Literature DB >> 12921218

Safety and efficacy of pegfilgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.

Jeffrey Crawford1.   

Abstract

The major dose-limiting toxicity associated with myelosuppressive chemotherapy is neutropenia, which can be ameliorated with proactive administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). Pegfilgrastim is a long-acting G-CSF, recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration. The efficacy and safety of pegfilgrastim administered once/chemotherapy cycle have been evaluated in clinical trials involving patients treated with myelosuppressive chemotherapy for breast cancer, lung cancer, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and Hodgkin's disease. Two pivotal phase III trials in patients with breast cancer showed that pegfilgrastim is as effective as filgrastim regarding the primary efficacy end point, which was duration of grade 4 (severe) neutropenia in cycle 1 of myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Secondary end points were the frequency of fever with neutropenia (febrile neutropenia), duration of neutropenia in cycles 2-4, depth of the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) nadir, and time to ANC recovery in cycles 1-4. Once/cycle pegfilgrastim 100 microg/kg or 6 mg was as safe and effective as daily filgrastim 5 microg/kg in reducing the frequency and duration of severe neutropenia. A trend toward a greater reduction in the overall frequency of febrile neutropenia with pegfilgrastim was observed. The availability of pegfilgrastim simplifies the use of prophylactic G-CSF, with the potential to increase patient convenience and adherence in management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12921218     DOI: 10.1592/phco.23.9.15s.32889

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacotherapy        ISSN: 0277-0008            Impact factor:   4.705


  12 in total

Review 1.  Pegfilgrastim vs filgrastim in PBSC mobilization for autologous hematopoietic SCT: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  M G Kim; N Han; E-K Lee; T Kim
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 5.483

2.  Neuroprotective Effects of Filgrastim in Rotenone-Induced Parkinson's Disease in Rats: Insights into its Anti-Inflammatory, Neurotrophic, and Antiapoptotic Effects.

Authors:  Mariama S Azmy; Esther T Menze; Reem N El-Naga; Mariane G Tadros
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 5.590

3.  Prevention of pegfilgrastim-induced bone pain: a phase III double-blind placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial of the university of rochester cancer center clinical community oncology program research base.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Kirshner; Charles E Heckler; Michelle C Janelsins; Shaker R Dakhil; Judith O Hopkins; Charlotte Coles; Gary R Morrow
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Randomized phase II study of loratadine for the prevention of bone pain caused by pegfilgrastim.

Authors:  J Moukharskaya; D M Abrams; T Ashikaga; F Khan; J Schwartz; K Wilson; C Verschraegen; T Openshaw; J Valentine; J Eneman; P Unger; S Ades
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Effect of concomitant use of G-CSF and myelosuppressive chemotherapy on bone marrow and peripheral granulocytes in a mouse model.

Authors:  Yuki Endo; Takeshi Ishikawa; Kaname Oka; Tomoki Sakakida; Shinya Matsumura; Katsura Mizushima; Toshifumi Doi; Tetsuya Okayama; Kazuhiro Katada; Kazuhiro Kamada; Kazuhiko Uchiyama; Tomohisa Takagi; Hitoshi Fujiwara; Hideyuki Konishi; Yuji Naito; Yoshito Itoh
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 3.064

6.  Real-world impact of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor on febrile neutropenia.

Authors:  A K Altwairgi; W M Hopman; M Mates
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.677

7.  NOLAN: a randomized, phase 2 study to estimate the effect of prophylactic naproxen or loratadine vs no prophylactic treatment on bone pain in patients with early-stage breast cancer receiving chemotherapy and pegfilgrastim.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Kirshner; Maxwell C McDonald; Flavio Kruter; Andrew S Guinigundo; Linda Vanni; Cathy L Maxwell; Maureen Reiner; Terry E Upchurch; Jacob Garcia; Phuong Khanh Morrow
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Efficacy and safety of RGB-02, a pegfilgrastim biosimilar to prevent chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: results of a randomized, double-blind phase III clinical study vs. reference pegfilgrastim in patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy.

Authors:  Zsuzsanna Kahan; Daniela Grecea; Martin Smakal; Sergei Tjulandin; Igor Bondarenko; Luca Perjesi; Andras Illes; Karoly Horvat-Karajz; Ildiko Aradi
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Efficacy and safety of two pegfilgrastim biosimilars: Tripegfilgrastim and pegteograstim.

Authors:  Ka-Won Kang; Byung-Hyun Lee; Min Ji Jeon; Eun Sang Yu; Dae Sik Kim; Se Ryeon Lee; Hwa Jung Sung; Chul Won Choi; Yong Park; Byung Soo Kim
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 4.452

10.  Neglected respiratory toxicity caused by cancer therapy.

Authors:  Christian Domingo; Jorge Roig
Journal:  Open Respir Med J       Date:  2007-07-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.