Melanie Häusler1, Léonie Hofstetter1, Petra Schweinhardt1, Jaap Swanenburg2. 1. Integrative Spinal Research ISR, Department of Chiropractic Medicine, Balgrist University Hospital, Balgrist Campus, Lengghalde 5, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland. 2. Integrative Spinal Research ISR, Department of Chiropractic Medicine, Balgrist University Hospital, Balgrist Campus, Lengghalde 5, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland. jaap.swanenburg@balgrist.ch.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aimed at investigating the effects of different body positions and axial loads on spinal stiffness to better understand spinal stabilisation mechanisms. METHODS: The posterior-to-anterior lumbar and thoracic spinal stiffness of 100 young healthy adults (mean age 23 years; 50 females) were measured in three test situations: prone, standing and standing while carrying a load equal to 50% of the subject's body weight. Each test situation comprised three trials. RESULTS: Spinal stiffness in all test situations showed good reliability. Repeated measures analysis of covariance showed significantly higher spinal stiffness in standing than in the prone position [F(1/1694) = 433.630, p < 0.001]. However, spinal stiffness was significantly lower when standing while carrying a load of 50% of the body weight than when standing without additional load [F(1/1494) = 754.358, p < 0.001]. CONCLUSION: This study showed that spinal lumbar and thoracic stiffness increases when body position is changed from prone to standing. Additional axial load of 50% of the subject's body weight results in reduced spinal stiffness during standing. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
PURPOSE: This study aimed at investigating the effects of different body positions and axial loads on spinal stiffness to better understand spinal stabilisation mechanisms. METHODS: The posterior-to-anterior lumbar and thoracic spinal stiffness of 100 young healthy adults (mean age 23 years; 50 females) were measured in three test situations: prone, standing and standing while carrying a load equal to 50% of the subject's body weight. Each test situation comprised three trials. RESULTS:Spinal stiffness in all test situations showed good reliability. Repeated measures analysis of covariance showed significantly higher spinal stiffness in standing than in the prone position [F(1/1694) = 433.630, p < 0.001]. However, spinal stiffness was significantly lower when standing while carrying a load of 50% of the body weight than when standing without additional load [F(1/1494) = 754.358, p < 0.001]. CONCLUSION: This study showed that spinal lumbar and thoracic stiffness increases when body position is changed from prone to standing. Additional axial load of 50% of the subject's body weight results in reduced spinal stiffness during standing. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Authors: Jaap Swanenburg; Michael L Meier; Anke Langenfeld; Petra Schweinhardt; B Kim Humphreys Journal: Aerosp Med Hum Perform Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 1.053