| Literature DB >> 22511919 |
Aleksandra W Debowski1, Christophe Carnoy, Phebe Verbrugghe, Hans-Olof Nilsson, Jonathan C Gauntlett, Alma Fulurija, Tania Camilleri, Douglas E Berg, Barry J Marshall, Mohammed Benghezal.
Abstract
In the model organism E. coli, recombination mediated by the related XerC and XerD recombinases complexed with the FtsK translocase at specialized dif sites, resolves dimeric chromosomes into free monomers to allow efficient chromosome segregation at cell division. Computational genome analysis of Helicobacter pylori, a slow growing gastric pathogen, identified just one chromosomal xer gene (xerH) and its cognate dif site (difH). Here we show that recombination between directly repeated difH sites requires XerH, FtsK but not XerT, the TnPZ transposon associated recombinase. xerH inactivation was not lethal, but resulted in increased DNA per cell, suggesting defective chromosome segregation. The xerH mutant also failed to colonize mice, and was more susceptible to UV and ciprofloxacin, which induce DNA breakage, and thereby recombination and chromosome dimer formation. xerH inactivation and overexpression each led to a DNA segregation defect, suggesting a role for Xer recombination in regulation of replication. In addition to chromosome dimer resolution and based on the absence of genes for topoisomerase IV (parC, parE) in H. pylori, we speculate that XerH may contribute to chromosome decatenation, although possible involvement of H. pylori's DNA gyrase and topoisomerase III homologue are also considered. Further analyses of this system should contribute to general understanding of and possibly therapy development for H. pylori, which causes peptic ulcers and gastric cancer; for the closely related, diarrheagenic Campylobacter species; and for unrelated slow growing pathogens that lack topoisomerase IV, such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22511919 PMCID: PMC3325230 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033310
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1XerH/difH site-specific recombination assay in Helicobacter pylori.
(A) Schematic depiction of XerH excision assay. The difH repeat cassette, consisting of streptomycin susceptibility-chloramphenicol resistance genes (rpsL-cat) flanked by difH sequence, was introduced into the H. pylori 26695Str (WT) genome by natural transformation and homologous recombination between genes HP0203 and HP0204 or in place of genes ureA and ureB. Recombination at difH sites leads to excision of rpsL-cat and one difH sequence, detectable by a PCR fragment 1.5 kb smaller than that from parental difH repeat cassette containing DNA. A cassette with nondif sequence flanking rpsL-cat served as a negative control. (B) Results of difH recombination assay in H. pylori 26695Str (WT) with 40 bp difH direct repeats or 40 bp nondif DNA direct repeats at the HP0203-HP0204 locus. With each of these cassettes, two independent clones were tested by diagnostic PCR. The 2.1 kb and 3.6 kb PCR products come difH recombinant and parental (difH repeat containing) DNAs, respectively. Lane C, control from wild-type H. pylori without difH repeat cassette. (C) difH recombination frequencies for difH repeat cassette located at HP0203-HP0204 or ureAB loci. Cells were grown on non-selective media for two or four days, re-streaked for single colonies, and ∼100–200 colonies were tested for retention or loss of rpsL and cat genes by replica plating to streptomycin and to chloramphenicol containing media. Experiments were performed in triplicates; horizontal bars indicate means and standard deviation.
Figure 2XerH is required for recombination at difH sites whereas XerT is not.
PCR-based difH recombination was assayed in H. pylori 26695Str (WT) and isogenic derivatives harbouring the difH repeat cassette after growth on non-selective media, essentially as in Figure 1. Two independent transformant clones of each strain were tested. The PCR product from control DNA (lane C), which did not have a difH repeat cassette, is slightly smaller than the product reflecting difH recombination because it does not contain the single copy of difH that remains after recombination (See Figure 1A). (A) Tests of difH recombination in WT and ΔxerH and ΔxerT derivatives, harbouring difH repeat cassette at the ureAB locus. (B) Tests of difH recombination in WT, ΔxerH, and ΔxerT derivatives, harbouring difH repeat cassette at the HP0203-HP0204 locus strains. (C) Tests of difH recombination in WT, ΔxerH and ΔxerH complemented with a highly expressed xerH gene using strains with the difH cassette at the ureAB locus.
Consensus difH sequence obtained from complete H. pylori genomes.
|
|
|
| 35A |
|
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
|
| 83 |
|
| 908 |
|
| 2017 |
|
| 2018 |
|
| 26695 |
|
| B8 |
|
| B38 |
|
| Cuz20 |
|
| F16 |
|
| F30 |
|
| F32 |
|
| F57 |
|
| G27 |
|
| Gambia94/24 |
|
| HPAG1 |
|
| India7 |
|
| J99 |
|
| Lithuania75 |
|
| P12 |
|
| PeCan4 |
|
| Puno135 |
|
| Puno120 |
|
| Sat464 |
|
| Shi470 |
|
| SJM180 |
|
| SNT49 |
|
| SouthAfrica7 |
|
| v225d |
|
| ---------***************--*-********-*****--**-*-* | |
|
| WWWWYYHWK |
| ------------**----*-**------**-*---*--*----------- | |
|
| -----------GGTGCGCATAATGTATATTATGTTAAATC---------- |
difH sequences were retrieved from H. pylori complete genome sequences downloaded from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov).
Blakely GW, Davidson AO, Sherratt DJ (1997) Binding and cleavage of nicked substrates by site-specific recombinases XerC and XerD. J Mol Biol 265: 30–39.
