Literature DB >> 22508150

Non-invasive cardiac output monitoring in neonates using bioreactance: a comparison with echocardiography.

Dany E Weisz1, Amish Jain, Patrick J McNamara, Afif EL-Khuffash.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Non-invasive cardiac output monitoring is a potentially useful clinical tool in the neonatal setting. Our aim was to evaluate a new method of non-invasive continuous cardiac output (CO) measurement (NICOM™) based on the principle of bioreactance in neonates.
METHODS: In this prospective observational study, 10 neonates underwent 97 paired NICOM and echocardiography (echo) assessments of left ventricular output (LVO). For each neonate, NICOM measurements of left ventricular stroke volume (SV) and LVO over a 2- to 4-hour period were correlated with blinded, simultaneous, discrete echo measurements of SV and LVO. The precision and accuracy of the NICOM monitor relative to echo during periods of steady state were assessed.
RESULTS: The infants' median birth weight was 2.72 kg (IQR 1.56-3.23 kg, range 1.44-4.00) and their median gestation was 37 weeks (IQR 31-40 weeks, range 31-41). Median NICOM SV and LVO readings were consistently lower than echo (2.6 ml [IQR 1.4-3.2, range 0.6-5.3] vs. 3.5 ml [IQR 2.1-4.4, range 1.1-6.8], and 400 ml/min [IQR 233-476] vs. 559 ml/min [IQR 386-652], p < 0.001). The NICOM LVO readings were lower than the echo readings by a mean of 153 ± 56 ml/kg. NICOM consistently under-read LVO by 31 ± 8%, and this systematic difference was constant across the range of LVOs obtained. There was a strong correlation between NICOM and echo measurements of LVO (r = 0.95, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Non-invasive cardiac output monitoring is feasible in neonates. Further validation studies in neonatal animal experimental models and human neonates need to be conducted before routine clinical use.
Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22508150     DOI: 10.1159/000337295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neonatology        ISSN: 1661-7800            Impact factor:   4.035


  18 in total

Review 1.  Accuracy and precision of minimally-invasive cardiac output monitoring in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Koichi Suehiro; Alexandre Joosten; Linda Suk-Ling Murphy; Olivier Desebbe; Brenton Alexander; Sang-Hyun Kim; Maxime Cannesson
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Noninvasive continuous cardiac output and cerebral perfusion monitoring in term infants with neonatal encephalopathy: assessment of feasibility and reliability.

Authors:  Eva Forman; Colm R Breatnach; Stephanie Ryan; Jana Semberova; Jan Miletin; Adrienne Foran; Afif El-Khuffash
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 3.756

3.  Comparison of stroke volume measurement between non-invasive bioreactance and esophageal Doppler in patients undergoing major abdominal-pelvic surgery.

Authors:  Gennaro De Pascale; Mervyn Singer; David Brealey
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  The ability of stroke volume variation measured by a noninvasive cardiac output monitor to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated children.

Authors:  Ji Yeon Lee; Ji Young Kim; Chang Hyu Choi; Hong Soon Kim; Kyung Cheon Lee; Hyun Jeong Kwak
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 5.  Advances in monitoring and management of shock.

Authors:  Haifa Mtaweh; Erin V Trakas; Erik Su; Joseph A Carcillo; Rajesh K Aneja
Journal:  Pediatr Clin North Am       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 3.278

6.  Bioreactance-derived haemodynamic parameters in the transitional phase in preterm neonates: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Lizelle Van Wyk; Johan Smith; John Lawrenson; Carl J Lombard; Willem Pieter de Boode
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 1.977

7.  Bioreactance Is Not Interchangeable with Thermodilution for Measuring Cardiac Output during Adult Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Sangbin Han; Jong Hwan Lee; Gaabsoo Kim; Justin Sangwook Ko; Soo Joo Choi; Ji Hae Kwon; Burn Young Heo; Mi Sook Gwak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Comparison of monitoring performance of bioreactance versus esophageal Doppler in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Clément Dubost; Adrien Bouglé; Calliope Hallynck; Matthieu Le Dorze; Philippe Roulleau; Catherine Baujard; Dan Benhamou
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-01

Review 9.  Does stroke volume variation predict fluid responsiveness in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ling Yi; Zhongqiang Liu; Lina Qiao; Chaomin Wan; Dezhi Mu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Enhanced Monitoring of the Preterm Infant during Stabilization in the Delivery Room.

Authors:  Daragh Finn; Geraldine B Boylan; C Anthony Ryan; Eugene M Dempsey
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.418

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.