Literature DB >> 22503322

Surgical resident participation in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y bypass: Is it safe?

Medhat Fanous1, Arthur Carlin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The majority of bariatric surgeons use dedicated surgical assistants when performing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LGBP) because of the technical difficulty and steep learning curve involved in the operation. At our institution, either a senior surgical resident (SSR) or a physician assistant (PA) participates in LGBP cases. The PA's role is confined to assisting, whereas the SSR progressively acts as the operating surgeon. We were interested in evaluating patient outcomes to determine whether any differences existed between the LGBP operations in which either the PA or the SSR participated.
METHODS: All patients undergoing LGBP between January 2007 and December 2009 in our prospectively collected bariatric database were reviewed. Demographics, baseline measures, intraoperative parameters, and outcomes were compared.
RESULTS: A total of 711 patients were identified. The group involving PAs included 343 patients, and the group involving SSRs included 368 patients. Preoperative comorbidities, including diabetes, hypertension, coronary artery disease, asthma, sleep apnea, hyperlipidemia, musculoskeletal disability, and depression, were similar in both groups. Personal histories of venous thromboembolism were higher in the PA group (5.1% vs 2.5%; P = .075). The mean body-mass indexes (BMI) (53 ± 9 vs 51 ± 8 kg/m(2); P = .006) and weights (323 ± 67 vs 306 ± 59 lbs; P < .001) in the PA group were significantly higher than in the SSR group. The proportion of males was higher in the PA group (24% vs 16%; P = .008). The operative time was significantly shorter in the PA group (121 ± 36 vs 164 ± 30 minutes; P < .001). There was no significant difference between the groups in intraoperative complications, length of hospital stay, 30-day complications, or reoperations within 1 year. There were no mortalities in either group. The 1-year percent excess weight loss (64% vs 66%) was similar in the PA and SSR groups, respectively.
CONCLUSION: SSR participation in LGBP prolongs operative time but does not increase complications, mortality rates, or length of stay. Therefore, SSR participation in LGBP is safe and produces outcomes comparable to those performed with PAs.
Copyright © 2012 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22503322     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.02.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  11 in total

1.  Resident participation in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a comparison of outcomes from the ACS-NSQIP database.

Authors:  Laura Doyon; Alejandro Moreno-Koehler; Rocco Ricciardi; Dmitry Nepomnayshy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Impact of Fellow Versus Resident Assistance on Outcomes Following Pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Rosalie A Carr; Catherine W Chung; Christian M Schmidt; Andrea Jester; Molly E Kilbane; Michael G House; Nicholas J Zyromski; Attila Nakeeb; C Max Schmidt; Eugene P Ceppa
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Surgical trainee impact on bariatric surgery safety.

Authors:  Iliya Goldberg; Jie Yang; Jihye Park; Aurora D Pryor; Salvatore Docimo; Andrew T Bates; Mark A Talamini; Konstantinos Spaniolas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Can a laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass be safely performed by surgical residents in a bariatric center-of-excellence? The learning curve of surgical residents in bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Anne-Sophie van Rijswijk; Daan E Moes; Noëlle Geubbels; Barbara A Hutten; Yair I Z Acherman; Arnold W van de Laar; Maurits de Brauw; Sjoerd C Bruin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Effects of resident involvement on complication rates after laparoscopic gastric bypass.

Authors:  Robert W Krell; Nancy J O Birkmeyer; Bradley N Reames; Arthur M Carlin; John D Birkmeyer; Jonathan F Finks
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: assistant's seniority has no influence on perioperative course.

Authors:  Yasmin Abu-Ghanem; Tomer Erlich; Jacob Ramon; Zohar Dotan; Dorit E Zilberman
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-11-09

7.  The effect of hospital teaching status on outcomes in bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Colette S Inaba; Christina Y Koh; Sarath Sujatha-Bhaskar; Yoon Lee; Marija Pejcinovska; Ninh T Nguyen
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.734

8.  Education in thyroid surgery: a matched-pair analysis comparing residents and board-certified surgeons.

Authors:  Alexander Reinisch; Patrizia Malkomes; Juliane Liese; Teresa Schreckenbach; Katharina Holzer; Wolf Otto Bechstein; Nils Habbe
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  A Challenge between Trainee Education and Patient Safety: Does Fellow Participation Impact Postoperative Outcomes Following Bariatric Surgery?

Authors:  Ali Aminian; Rizwan M Chaudhry; Zhamak Khorgami; Amin Andalib; Toms Augustin; John Rodriguez; Matthew Kroh; Philip R Schauer; Stacy A Brethauer
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  Complications and Readmissions Associated with First Assistant Training Level Following Elective Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Tarik K Yuce; Amy Holmstrom; Nathaniel J Soper; Alexander P Nagle; Eric S Hungness; Ryan P Merkow; Ezra N Teitelbaum
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 3.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.