Consensus dif sequence obtained from 24 epsilon proteobacteria species.
| Species |
| |
| Campylobacteraceae | ||
| Arcobacter: |
|
|
|
|
| |
| Campylobacter: |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| Sulfurospirillum: |
|
|
| Helicobacteraceae | ||
| Helicobacter: |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| Wolinella: |
|
|
| Nitratiruptor |
|
|
|
| TTTTaTTATTTTGTAT |
Uncompleted genome sequences were noticed as “uncompl.”.
Nucleotides in bold characters are common to all 24 dif sequences.
If the nucleotide frequency represents more than 50%, the nucleotide is written in upper case letters; otherwise, the nucleotide is written in lower case letters.
Figure 3difH sequences.
(A) difH consensus sequence and nucleotide variability for difH sequences from 24 epsilon- proteobacterial species (Table 2). If a given nucleotide is present in more than 50% of species it is written in upper case; if not, the most frequent nucleotide is in lower case. The nucleotide variability at each position was defined as 1–f, where f is the frequency of the most frequent nucleotide. (B) Palindromicity was analysed by comparing the 50-nt difH sequence with its inverted complementary counterpart in the 24 epsilon-proteobacterial species (Table 2). When a nucleotide was found both in difH and in the reverse complementary sequence, a value of 1 was given to the position. Next, the values for the 24 difH sequences for each position were added together to give the n value. The palindromicity frequency (fpal) was then estimated as: fpal = n/24, with 24 being the number of difH sequences analysed. A fpal value of 1 given to a nucleotide position means that the nucleotide is always part of a palindrome.
Figure 4XerH-mediated recombination at mutant difH sequences.
(A) The four A's in positions 19 to 22 of the difH sequence were changed to T's (empty stars), the G in position 18 was changed to C (black star) and the C in position 23 was changed to G (grey star). PCR tests were carried out as in Figure 1 on a clone harbouring WT difH repeats and two clones harbouring each mutant difH sequence (same sequence in each copy of difH) as indicated by the stars, difH M1, difH M2 and difH M3. No PCR product reflecting difH recombination was detected in difH M1, difH M2 mutants, whereas a weak band reflecting difH recombination was detected in the two clones with difH M3 sequences. Underlined nucleotides were found in a palindrome in all species studied. (B) difH recombination frequencies for WT difH and the difH M1, difH M2 and difH M3 mutant sequences carried out as in Figure 2B. Experiments were performed in triplicate; horizontal bars indicate means and standard deviations.
Figure 5H. pylori FtsK is required for XerH-mediated recombination.
Recombination at difH sites was scored as in Figure 2A in H. pylori 26695Str (WT) and its derivative containing a C terminal deletion in ftsK, in each case with the difH repeat cassette at the ureAB locus.
Figure 6Phenotypes of H. pylori recombination mutants.
(A) and (B) Electron micrographs. WT and ΔxerH mutant cells were fixed with glutaraldehyde and processed for scanning electron microscopy. Both WT and ΔxerH mutant cells displayed the characteristic curved rod morphology; in contrast to Δxer mutant E. coli, none were filamentous. (C) Growth curves of H. pylori in liquid medium. Cells were grown in BHI liquid medium supplemented with 10% NCS in microaerobic conditions with agitation. The optical densities (OD600 nm) of WT, ΔxerH and complemented strains were measured in triplicate for up to 40 h. (D) UV sensitivity of WT and recombination mutant H. pylori. Cells were exposed to UV light as described in the methods and viable colony forming units (survival) was determined. Each test was repeated at least three times; standard deviation is indicated. (E) UV sensitivity of WT and ftsK mutant H. pylori determined as in part D.
Ciprofloxacin susceptibility of H. pylori strains.
| Strains | MIC (µg/ml)1 |
| Median2 | |
| WT | 0.125 |
| Δ | 0.079 |
|
| 0.250 |
Minimum inhibitory concentration.
95% confidence interval based on the Wilcoxon signed rank test of eight independent experiments.
Figure 7Impaired chromosome segregation in ΔxerH mutant.
The X and Y axes indicate the relative Hoechst fluorescence units and number of H. pylori cells, respectively. Dotted vertical lines indicate genome equivalents. The main fluorescent signal of wild-type H. pylori was considered as one genome equivalent, as described [39].
Figure 8XerH is needed for gastric niche colonization.
H. pylori X47 wild-type (WT) and isogenic ΔxerH and ΔruvC mutants were used to inoculate five to ten eight-week old C57BL/6J mice. Mice were sacrificed and colonisation levels in stomachs were measured as described in the methods. Data is presented as a scatter plot with each point representing the CFU count of one mouse stomach, and the solid line the geometric mean ± standard deviation for each group (WT, ΔxerH, and ΔruvC).
Figure 9Phylogeny of archaeal and bacterial single-Xer recombinases.
Species are representative of their respective taxonomic groups. XerC and XerD from E. coli and XerT from H. pylori were included in the study as reference. Amino acid sequence alignments were performed using Clustal W. The phylogenetic analyses, using the Neighbour-Joining method [34] were conducted in MEGA4 [33]. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) is shown next to the branches. The bootstrap consensus tree is taken to represent the evolutionary history of the taxa analysed. For each species, the accession number is indicated as well as the number of amino acid residues composing the recombinase.