Literature DB >> 22505243

Comparison of a digital and an optical analogue hand-held refractometer for the measurement of canine urine specific gravity.

J K Paris1, A D Bennett, S J Dodkin, D A Gunn-Moore.   

Abstract

Urine specific gravity (USG) is used clinically as a measure of urine concentration, and is routinely assessed by refractometry. A comparison between optical analogue and digital refractometers for evaluation of canine urine has not been reported. The aim of this study was to compare a digital and an optical analogue hand-held refractometer for the measurement of canine USG, and to assess correlation with urine osmolality. Prospective study. Free-catch urine samples were collected from 285 hospitalised adult dogs, and paired USG readings were obtained with a digital and an optical analogue refractometer. In 50 dogs, urine osmolality was also measured using a freezing point depression osmometer. There was a small but statistically significant difference between the two refractometers (P<0.001), with the optical analogue refractometer reading higher than the digital refractometer (mean difference 0.0006, sd 0.0012). Paired refractometer measurements varied by <0.002 in 91.5 per cent of cases. The optical analogue and digital refractometer readings showed excellent correlation with osmolality (r=0.980 and r=0.977, respectively, P<0.001 in both cases). Despite statistical significance, the difference between the two refractometers is unlikely to be clinically significant. Both instruments provide an accurate assessment of USG in dogs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22505243     DOI: 10.1136/vr.100348

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Rec        ISSN: 0042-4900            Impact factor:   2.695


  6 in total

1.  Influence of preanalytic and analytic variables in canine and feline urine specific gravity measurement by refractometer.

Authors:  Martina Mösch; Sven Reese; Karin Weber; Katrin Hartmann; Roswitha Dorsch
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 1.279

2.  Agreement of urine specific gravity measurements between manual and digital refractometers.

Authors:  Dawn M Minton; Eric Kyle O'Neal; Toni Marie Torres-McGehee
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Reliability of Three Urine Specific Gravity Meters Measuring Brix and Urine Solutions at Different Temperatures.

Authors:  Floris Wardenaar; Carmen P Ortega-Santos; Kaila Vento; Stephanie Olzinski; Jason Olig; Stavros Kavouras; Carol Johnston
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Interobserver reliability of canine urine specific gravity assessed by analog or digital refractometers.

Authors:  John C Rowe; Jessica A Hokamp; Jessica N Braatz; John R Freitag-Engstrom; Nicole L Stephens; Dennis J Chew; Catherine Langston; Adam J Rudinsky
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 1.279

5.  Evaluation and analytical validation of a handheld digital refractometer for urine specific gravity measurement.

Authors:  Sara P Wyness; Joshua J H Hunsaker; Taylor M Snow; Jonathan R Genzen
Journal:  Pract Lab Med       Date:  2016-06-02

6.  Clinical performance evaluation of total protein measurement by digital refractometry and characterization of non-protein solute interferences.

Authors:  Joshua J H Hunsaker; Sara P Wyness; Taylor M Snow; Jonathan R Genzen
Journal:  Pract Lab Med       Date:  2016-08-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.