| Literature DB >> 30546662 |
Abstract
Percutaneous ventricular assist device (PVAD) use in balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) has been performed sporadically. The PVAD used was TandemHeart. A few cases were reported using Impella 2.5 device. We report the first case of Impella CP-assisted BAV. The use of PVAD has been contraindicated in severe aortic stenosis (AS). However, the various benefits of PVAD, including circulatory support and minimizing interruption of blood flow during balloon inflation, made its use attractive in high-risk BAV. We recommend that severe AS no more stays as a contraindication to the use of PVADs. <Learning objective: There are various benefits of using percutaneous ventricular assist devices (PVADs) during high-risk balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV). Benefits, including circulatory support and minimizing interruption of blood flow during balloon inflation, made its use attractive in high-risk BAV. We present the good outcome of using Impella CP device in one case of high-risk BAV. We recommend that severe aortic stenosis no more stays as a contraindication to the use of PVADs.>.Entities:
Keywords: Balloon aortic valvuloplasty; Impella CP device; PVAD-assisted balloon aortic valvuloplasty; Severe aortic stenosis
Year: 2016 PMID: 30546662 PMCID: PMC6282924 DOI: 10.1016/j.jccase.2016.03.012
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cardiol Cases ISSN: 1878-5409