BACKGROUND: Delirium frequently occurs in hospitalised older adults leading to poor outcomes and frequent adverse events. Proper recognition and management of delirium by acute care nurses can minimise the effects of negative sequelae associated with delirium. AIM: This pilot study used focus group methodology to: (i) describe acute care nurse's experience and knowledge regarding assessment and management of delirium in hospitalised older adults; (ii) illustrate potential facilitators and barriers to non-drug management of delirium; and (iii) to explicate the use of non-drug interventions by acute care nurses to manage delirium in hospitalised older adults. DESIGN: Qualitative, pilot study. METHODS: A total of 16 nurse participants, working on medical, surgical and orthopaedic units from one acute care hospital participated in two focus groups. RESULTS: Main themes included the following: confusion is normal; our duty is to protect; and finding a balance. Nurses were able to identify non-pharmacological interventions for delirium and facilitators and barriers to using these in clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this pilot study illustrate the need for regular assessment of cognitive status in hospitalised older adults and nursing staff education regarding the use of non-pharmacological management of delirium. Based on their experience, nurses have a wealth of ideas for managing delirium. Areas for future research and policy are also highlighted. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: More research is needed on how to improve delirium management by acute care nurses to increase the efficacy and use of non-pharmacological interventions in the management of delirium in hospitalised older adults. To translate these findings into practice, nursing care needs to be guided by evidence-based guidelines to implement non-pharmacological strategies in the acute care setting.
BACKGROUND:Delirium frequently occurs in hospitalised older adults leading to poor outcomes and frequent adverse events. Proper recognition and management of delirium by acute care nurses can minimise the effects of negative sequelae associated with delirium. AIM: This pilot study used focus group methodology to: (i) describe acute care nurse's experience and knowledge regarding assessment and management of delirium in hospitalised older adults; (ii) illustrate potential facilitators and barriers to non-drug management of delirium; and (iii) to explicate the use of non-drug interventions by acute care nurses to manage delirium in hospitalised older adults. DESIGN: Qualitative, pilot study. METHODS: A total of 16 nurse participants, working on medical, surgical and orthopaedic units from one acute care hospital participated in two focus groups. RESULTS: Main themes included the following: confusion is normal; our duty is to protect; and finding a balance. Nurses were able to identify non-pharmacological interventions for delirium and facilitators and barriers to using these in clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this pilot study illustrate the need for regular assessment of cognitive status in hospitalised older adults and nursing staff education regarding the use of non-pharmacological management of delirium. Based on their experience, nurses have a wealth of ideas for managing delirium. Areas for future research and policy are also highlighted. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: More research is needed on how to improve delirium management by acute care nurses to increase the efficacy and use of non-pharmacological interventions in the management of delirium in hospitalised older adults. To translate these findings into practice, nursing care needs to be guided by evidence-based guidelines to implement non-pharmacological strategies in the acute care setting.
Authors: Juho Uusvaara; Kaisu H Pitkala; Hannu Kautiainen; Reijo S Tilvis; Timo E Strandberg Journal: Drugs Aging Date: 2011-02-01 Impact factor: 3.923
Authors: Najma Siddiqi; John Young; Allan O House; Imogen Featherstone; Ann Hopton; Carol Martin; Jill Edwards; Rebecca Krishnan; Rose Peacock; Rachel Holt Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2010-09-22 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Alessandro Morandi; Eduard E Vasilevskis; Pratik P Pandharipande; Timothy D Girard; Laurence M Solberg; Erin B Neal; Tyler Koestner; Renee Torres; Jennifer L Thompson; Ayumi K Shintani; Jin H Han; John Schnelle; Donna M Fick; E Wesley Ely; Sunil Kripalani Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2011-06-13
Authors: S K Inouye; S T Bogardus; P A Charpentier; L Leo-Summers; D Acampora; T R Holford; L M Cooney Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1999-03-04 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Martin G Cole; Jane McCusker; François Bellavance; François J Primeau; Robert F Bailey; Michael J Bonnycastle; Johanne Laplante Journal: CMAJ Date: 2002-10-01 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Shirley H Bush; Eduardo Bruera; Peter G Lawlor; Salmaan Kanji; Daniel H J Davis; Meera Agar; David Kenneth Wright; Michael Hartwick; David C Currow; Bruno Gagnon; Jessica Simon; José L Pereira Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2014-04-21 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Andrea M Yevchak; Kelly Doherty; Elizabeth G Archambault; Brittany Kelly; Jennifer R Fonda; James L Rudolph Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2015-09-16 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Douglas L Leslie; Donna M Fick; Amber Moore; Sharon K Inouye; Yoojin Jung; Long H Ngo; Marie Boltz; Erica Husser; Priyanka Shrestha; Malaz Boustani; Edward R Marcantonio Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2022-04-20 Impact factor: 7.538
Authors: Jennifer L Y Tsang; Katie Ross; Franziska Miller; Ramez Maximous; Priscilla Yung; Carl Marshall; Mercedes Camargo; Dimitra Fleming; Madelyn Law Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-04-04 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Domingo Palacios-Ceña; José Miguel Cachón-Pérez; Rosa Martínez-Piedrola; Javier Gueita-Rodriguez; Marta Perez-de-Heredia; Cesar Fernández-de-las-Peñas Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2016-01-29 Impact factor: 2.692