INTRODUCTION: Rodent whisking behavior is supported by the buccal and mandibular branches of the facial nerve, but a description of how these branches converge and contribute to whisker movement is lacking. METHODS: Eight rats underwent isolated transection of either the buccal or mandibular branch and subsequent opposite branch transection. Whisking function was analyzed after both transections. Anatomical measurements, and video recording of stimulation to individual branches, were taken from both facial nerves in 10 rats. RESULTS: Normal to near-normal whisking was demonstrated after isolated branch transection. Whisking was eliminated after transection of both branches. The buccal and mandibular branches form a convergence just proximal to the whisker pad, herein called "distal pes." Distal to this convergence, we identified consistent anatomy that demonstrated cross-innervation. CONCLUSION: The overlap of efferent supply to the whisker pad must be considered when studying facial nerve regeneration in the rat facial nerve model.
INTRODUCTION: Rodent whisking behavior is supported by the buccal and mandibular branches of the facial nerve, but a description of how these branches converge and contribute to whisker movement is lacking. METHODS: Eight rats underwent isolated transection of either the buccal or mandibular branch and subsequent opposite branch transection. Whisking function was analyzed after both transections. Anatomical measurements, and video recording of stimulation to individual branches, were taken from both facial nerves in 10 rats. RESULTS: Normal to near-normal whisking was demonstrated after isolated branch transection. Whisking was eliminated after transection of both branches. The buccal and mandibular branches form a convergence just proximal to the whisker pad, herein called "distal pes." Distal to this convergence, we identified consistent anatomy that demonstrated cross-innervation. CONCLUSION: The overlap of efferent supply to the whisker pad must be considered when studying facial nerve regeneration in the rat facial nerve model.
Authors: James T Heaton; Jeffrey M Kowaleski; Roberto Bermejo; H Philip Zeigler; David J Ahlgren; Tessa A Hadlock Journal: J Neurosci Methods Date: 2008-03-22 Impact factor: 2.390
Authors: Jacqueline J Greene; Mark T McClendon; Nicholas Stephanopoulos; Zaida Álvarez; Samuel I Stupp; Claus-Peter Richter Journal: J Tissue Eng Regen Med Date: 2018-05-16 Impact factor: 3.963
Authors: Julie S Weinberg; Ingrid J Kleiss; Christopher J Knox; James T Heaton; Tessa A Hadlock Journal: Ann Plast Surg Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 1.539
Authors: James T Heaton; Shu Hsien Sheu; Marc H Hohman; Christopher J Knox; Julie S Weinberg; Ingrid J Kleiss; Tessa A Hadlock Journal: Neuroscience Date: 2014-01-28 Impact factor: 3.590
Authors: James T Heaton; Christopher J Knox; Juan S Malo; James B Kobler; Tessa A Hadlock Journal: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng Date: 2013-03-07 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: Marc H Hohman; Ingrid J Kleiss; Christopher J Knox; Julie S Weinberg; James T Heaton; Tessa A Hadlock Journal: JAMA Facial Plast Surg Date: 2014 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 4.611
Authors: Min Jae Kim; Yoo Yeon Kim; Janet Ren Chao; Hae Sang Park; Jiwon Chang; Dawoon Oh; Jae Jun Lee; Tae Chun Kang; Jun-Gyo Suh; Jun Ho Lee Journal: In Vivo Date: 2017 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.155