Literature DB >> 22508381

The introduction of arrays in prenatal diagnosis: a special challenge.

Annalisa Vetro1, Katelijne Bouman, Ros Hastings, Dominic J McMullan, Joris R Vermeesch, Konstantin Miller, Birgit Sikkema-Raddatz, David H Ledbetter, Orsetta Zuffardi, Conny M A van Ravenswaaij-Arts.   

Abstract

Genome-wide arrays are rapidly replacing conventional karyotyping in postnatal cytogenetic diagnostics and there is a growing request for arrays in the prenatal setting. Several studies have documented 1-3% additional abnormal findings in prenatal diagnosis with arrays compared to conventional karyotyping. A recent meta-analysis demonstrated that 5.2% extra diagnoses can be expected in fetuses with ultrasound abnormalities. However, no consensus exists as to whether the use of genome-wide arrays should be restricted to pregnancies with ultrasound abnormalities, performed in all women undergoing invasive prenatal testing or offered to all pregnant women. Moreover, the interpretation of array results in the prenatal situation is challenging due to the large numbers of copy number variants with no major phenotypic effect. This also raises the question of what, or what not to report, for example, how to deal with unsolicited findings. These issues were discussed at a working group meeting that preceded the European Society of Human Genetics 2011 Conference in Amsterdam. This article is the result of this meeting and explores the introduction of genome-wide arrays into routine prenatal diagnosis. We aim to give some general recommendations on how to develop practical guidelines that can be implemented in the local setting and that are consistent with the emerging international consensus.
© 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22508381     DOI: 10.1002/humu.22050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mutat        ISSN: 1059-7794            Impact factor:   4.878


  20 in total

1.  Microarrays as a diagnostic tool in prenatal screening strategies: ethical reflection.

Authors:  Antina de Jong; Wybo J Dondorp; Merryn V E Macville; Christine E M de Die-Smulders; Jan M M van Lith; Guido M W R de Wert
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 2.  Array comparative genomic hybridization and genomic sequencing in the diagnostics of the causes of congenital anomalies.

Authors:  Krzysztof Szczałuba; Urszula Demkow
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Comparing genetic counselor's and patient's perceptions of needs in prenatal chromosomal microarray testing.

Authors:  Sarah A Walser; Katherine S Kellom; Steven C Palmer; Barbara A Bernhardt
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 4.  Recent advances in the prenatal interrogation of the human fetal genome.

Authors:  Lisa Hui; Diana W Bianchi
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 11.639

5.  Noninvasive detection of fetal subchromosome abnormalities via deep sequencing of maternal plasma.

Authors:  Anupama Srinivasan; Diana W Bianchi; Hui Huang; Amy J Sehnert; Richard P Rava
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Prenatal SNP array testing in 1000 fetuses with ultrasound anomalies: causative, unexpected and susceptibility CNVs.

Authors:  Malgorzata I Srebniak; Karin Em Diderich; Marieke Joosten; Lutgarde Cp Govaerts; Jeroen Knijnenburg; Femke At de Vries; Marjan Boter; Debora Lont; Maarten Fcm Knapen; Merel C de Wit; Attie Tji Go; Robert-Jan H Galjaard; Diane Van Opstal
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  Chromosomal microarray analysis as a first-line test in pregnancies with a priori low risk for the detection of submicroscopic chromosomal abnormalities.

Authors:  Francesco Fiorentino; Stefania Napoletano; Fiorina Caiazzo; Mariateresa Sessa; Sara Bono; Letizia Spizzichino; Anthony Gordon; Andrea Nuccitelli; Giuseppe Rizzo; Marina Baldi
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  Offering prenatal diagnostic tests: European guidelines for clinical practice [corrected].

Authors:  Heather Skirton; Lesley Goldsmith; Leigh Jackson; Celine Lewis; Lyn Chitty
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 9.  Implementation of high resolution whole genome array CGH in the prenatal clinical setting: advantages, challenges, and review of the literature.

Authors:  Paola Evangelidou; Angelos Alexandrou; Maria Moutafi; Marios Ioannides; Pavlos Antoniou; George Koumbaris; Ioannis Kallikas; Voula Velissariou; Carolina Sismani; Philippos C Patsalis
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 10.  Microarray Technology for the Diagnosis of Fetal Chromosomal Aberrations: Which Platform Should We Use?

Authors:  Evangelia Karampetsou; Deborah Morrogh; Lyn Chitty
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.