Literature DB >> 25280126

Agreement of urine specific gravity measurements between manual and digital refractometers.

Dawn M Minton1, Eric Kyle O'Neal, Toni Marie Torres-McGehee.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Urine specific gravity (Usg), measured by a handheld manual refractometer (MAN), has been recognized as a valid and practical means of assessing hydration status. Newer, digital refractometers are faster and more user friendly but have not been validated against the traditional MAN.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the reliability and validity of 2 digital refractometer models and a MAN.
DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study.
SETTING: Research laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Sample of convenience was recruited from the local university and surrounding community (n = 82). INTERVENTION(S): Participants provided multiple urine samples (n = 124) over a 5-month period under various hydration conditions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Urine specific gravity was compared among a MAN, a digital refractometer requiring the prism to be dipped (DIP) into a urine sample, and a digital refractometer that requires urine to be pipetted (PIP) onto its prism for analysis.
RESULTS: The MAN measurements were strongly correlated with the DIP (r = 0.99, P < .001) and PIP (r = 0.97, P < .001) measurements. Bland-Altman analyses revealed slight mean underestimation (95% upper and lower levels of agreement) between MAN and DIP (-0.0012 [0.0028] and PIP -0.0011 [0.0035], respectively) and trends toward increased underestimation at higher Usg. Measurement error ≥ .005 was greater for PIP (4/124, 3.2%) than for DIP (2/124, 1.6%).
CONCLUSIONS: Negligible differences were exhibited between PIP and DIP, with both displaying acceptable reliability and validity compared with the MAN. However, the Bland-Altman analysis suggests underestimation bias for the DIP and PIP as Usg increases, with the potential for rare but substantial underestimation when using PIP that should be recognized by clinicians, particularly when used as a screening measure in weight-class sports.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hydration assessment; reliability; validity; weight-class sports

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25280126      PMCID: PMC4299737          DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.47

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  24 in total

1.  Blood and urinary measures of hydration status during progressive acute dehydration.

Authors:  L A Popowski; R A Oppliger; G Patrick Lambert; R F Johnson; A Kim Johnson; C V Gisolf
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 2.  Hydration testing of athletes.

Authors:  Robert A Oppliger; Cynthia Bartok
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  [Comparative measurement of urine specific gravity: reagent strips, refractometry and hydrometry].

Authors:  Christian Elías Costa; Carolina Bettendorff; Sol Bupo; Sandra Ayuso; Graciela Vallejo
Journal:  Arch Argent Pediatr       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Human hydration indices: acute and longitudinal reference values.

Authors:  Lawrence E Armstrong; Amy C Pumerantz; Kelly A Fiala; Melissa W Roti; Stavros A Kavouras; Douglas J Casa; Carl M Maresh
Journal:  Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 5.  Assessing hydration status: the elusive gold standard.

Authors:  Lawrence E Armstrong
Journal:  J Am Coll Nutr       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Urinary indices during dehydration, exercise, and rehydration.

Authors:  L E Armstrong; J A Soto; F T Hacker; D J Casa; S A Kavouras; C M Maresh
Journal:  Int J Sport Nutr       Date:  1998-12

7.  Hypohydration effects on skeletal muscle performance and metabolism: a 31P-MRS study.

Authors:  S J Montain; S A Smith; R P Mattot; G P Zientara; F A Jolesz; M N Sawka
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1998-06

8.  Accuracy of urine specific gravity and osmolality as indicators of hydration status.

Authors:  Robert A Oppliger; Scott A Magnes; LeRoy A Popowski; Carl V Gisolfi
Journal:  Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.599

9.  Urinary indices of hydration status.

Authors:  L E Armstrong; C M Maresh; J W Castellani; M F Bergeron; R W Kenefick; K E LaGasse; D Riebe
Journal:  Int J Sport Nutr       Date:  1994-09

10.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  4 in total

1.  Automated Urinal-Based Specific Gravity Measurement Device for Real-Time Hydration Monitoring in Male Athletes.

Authors:  Brian F Bender; Nick J Johnson; Jasmine A Berry; Kelvin M Frazier; Michael B Bender
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-06-16

2.  Reliability of Three Urine Specific Gravity Meters Measuring Brix and Urine Solutions at Different Temperatures.

Authors:  Floris Wardenaar; Carmen P Ortega-Santos; Kaila Vento; Stephanie Olzinski; Jason Olig; Stavros Kavouras; Carol Johnston
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Evaluation and analytical validation of a handheld digital refractometer for urine specific gravity measurement.

Authors:  Sara P Wyness; Joshua J H Hunsaker; Taylor M Snow; Jonathan R Genzen
Journal:  Pract Lab Med       Date:  2016-06-02

4.  The Heat Is On: Effects of Synchronous Music on Psychophysiological Parameters and Running Performance in Hot and Humid Conditions.

Authors:  Luke Nikol; Garry Kuan; Marilyn Ong; Yu-Kai Chang; Peter C Terry
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-07-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.