Andrea M Yevchak1, Kelly Doherty2, Elizabeth G Archambault2, Brittany Kelly2,3, Jennifer R Fonda2,4, James L Rudolph2,5,6. 1. College of Nursing, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania. 2. Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. School of Nursing, Science and Health Professions, Regis College, Boston, Massachusetts. 4. Department of Epidemiology, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts. 5. Division of Aging, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 6. Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Though often recommended, hospital cognitive assessment is infrequently completed due to clinical and time constraints. OBJECTIVE: This analysis aimed to evaluate the relationship between performance on ultrabrief cognitive screening instruments and hospital outcomes. DESIGN: This is a secondary data analysis of a quality improvement project. SETTING: Tertiary Veterans Administration hospital in New England. PATIENTS: Patients, ≥ 60 years old, admitted to the hospital. INTERVENTION: None. MEASUREMENTS: Upon admission, patients were administered 2 cognitive screening tools. The modified Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (mRASS) is a measure of arousal that can be completed in 15 seconds. The months of the year backward (MOYB) is a measure of attention that can be administered in ≤1 minute. In-hospital outcomes included restraints and mortality, whereas discharge outcomes included length of stay, discharge not home, and variable direct costs. Risk ratios were calculated for dichotomous outcomes and unadjusted Poisson regression for continuous outcomes. RESULTS: Patients (n = 3232) were screened. Altered arousal occurred in 15% of patients (n = 495); incorrect MOYB was recorded in 45% (n = 1457). Relative to those with normal arousal and attention, those with abnormal mRASS and incorrect MOYB had increased length of stay (incident rate ratio [IRR]: 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.17-1.30); restraint use (risk ratio [RR]: 5.05, 95% CI: 3.29-7.75), in-hospital mortality (RR: 3.46, 95% CI: 1.24-9.63), and decreased discharge home (RR: 2.97, 95% CI: 2.42-3.64). Hospital variable direct costs were slightly, but not significantly, higher (IRR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.88-1.17). CONCLUSION: Impaired performance on ultrabrief cognitive assessments of arousal and attention provide valuable insights regarding hospital outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Though often recommended, hospital cognitive assessment is infrequently completed due to clinical and time constraints. OBJECTIVE: This analysis aimed to evaluate the relationship between performance on ultrabrief cognitive screening instruments and hospital outcomes. DESIGN: This is a secondary data analysis of a quality improvement project. SETTING: Tertiary Veterans Administration hospital in New England. PATIENTS: Patients, ≥ 60 years old, admitted to the hospital. INTERVENTION: None. MEASUREMENTS: Upon admission, patients were administered 2 cognitive screening tools. The modified Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (mRASS) is a measure of arousal that can be completed in 15 seconds. The months of the year backward (MOYB) is a measure of attention that can be administered in ≤1 minute. In-hospital outcomes included restraints and mortality, whereas discharge outcomes included length of stay, discharge not home, and variable direct costs. Risk ratios were calculated for dichotomous outcomes and unadjusted Poisson regression for continuous outcomes. RESULTS:Patients (n = 3232) were screened. Altered arousal occurred in 15% of patients (n = 495); incorrect MOYB was recorded in 45% (n = 1457). Relative to those with normal arousal and attention, those with abnormal mRASS and incorrect MOYB had increased length of stay (incident rate ratio [IRR]: 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.17-1.30); restraint use (risk ratio [RR]: 5.05, 95% CI: 3.29-7.75), in-hospital mortality (RR: 3.46, 95% CI: 1.24-9.63), and decreased discharge home (RR: 2.97, 95% CI: 2.42-3.64). Hospital variable direct costs were slightly, but not significantly, higher (IRR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.88-1.17). CONCLUSION: Impaired performance on ultrabrief cognitive assessments of arousal and attention provide valuable insights regarding hospital outcomes.
Authors: Samuel E Simon; Margaret A Bergmann; Richard N Jones; Katherine M Murphy; E John Orav; Edward R Marcantonio Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2006-05-30 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Andrea M Yevchak; Donna M Fick; Jane McDowell; Todd Monroe; Kanah May; Lori Grove; Ann M Kolanowski; Jennifer L Waller; Sharon K Inouye Journal: Clin Nurs Res Date: 2013-10-11 Impact factor: 2.075
Authors: S K Inouye; S T Bogardus; P A Charpentier; L Leo-Summers; D Acampora; T R Holford; L M Cooney Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1999-03-04 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: James L Rudolph; Sharon K Inouye; Richard N Jones; Frances M Yang; Tamara G Fong; Sue E Levkoff; Edward R Marcantonio Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2010-03-22 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: James L Rudolph; Richard N Jones; Sue E Levkoff; Christopher Rockett; Sharon K Inouye; Frank W Sellke; Shukri F Khuri; Lewis A Lipsitz; Basel Ramlawi; Sidney Levitsky; Edward R Marcantonio Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-12-31 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Melanie Boly; Anil K Seth; Melanie Wilke; Paul Ingmundson; Bernard Baars; Steven Laureys; David B Edelman; Naotsugu Tsuchiya Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2013-10-31
Authors: Annachiara Marra; James C Jackson; E Wesley Ely; Amy J Graves; John F Schnelle; Robert S Dittus; Amanda Wilson; Jin H Han Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2018-03-26 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Yuta Katsumi; Bonnie Wong; Michele Cavallari; Tamara G Fong; David C Alsop; Joseph M Andreano; Nicole Carvalho; Michael Brickhouse; Richard Jones; Towia A Libermann; Edward R Marcantonio; Eva Schmitt; Mouhsin M Shafi; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Thomas Travison; Lisa Feldman Barrett; Sharon K Inouye; Bradford C Dickerson; Alexandra Touroutoglou Journal: Brain Commun Date: 2022-06-28
Authors: Jin H Han; Nathan E Brummel; Rameela Chandrasekhar; Jo Ellen Wilson; Xulei Liu; Eduard E Vasilevskis; Timothy D Girard; Maria E Carlo; Robert S Dittus; John F Schnelle; E Wesley Ely Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2016-07-04 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: David E Hamilton; Valerie G Press; Nicole M Twu; Trevor C Yuen; Crystal N Azu; Matthew M Churpek; Dana P Edelson Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2016-02-16 Impact factor: 2.960