.1%), HDL-P (3.8%), and HDL size (1.2%); all P<0.0001. Among placebo-allocated individuals, on-treatment HDL-C, apoA-I, and HDL-P had similar inverse associations with CVD (risk factor-adjusted hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval per 1 standard deviation: 0.79 [0.63-0.98], 0.75 [0.62-0.92], and 0.81 [0.67-0.97], respectively). Among rosuvastatin-allocated individuals, on-treatment HDL-P had a statistically significant and somewhat stronger association with CVD (0.73, 0.57-0.93, P=0.01) than HDL-C (0.82, 0.63-1.08, P=0.16) or apoA-I (0.86, 0.67-1.10, P=0.22). Among rosuvastatin-allocated individuals, on-treatment HDL-P remained significant (0.72, 0.53-0.97, P=0.03) after additionally adjusting for HDL-C. In risk factor-adjusted models, HDL size showed no significant association with CVD. CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of potent statin therapy, HDL particle number may be a better marker of residual risk than chemically measured HDL-C or apoA-I. This has potential implications for evaluating novel therapies targeting HDL. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00239681.
Authors: Ronald M Krauss; Kathleen Wojnooski; Joseph Orr; J Casey Geaney; Cathy Anne Pinto; Yang Liu; John A Wagner; Julie Mabalot Luk; Amy O Johnson-Levonas; Matt S Anderson; Hayes M Dansky Journal: J Lipid Res Date: 2011-12-17 Impact factor: 5.922
Authors: William E Boden; Jeffrey L Probstfield; Todd Anderson; Bernard R Chaitman; Patrice Desvignes-Nickens; Kent Koprowicz; Ruth McBride; Koon Teo; William Weintraub Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-11-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Samia Mora; James D Otvos; Nader Rifai; Robert S Rosenson; Julie E Buring; Paul M Ridker Journal: Circulation Date: 2009-02-09 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Steven E Nissen; Taro Tsunoda; E Murat Tuzcu; Paul Schoenhagen; Christopher J Cooper; Muhammad Yasin; Gregory M Eaton; Michael A Lauer; W Scott Sheldon; Cindy L Grines; Stephen Halpern; Tim Crowe; James C Blankenship; Richard Kerensky Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-11-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Gregory G Schwartz; Anders G Olsson; Markus Abt; Christie M Ballantyne; Philip J Barter; Jochen Brumm; Bernard R Chaitman; Ingar M Holme; David Kallend; Lawrence A Leiter; Eran Leitersdorf; John J V McMurray; Hardi Mundl; Stephen J Nicholls; Prediman K Shah; Jean-Claude Tardif; R Scott Wright Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-11-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jean-Charles Fruchart; Frank Sacks; Michel P Hermans; Gerd Assmann; W Virgil Brown; Richard Ceska; M John Chapman; Paul M Dodson; Paola Fioretto; Henry N Ginsberg; Takashi Kadowaki; Jean-Marc Lablanche; Nikolaus Marx; Jorge Plutzky; Zeljko Reiner; Robert S Rosenson; Bart Staels; Jane K Stock; Rody Sy; Christoph Wanner; Alberto Zambon; Paul Zimmet Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2008-11-17 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Karim El Harchaoui; Benoit J Arsenault; Remco Franssen; Jean-Pierre Després; G Kees Hovingh; Erik S G Stroes; James D Otvos; Nicholas J Wareham; John J P Kastelein; Kay-Tee Khaw; S Matthijs Boekholdt Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2009-01-20 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Benjamin F Voight; Gina M Peloso; Marju Orho-Melander; Ruth Frikke-Schmidt; Maja Barbalic; Majken K Jensen; George Hindy; Hilma Hólm; Eric L Ding; Toby Johnson; Heribert Schunkert; Nilesh J Samani; Robert Clarke; Jemma C Hopewell; John F Thompson; Mingyao Li; Gudmar Thorleifsson; Christopher Newton-Cheh; Kiran Musunuru; James P Pirruccello; Danish Saleheen; Li Chen; Alexandre F R Stewart; Arne Schillert; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; Gudmundur Thorgeirsson; Sonia Anand; James C Engert; Thomas Morgan; John Spertus; Monika Stoll; Klaus Berger; Nicola Martinelli; Domenico Girelli; Pascal P McKeown; Christopher C Patterson; Stephen E Epstein; Joseph Devaney; Mary-Susan Burnett; Vincent Mooser; Samuli Ripatti; Ida Surakka; Markku S Nieminen; Juha Sinisalo; Marja-Liisa Lokki; Markus Perola; Aki Havulinna; Ulf de Faire; Bruna Gigante; Erik Ingelsson; Tanja Zeller; Philipp Wild; Paul I W de Bakker; Olaf H Klungel; Anke-Hilse Maitland-van der Zee; Bas J M Peters; Anthonius de Boer; Diederick E Grobbee; Pieter W Kamphuisen; Vera H M Deneer; Clara C Elbers; N Charlotte Onland-Moret; Marten H Hofker; Cisca Wijmenga; W M Monique Verschuren; Jolanda M A Boer; Yvonne T van der Schouw; Asif Rasheed; Philippe Frossard; Serkalem Demissie; Cristen Willer; Ron Do; Jose M Ordovas; Gonçalo R Abecasis; Michael Boehnke; Karen L Mohlke; Mark J Daly; Candace Guiducci; Noël P Burtt; Aarti Surti; Elena Gonzalez; Shaun Purcell; Stacey Gabriel; Jaume Marrugat; John Peden; Jeanette Erdmann; Patrick Diemert; Christina Willenborg; Inke R König; Marcus Fischer; Christian Hengstenberg; Andreas Ziegler; Ian Buysschaert; Diether Lambrechts; Frans Van de Werf; Keith A Fox; Nour Eddine El Mokhtari; Diana Rubin; Jürgen Schrezenmeir; Stefan Schreiber; Arne Schäfer; John Danesh; Stefan Blankenberg; Robert Roberts; Ruth McPherson; Hugh Watkins; Alistair S Hall; Kim Overvad; Eric Rimm; Eric Boerwinkle; Anne Tybjaerg-Hansen; L Adrienne Cupples; Muredach P Reilly; Olle Melander; Pier M Mannucci; Diego Ardissino; David Siscovick; Roberto Elosua; Kari Stefansson; Christopher J O'Donnell; Veikko Salomaa; Daniel J Rader; Leena Peltonen; Stephen M Schwartz; David Altshuler; Sekar Kathiresan Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-05-17 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Samar R El Khoudary; Patrick M Hutchins; Karen A Matthews; Maria M Brooks; Trevor J Orchard; Graziella E Ronsein; Jay W Heinecke Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2016-07-11 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Graziella E Ronsein; Patrick M Hutchins; Daniel Isquith; Tomas Vaisar; Xue-Qiao Zhao; Jay W Heinecke Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2015-12-17 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Griffith Bell; Samia Mora; Philip Greenland; Michael Tsai; Ed Gill; Joel D Kaufman Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2017-04-13 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Maria M Llabre; William Arguelles; Neil Schneiderman; Linda C Gallo; Martha L Daviglus; Earle C Chambers; Daniela Sotres-Alvarez; Diana A Chirinos; Gregory A Talavera; Sheila F Castaneda; Scott C Roesch; Gerardo Heiss Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2015-02-19 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Amy S Shah; W Sean Davidson; Zhiqian Gao; Lawrence M Dolan; Thomas R Kimball; Elaine M Urbina Journal: J Clin Lipidol Date: 2016-02-16 Impact factor: 4.766