Literature DB >> 22513367

The basis for spinal manipulation: chiropractic perspective of indications and theory.

Charles N R Henderson1.   

Abstract

It is reasonable to think that patients responding to spinal manipulation (SM), a mechanically based therapy, would have mechanical derangement of the spine as a critical causal component in the mechanism of their condition. Consequently, SM practitioners routinely assess intervertebral motion, and treat patients on the basis of those assessments. In chiropractic practice, the vertebral subluxation has been the historical raison d'etre for SM. Vertebral subluxation is a biomechanical spine derangement thought to produce clinically significant effects by disturbing neurological function. This paper reviews the putative mechanical features of the subluxation and three theories that form the foundation for much of chiropractic practice. It concludes with discussion of subluxation as an indicator for SM therapy, particularly from the perspective that subluxation may be one contributory cause of ill-health within a "web of causation".
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22513367     DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2012.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol        ISSN: 1050-6411            Impact factor:   2.368


  20 in total

1.  What effect can manual therapy have on a patient's pain experience?

Authors:  Mark D Bishop; Rafael Torres-Cueco; Charles W Gay; Enrique Lluch-Girbés; Jason M Beneciuk; Joel E Bialosky
Journal:  Pain Manag       Date:  2015-09-24

2.  Manual physical therapy for chronic pain: the complex whole is greater than the sum of its parts.

Authors:  Rogelio A Coronado; Joel E Bialosky
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2017-06-12

3.  Influence of body position and axial load on spinal stiffness in healthy young adults.

Authors:  Melanie Häusler; Léonie Hofstetter; Petra Schweinhardt; Jaap Swanenburg
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Neural responses to the mechanical parameters of a high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulation: effect of preload parameters.

Authors:  William R Reed; Cynthia R Long; Gregory N Kawchuk; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 1.437

5.  The Physiological Role of Tumor Necrosis Factor in Human Immunity and Its Potential Implications in Spinal Manipulative Therapy: A Narrative Literature Review.

Authors:  Liang Zhang; Chao Hua Yao
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2016-05-26

6.  Effect of changing lumbar stiffness by single facet joint dysfunction on the responsiveness of lumbar muscle spindles to vertebral movement.

Authors:  William R Reed; Joel G Pickar; Cynthia R Long
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2014-06

7.  Criterion validity of manual assessment of spinal stiffness.

Authors:  Shane L Koppenhaver; Jeffrey J Hebert; Greg N Kawchuk; John D Childs; Deydre S Teyhen; Theodore Croy; Julie M Fritz
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2014-06-12

8.  Changes in Quality of Life in 7 Older Adult Patients Receiving Activator Methods Chiropractic Technique.

Authors:  David G Russell; Melissa N Kimura; Harriet R Cowie; Caroline M M de Groot; Elise A P McMinn; Matthew W Sherson
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2016-03-25

9.  Effects of unilateral facet fixation and facetectomy on muscle spindle responsiveness during simulated spinal manipulation in an animal model.

Authors:  William R Reed; Cynthia R Long; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 1.437

10.  Effect of spinal manipulation thrust duration on trunk mechanical activation thresholds of nociceptive-specific lateral thalamic neurons.

Authors:  William R Reed; Randall Sozio; Joel G Pickar; Stephen M Onifer
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 1.437

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.