Vincent Irawan1, Tzu-Cheng Sung2, Akon Higuchi2, Toshiyuki Ikoma1. 1. 1Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2 Chome-12-1, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, 152-8550 Japan. 2. 2Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, National Central University, No. 300 Jung Da Rd., Chung-Li, Taoyuan, 320 Taiwan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cartilage tissue engineering (CTE) aims to obtain a structure mimicking native cartilage tissue through the combination of relevant cells, three-dimensional scaffolds, and extraneous signals. Implantation of 'matured' constructs is thus expected to provide solution for treating large injury of articular cartilage. Type I collagen is widely used as scaffolds for CTE products undergoing clinical trial, owing to its ubiquitous biocompatibility and vast clinical approval. However, the long-term performance of pure type I collagen scaffolds would suffer from its limited chondrogenic capacity and inferior mechanical properties. This paper aims to provide insights necessary for advancing type I collagen scaffolds in the CTE applications. METHODS: Initially, the interactions of type I/II collagen with CTE-relevant cells [i.e., articular chondrocytes (ACs) and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs)] are discussed. Next, the physical features and chemical composition of the scaffolds crucial to support chondrogenic activities of AC and MSC are highlighted. Attempts to optimize the collagen scaffolds by blending with natural/synthetic polymers are described. Hybrid strategy in which collagen and structural polymers are combined in non-blending manner is detailed. RESULTS: Type I collagen is sufficient to support cellular activities of ACs and MSCs; however it shows limited chondrogenic performance than type II collagen. Nonetheless, type I collagen is the clinically feasible option since type II collagen shows arthritogenic potency. Physical features of scaffolds such as internal structure, pore size, stiffness, etc. are shown to be crucial in influencing the differentiation fate and secreting extracellular matrixes from ACs and MSCs. Collagen can be blended with native or synthetic polymer to improve the mechanical and bioactivities of final composites. However, the versatility of blending strategy is limited due to denaturation of type I collagen at harsh processing condition. Hybrid strategy is successful in maximizing bioactivity of collagen scaffolds and mechanical robustness of structural polymer. CONCLUSION: Considering the previous improvements of physical and compositional properties of collagen scaffolds and recent manufacturing developments of structural polymer, it is concluded that hybrid strategy is a promising approach to advance further collagen-based scaffolds in CTE.
BACKGROUND: Cartilage tissue engineering (CTE) aims to obtain a structure mimicking native cartilage tissue through the combination of relevant cells, three-dimensional scaffolds, and extraneous signals. Implantation of 'matured' constructs is thus expected to provide solution for treating large injury of articular cartilage. Type I collagen is widely used as scaffolds for CTE products undergoing clinical trial, owing to its ubiquitous biocompatibility and vast clinical approval. However, the long-term performance of pure type I collagen scaffolds would suffer from its limited chondrogenic capacity and inferior mechanical properties. This paper aims to provide insights necessary for advancing type I collagen scaffolds in the CTE applications. METHODS: Initially, the interactions of type I/II collagen with CTE-relevant cells [i.e., articular chondrocytes (ACs) and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs)] are discussed. Next, the physical features and chemical composition of the scaffolds crucial to support chondrogenic activities of AC and MSC are highlighted. Attempts to optimize the collagen scaffolds by blending with natural/synthetic polymers are described. Hybrid strategy in which collagen and structural polymers are combined in non-blending manner is detailed. RESULTS: Type I collagen is sufficient to support cellular activities of ACs and MSCs; however it shows limited chondrogenic performance than type II collagen. Nonetheless, type I collagen is the clinically feasible option since type II collagen shows arthritogenic potency. Physical features of scaffolds such as internal structure, pore size, stiffness, etc. are shown to be crucial in influencing the differentiation fate and secreting extracellular matrixes from ACs and MSCs. Collagen can be blended with native or synthetic polymer to improve the mechanical and bioactivities of final composites. However, the versatility of blending strategy is limited due to denaturation of type I collagen at harsh processing condition. Hybrid strategy is successful in maximizing bioactivity of collagen scaffolds and mechanical robustness of structural polymer. CONCLUSION: Considering the previous improvements of physical and compositional properties of collagen scaffolds and recent manufacturing developments of structural polymer, it is concluded that hybrid strategy is a promising approach to advance further collagen-based scaffolds in CTE.
Entities:
Keywords:
Articular chondrocytes; Cartilage tissue engineering; Hybrid scaffolds; Mesenchymal stem cells; Type I collagen
Authors: M Tulla; O T Pentikäinen; T Viitasalo; J Käpylä; U Impola; P Nykvist; L Nissinen; M S Johnson; J Heino Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2001-09-25 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: J Pieper; P Buma; T H van Kuppevelt; H van Beuningen; P M van Der Kraan; J H Veerkamp; W B van den Berg Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Soon Hee Kim; Heesun Hong; Olatunji Ajiteru; Md Tipu Sultan; Young Jin Lee; Ji Seung Lee; Ok Joo Lee; Hanna Lee; Hae Sang Park; Kyu Young Choi; Joong Seob Lee; Hyung Woo Ju; In-Sun Hong; Chan Hum Park Journal: Nat Protoc Date: 2021-10-29 Impact factor: 13.491
Authors: Qinghua Xu; Jessica E Torres; Mazin Hakim; Paulina M Babiak; Pallabi Pal; Carly M Battistoni; Michael Nguyen; Alyssa Panitch; Luis Solorio; Julie C Liu Journal: Mater Sci Eng R Rep Date: 2021-07-30 Impact factor: 33.667
Authors: Alex Avendano; Jonathan J Chang; Marcos G Cortes-Medina; Aaron J Seibel; Bitania R Admasu; Cassandra M Boutelle; Andrew R Bushman; Ayush Arpit Garg; Cameron M DeShetler; Sara L Cole; Jonathan W Song Journal: ACS Biomater Sci Eng Date: 2020-02-05
Authors: Molly Klimak; Robert J Nims; Lara Pferdehirt; Kelsey H Collins; Natalia S Harasymowicz; Sara J Oswald; Lori A Setton; Farshid Guilak Journal: Acta Biomater Date: 2021-04-03 Impact factor: 8.947