Samia Mora1, Michael P Caulfield2, Jay Wohlgemuth2, Zhihong Chen2, H Robert Superko2, Charles M Rowland2, Robert J Glynn2, Paul M Ridker2, Ronald M Krauss2. 1. From the Divisions of Preventive (S.M., R.J.G., P.MR.) and Cardiovascular Medicine (S.M., P.MR.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Quest Diagnostics, Alameda, CA (M.P.C., J.W., Z.C., C.M.R.); Cholesterol, Genetics, and Heart Disease Institute, Carmel, CA (H.R.S.); and Children's Hospital Oakland Research Institute, Oakland, CA (R.M.K.). smora@partners.org. 2. From the Divisions of Preventive (S.M., R.J.G., P.MR.) and Cardiovascular Medicine (S.M., P.MR.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Quest Diagnostics, Alameda, CA (M.P.C., J.W., Z.C., C.M.R.); Cholesterol, Genetics, and Heart Disease Institute, Carmel, CA (H.R.S.); and Children's Hospital Oakland Research Institute, Oakland, CA (R.M.K.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Cardiovascular disease (CVD) can occur in individuals with low low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (LDL-C). We investigated whether detailed measures of LDL subfractions and other lipoproteins can be used to assess CVD risk in a population with both low LDL-C and high C-reactive protein who were randomized to high-intensity statin orplacebo. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 11 186 Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: An Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER) participants, we tested whether lipids, apolipoproteins, and ion mobility-measured particle concentrations at baseline and after random allocation to rosuvastatin 20 mg/d or placebo were associated with first CVD events (n=307) or CVD/all-cause death (n=522). In placebo-allocated participants, baseline LDL-C was not associated with CVD (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] per SD, 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-1.21). In contrast, associations with CVD events were observed for baseline non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.01-1.38), apolipoprotein B (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.11-1.48), and ion mobility-measured non-HDL particles (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.05-1.35) and LDL particles (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.07-1.37). Association with CVD events was also observed for several LDL and very-low-density lipoprotein subfractions but not for ion mobility-measured HDL subfractions. In statin-allocated participants, CVD events were associated with on-treatment LDL-C, non-HDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B; these were also associated with CVD/all-cause death, as were several LDL and very-low-density lipoprotein subfractions, albeit with a pattern of association that differed from the baseline risk. CONCLUSIONS: In JUPITER, baseline LDL-C was not associated with CVD events, in contrast with significant associations for non-HDL cholesterol and atherogenic particles: apolipoprotein B and ion mobility-measured non-HDL particles, LDL particles, and select subfractions of very-low-density lipoprotein particles and LDL particles. During high-intensity statin therapy, on-treatment levels of LDL-C and atherogenic particles were associated with residual risk of CVD/all-cause death. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00239681.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Cardiovascular disease (CVD) can occur in individuals with low low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (LDL-C). We investigated whether detailed measures of LDL subfractions and other lipoproteins can be used to assess CVD risk in a population with both low LDL-C and high C-reactive protein who were randomized to high-intensity statin or placebo. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 11 186 Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: An Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER) participants, we tested whether lipids, apolipoproteins, and ion mobility-measured particle concentrations at baseline and after random allocation to rosuvastatin 20 mg/d or placebo were associated with first CVD events (n=307) or CVD/all-cause death (n=522). In placebo-allocated participants, baseline LDL-C was not associated with CVD (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] per SD, 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-1.21). In contrast, associations with CVD events were observed for baseline non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.01-1.38), apolipoprotein B (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.11-1.48), and ion mobility-measured non-HDL particles (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.05-1.35) and LDL particles (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.07-1.37). Association with CVD events was also observed for several LDL and very-low-density lipoprotein subfractions but not for ion mobility-measured HDL subfractions. In statin-allocated participants, CVD events were associated with on-treatment LDL-C, non-HDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B; these were also associated with CVD/all-cause death, as were several LDL and very-low-density lipoprotein subfractions, albeit with a pattern of association that differed from the baseline risk. CONCLUSIONS: In JUPITER, baseline LDL-C was not associated with CVD events, in contrast with significant associations for non-HDL cholesterol and atherogenic particles: apolipoprotein B and ion mobility-measured non-HDL particles, LDL particles, and select subfractions of very-low-density lipoprotein particles and LDL particles. During high-intensity statin therapy, on-treatment levels of LDL-C and atherogenic particles were associated with residual risk of CVD/all-cause death. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00239681.
Authors: Allan D Sniderman; Annie C St-Pierre; Bernard Cantin; Gilles R Dagenais; Jean-Pierre Després; Benoît Lamarche Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2003-05-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: S S Soedamah-Muthu; H M Colhoun; M J Thomason; D J Betteridge; P N Durrington; G A Hitman; J H Fuller; K Julier; M I Mackness; H A W Neil Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Yuan Lu; Shengfan Zhou; Rachel P Dreyer; Michael Caulfield; Erica S Spatz; Mary Geda; Nancy P Lorenze; Peter Herbert; Gail D'Onofrio; Elizabeth A Jackson; Judith H Lichtman; Héctor Bueno; John A Spertus; Harlan M Krumholz Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2016-10-03 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Kathleen E Corey; Laura A Wilson; Akif Altinbas; Katherine P Yates; David E Kleiner; Raymond T Chung; Ronald M Krauss; Naga Chalasani Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2019-03-10 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: Sally Chiu; Nathalie Bergeron; Paul T Williams; George A Bray; Barbara Sutherland; Ronald M Krauss Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2015-12-30 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Samar R El Khoudary; Indre Ceponiene; Saad Samargandy; James H Stein; Dong Li; Matthew C Tattersall; Matthew J Budoff Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Andrew A Butler; James L Graham; Kimber L Stanhope; So Wong; Sarah King; Andrew A Bremer; Ronald M Krauss; James Hamilton; Peter J Havel Journal: J Lipid Res Date: 2020-01-09 Impact factor: 5.922