Literature DB >> 22507972

Endothelial-dependent vasomotion in a coronary segment treated by ABSORB everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold system is related to plaque composition at the time of bioresorption of the polymer: indirect finding of vascular reparative therapy?

Salvatore Brugaletta1, Jung Ho Heo, Hector M Garcia-Garcia, Vasim Farooq, Robert Jan van Geuns, Bernard de Bruyne, Dariusz Dudek, Pieter C Smits, Jacques Koolen, Dougal McClean, Cecile Dorange, Susan Veldhof, Richard Rapoza, Yoshinobu Onuma, Nico Bruining, John A Ormiston, Patrick W Serruys.   

Abstract

AIMS: To analyse the vasoreactivity of a coronary segment, previously scaffolded by the ABSORB bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) device, in relationship to its intravascular ultrasound-virtual histology (IVUS-VH) composition and reduction in greyscale echogenicity of the struts. Coronary segments, transiently scaffolded by a polymeric device, may in the long-term recover a normal vasomotor tone. Recovery of a normal endothelial-dependent vasomotion may be enabled by scaffold bioresorption, composition of the underlying tissue, or a combination of both mechanisms. METHODS AND
RESULTS: All patients from the ABSORB Cohort A and B trials, who underwent a vasomotion test and IVUS-VH investigation at 12 and 24 months, were included. Acetylcholine (Ach) and nitroglycerin were used to test either the endothelial-dependent or -independent vasomotion of the treated segment. Changes in polymeric strut echogenicity-a surrogate for bioresorption-IVUS-VH composition of the tissue underneath the scaffold and their relationship with the pharmacologically induced vasomotion were all evaluated. Overall, 26 patients underwent the vasomotion test (18 at 12 and 8 at 24 months). Vasodilatory response to Ach was quantitatively associated with larger reductions over time in polymeric strut echogenicity (y= -0.159x- 6.85; r= -0.781, P< 0.001). Scaffolded segments with vasoconstriction to Ach had larger vessel areas (14.37 ± 2.50 vs. 11.85 ± 2.54 mm(2), P= 0.030), larger plaque burden (57.31 ± 5.96 vs. 49.09 ± 9.10%, P= 0.018), and larger necrotic core (NC) areas [1.39 (+1.14, +1.74) vs. 0.78 mm(2) (+0.20, +0.98), P= 0.006] compared with those with vasodilation.
CONCLUSION: Vasodilatory response to Ach, in coronary segments scaffolded by the ABSORB BVS device, is associated with a reduction in echogenicity of the scaffold over time, and a low amount of NC. In particular, the latter finding resembles the behaviour of a native coronary artery not caged by an intracoronary device.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22507972     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr466

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  29 in total

Review 1.  Coronary physiology assessment in the catheterization laboratory.

Authors:  Felipe Díez-Delhoyo; Enrique Gutiérrez-Ibañes; Gerard Loughlin; Ricardo Sanz-Ruiz; María Eugenia Vázquez-Álvarez; Fernando Sarnago-Cebada; Rocío Angulo-Llanos; Ana Casado-Plasencia; Jaime Elízaga; Francisco Fernández Avilés Diáz
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2015-09-26

Review 2.  Endothelial dysfunction over the course of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Enrique Gutiérrez; Andreas J Flammer; Lilach O Lerman; Jaime Elízaga; Amir Lerman; Francisco Fernández-Avilés
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Chronic rapamycin restores brain vascular integrity and function through NO synthase activation and improves memory in symptomatic mice modeling Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Ai-Ling Lin; Wei Zheng; Jonathan J Halloran; Raquel R Burbank; Stacy A Hussong; Matthew J Hart; Martin Javors; Yen-Yu Ian Shih; Eric Muir; Rene Solano Fonseca; Randy Strong; Arlan G Richardson; James D Lechleiter; Peter T Fox; Veronica Galvan
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 4.  Emerging Technologies in Flow Diverters and Stents for Cerebrovascular Diseases.

Authors:  Michael Karsy; Jian Guan; Andrea A Brock; Anubhav Amin; Min S Park
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 5.  The effects of novel, bioresorbable scaffolds on coronary vascular pathophysiology.

Authors:  Michael J Lipinski; Ricardo O Escarcega; Thibault Lhermusier; Ron Waksman
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 6.  Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds - basic concepts and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Ciro Indolfi; Salvatore De Rosa; Antonio Colombo
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 7.  Methods to assess bioresorbable vascular scaffold devices behaviour after implantation.

Authors:  Alberto Pernigotti; Elisabetta Moscarella; Giosafat Spitaleri; Claudia Scardino; Kohki Ishida; Salvatore Brugaletta
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  A Tailorable In-Situ Light-Activated Biodegradable Vascular Scaffold.

Authors:  Mazen S Albaghdadi; Jian Yang; Jessica H Brown; Neel A Mansukhani; Guillermo A Ameer; Melina R Kibbe
Journal:  Adv Mater Technol       Date:  2017-02-20

9.  Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold in Real World Practice - A Single Center Experience.

Authors:  Huai-Wen Liang; Hsien-Li Kao; Yen-Hung Lin; Juey-Jen Hwang; Mao-Shin Lin; Fu-Tien Chiang; Chii-Ming Lee; Chih-Fan Yeh; Tzung-Dau Wang; Cho-Kai Wu; Lian-Yu Lin; Chia-Ti Tsai; Ying-Hsien Chen
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.672

Review 10.  Vascular mTOR-dependent mechanisms linking the control of aging to Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Veronica Galvan; Matthew J Hart
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2015-11-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.