Literature DB >> 22511541

Percutaneous retrograde left ventricular assist support for interventions in patients with aortic stenosis and left ventricular dysfunction.

Claudia A Martinez1, Vikas Singh, Juan C Londoño, Mauricio G Cohen, Carlos E Alfonso, William W O'Neill, Alan W Heldman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate feasibility and technical outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) who have undergone high-risk procedures with continuous flow left ventricular (LV) assist, with the Impella 2.5 system (Abiomed, Danvers, MA).
BACKGROUND: In preparation for transcatheter aortic valve implantation, an increasing number of high-risk patients with severe AS and left ventricular dysfunction are currently considered for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV). Hemodynamic support may be required in some patients.
METHODS: We reviewed procedural and clinical findings and 30-day outcomes in patients with symptomatic AS who underwent high-risk percutaneous procedures supported by the Impella 2.5 system. All patients carried a high-risk of operative mortality. Impella was used during PCI, BAV, and for hemodynamic support during emergencies.
RESULTS: Over a 14-month period, 21 patients with AS underwent insertion of Impella prior to high-risk PCI (n = 3), BAV with subsequent PCI (n = 8), BAV alone (n = 7), or during cardiac arrest immediately following BAV (n = 3). The mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) predicted mortality risk was 14% (range 7.3-24.7%). Impella was inserted successfully in all patients attempted. Retrograde advancement of two catheters across the aortic valve (for concomitant BAV in 15 patients) was technically feasible. Retrograde continuous flow LV assist produced a reduction in LV end-diastolic pressure and an increase in arterial pressure. Periprocedural complications occurred in 19% (n = 4) patients, with no periprocedural deaths. Mortality at 30 days was 14.2%.
CONCLUSION: Our data suggests that continuous flow LV assist with Impella 2.5 can be used in high-risk patients with severe AS who require periprocedural hemodynamic support.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22511541     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.24303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  9 in total

Review 1.  Mechanical circulatory support in patients with severe aortic stenosis and left ventricular dysfunction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Mohamad Alkhouli; Ahmed Al Mustafa; Zakeih Chaker; Fahad Alqahtani; Sami Aljohani; David R Holmes
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 1.620

Review 2.  The Impella Device: Historical Background, Clinical Applications and Future Directions.

Authors:  James J Glazier; Amir Kaki
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2018-12-20

Review 3.  The Role of Impella for Hemodynamic Support in Patients With Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Vikas Singh; Rodrigo Mendirichaga; Ignacio Inglessis-Azuaje; Igor F Palacios; William W O'Neill
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-04-23

4.  Impella CP-assisted balloon aortic valvuloplasty.

Authors:  Michael Megaly; Paul Jones
Journal:  J Cardiol Cases       Date:  2016-04-12

5.  Percutaneous Mechanical Ventricular Support in Acute Cardiac Care: A UK Quaternary Centre Experience Using 2.5L, 3.8L and 5.0L Impella Catheters.

Authors:  Vinod Venugopal; Jon Spiro; Alex Zaphiriou; Sohail Khan; Jonathan N Townend; Peter F Ludman; Sagar N Doshi
Journal:  Cardiol Ther       Date:  2014-12-17

6.  The Long Road to the Left Main: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Revascularization of Complex Left Main Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Scott Donald; Hilary Bews; Chantal Asselin; Basem Elbarouni; David Allen; Malek Kass; Siuchan Sookhoo; Davinder S Jassal
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-03-06

Review 7.  Utilization of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction and High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.

Authors:  Rabea Asleh; Jon R Resar
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Intensive care unit management of percutaneous mechanical circulatory supported patients: the role of imaging.

Authors:  Andrea Montisci; Letizia F Bertoldi; Susanna Price; Christian Hassager; Jacob Møller; Federico Pappalardo
Journal:  Eur Heart J Suppl       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 1.803

Review 9.  Ventricular Unloading Using the ImpellaTM Device in Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Adrian Attinger-Toller; Matthias Bossard; Giacomo Maria Cioffi; Gregorio Tersalvi; Mehdi Madanchi; Andreas Bloch; Richard Kobza; Florim Cuculi
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-03-23
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.