Literature DB >> 22507530

Chondrogenesis of adipose stem cells in a porous polymer scaffold: influence of the pore size.

Gun-Ii Im1, Ji-Yun Ko, Jin Ho Lee.   

Abstract

This study examined how the difference in pore size of porous scaffolds affected the in vitro chondrogenic differentiation of seeded adipose stem cells (ASCs) and the in vivo cartilage repair of ASC/scaffold construct. ASCs were isolated from 18 rabbits and seeded in a porous poly (ε-caprolactone) (PCL) scaffold with different pore sizes (100, 200, 400 μm). The ASCs underwent in vitro chondrogenic induction under TGF-β2 and BMP-7 for 21 days before analysis. The ASC/scaffold construct was also implanted on the osteochondral defect created on the distal femur of the same rabbits, and the quality of cartilage regeneration was analyzed after 8 weeks. At day 21, the ASCs proliferated and spread on the surface of the scaffolds with a pore size 100 and 200 μm, whereas there were many lumps of conglomerated ASCs on those with a pore size of 400 μm. The DNA content was significantly lower in the scaffold with a pore size of 400 μm than in that with a pore size of 100 or 200 μm. Proteoglycan production was significantly greater in the scaffold with a pore size of 400 and 200 μm than in that with a pore size of 100 μm. The chondrogenic marker gene expression including SOX9 and COL2A1 was greatest in the scaffold with a pore size of 400 μm followed by 200 μm. Immunofluorescent imaging showed that, while SOX9 was localized to nucleus, type II collagen was observed on the cytoplasm and secreted matrix around the cells most abundantly in the scaffold with a pore size of 400 μm followed by 200 μm. The gross and histological findings from the osteochondral defects showed that the cartilage repair was better in the scaffold with a pore size of 400 and 200 μm than in that with a pore size of 100 μm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22507530     DOI: 10.3727/096368912X638865

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Transplant        ISSN: 0963-6897            Impact factor:   4.064


  16 in total

Review 1.  Functionality of decellularized matrix in cartilage regeneration: A comparison of tissue versus cell sources.

Authors:  Yu Sun; Lianqi Yan; Song Chen; Ming Pei
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 2.  Proper animal experimental designs for preclinical research of biomaterials for intervertebral disc regeneration.

Authors:  Yizhong Peng; Xiangcheng Qing; Hongyang Shu; Shuo Tian; Wenbo Yang; Songfeng Chen; Hui Lin; Xiao Lv; Lei Zhao; Xi Chen; Feifei Pu; Donghua Huang; Xu Cao; Zengwu Shao
Journal:  Biomater Transl       Date:  2021-06-28

3.  An immunomodulatory polypeptide hydrogel for osteochondral defect repair.

Authors:  Meng Yang; Zheng-Chu Zhang; Fu-Zhen Yuan; Rong-Hui Deng; Xin Yan; Feng-Biao Mao; You-Rong Chen; Hua Lu; Jia-Kuo Yu
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2022-05-13

4.  Increased adipogenesis of human adipose-derived stem cells on polycaprolactone fiber matrices.

Authors:  Cecilia Brännmark; Alexandra Paul; Diana Ribeiro; Björn Magnusson; Gabriella Brolén; Annika Enejder; Anna Forslöw
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Validation of the optimal scaffold pore size of nasal implants using the 3-dimensional culture technique.

Authors:  Jeoung Hyun Nam; So Yun Lee; Galina Khan; Eun Soo Park
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2020-07-15

Review 6.  Collagen Scaffolds in Cartilage Tissue Engineering and Relevant Approaches for Future Development.

Authors:  Vincent Irawan; Tzu-Cheng Sung; Akon Higuchi; Toshiyuki Ikoma
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 4.169

7.  In Vitro Characterization of Poly(Lactic Acid)/ Poly(Hydroxybutyrate)/ Thermoplastic Starch Blends for Tissue Engineering Application.

Authors:  Martina Culenova; Ivana Birova; Pavol Alexy; Paulina Galfyova; Andreas Nicodemou; Barbora Moncmanova; Roderik Plavec; Katarina Tomanova; Premysl Mencik; Stanislav Ziaran; Lubos Danisovic
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 4.064

8.  Osteochondral tissue engineering in vivo: a comparative study using layered silk fibroin scaffolds from mulberry and nonmulberry silkworms.

Authors:  Sushmita Saha; Banani Kundu; Jennifer Kirkham; David Wood; Subhas C Kundu; Xuebin B Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A Material Conferring Hemocompatibility.

Authors:  William Everett; David J Scurr; Anna Rammou; Arnold Darbyshire; George Hamilton; Achala de Mel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Regulation and Directing Stem Cell Fate by Tissue Engineering Functional Microenvironments: Scaffold Physical and Chemical Cues.

Authors:  Fei Xing; Lang Li; Changchun Zhou; Cheng Long; Lina Wu; Haoyuan Lei; Qingquan Kong; Yujiang Fan; Zhou Xiang; Xingdong Zhang
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 5.443

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.