Literature DB >> 22498021

Acceptability of narratives to promote colorectal cancer screening in an online community.

Kevin O Hwang1, Amber W Trickey, Amanda L Graham, Eric J Thomas, Richard L Street, Jennifer L Kraschnewski, Sally W Vernon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the acceptability of narratives to promote colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among members of an online weight loss community.
METHOD: Members of online weight loss community completed an Internet survey in 2010. Multiple logistic regression models examined demographic and attitudinal correlates of interest in sharing and receiving CRC screening narratives.
RESULTS: Participants (n=2386) were 92% female with mean (SD) age 58 (6) years; 68% were up-to-date with CRC screening. Among those who were up-to-date, 39% were interested in sharing their narratives with other members. African-Americans were more likely than other racial groups to be interested in sharing narratives (adjusted OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.14-3.57). Older, married members and those with greater CRC screening worries were less likely to be interested in sharing narratives. Among those not up-to-date, 63% were interested in receiving narratives from online community members, and those with higher perceived salience of CRC screening were more likely to be interested in receiving narratives (adjusted OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.31-2.65).
CONCLUSIONS: Members of this online weight loss community expressed interest in sharing and receiving narratives for CRC screening promotion. Attitudes and demographic characteristics may predict successful recruitment of those who would share and receive narratives.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22498021      PMCID: PMC4154343          DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.03.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  12 in total

Review 1.  Narrative communication in cancer prevention and control: a framework to guide research and application.

Authors:  Matthew W Kreuter; Melanie C Green; Joseph N Cappella; Michael D Slater; Meg E Wise; Doug Storey; Eddie M Clark; Daniel J O'Keefe; Deborah O Erwin; Kathleen Holmes; Leslie J Hinyard; Thomas Houston; Sabra Woolley
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2007-06

2.  Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-10-06       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Overweight, obesity, and mortality from cancer in a prospectively studied cohort of U.S. adults.

Authors:  Eugenia E Calle; Carmen Rodriguez; Kimberly Walker-Thurmond; Michael J Thun
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-04-24       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Development and validation of an instrument to measure factors related to colorectal cancer screening adherence.

Authors:  S W Vernon; R E Myers; B C Tilley
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Reliability and validity of a questionnaire to measure colorectal cancer screening behaviors: does mode of survey administration matter?

Authors:  Sally W Vernon; Jasmin A Tiro; Rachel W Vojvodic; Sharon Coan; Pamela M Diamond; Anthony Greisinger; Maria E Fernandez
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Obesity and colon and rectal cancer risk: a meta-analysis of prospective studies.

Authors:  Susanna C Larsson; Alicja Wolk
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 7.045

7.  Race moderates the relationship between obesity and colorectal cancer screening in women.

Authors:  Lucia A Leone; Marci K Campbell; Jessie A Satia; J Michael Bowling; Michael P Pignone
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 2.506

8.  Colorectal cancer screening disparities related to obesity and gender.

Authors:  Allison B Rosen; Eric C Schneider
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Body mass and colorectal cancer risk in the NIH-AARP cohort.

Authors:  Kenneth F Adams; Michael F Leitzmann; Demetrius Albanes; Victor Kipnis; Traci Mouw; Al Hollenbeck; Arthur Schatzkin
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-04-21       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  The role of online support communities: benefits of expanded social networks to patients with psoriasis.

Authors:  Shereene Z Idriss; Joseph C Kvedar; Alice J Watson
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  2009-01
View more
  7 in total

1.  Feasibility of utilising an all-volunteer workforce as a disruptive innovation for the US obesity epidemic.

Authors:  Jennifer L Kraschnewski; Kevin O Hwang; Daniel R George; Erik B Lehman; Christopher N Sciamanna
Journal:  Obes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 2.288

Review 2.  Use and taxonomy of social media in cancer-related research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alexis Koskan; Lynne Klasko; Stacy N Davis; Clement K Gwede; Kristen J Wells; Ambuj Kumar; Natalia Lopez; Cathy D Meade
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Assessing emotions conveyed and elicited by patient narratives and their impact on intention to participate in colorectal cancer screening: A psychophysiological investigation.

Authors:  Teresa Gavaruzzi; Michela Sarlo; Francesca Giandomenico; Rino Rumiati; Francesca Polato; Franca De Lazzari; Lorella Lotto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  How narratives influence colorectal cancer screening decision making and uptake: A realist review.

Authors:  Anke Judith Woudstra; Jeanine Suurmond
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Adult Willingness to Use Email and Social Media for Peer-to-Peer Cancer Screening Communication: Quantitative Interview Study.

Authors:  Sarah L Cutrona; Douglas W Roblin; Joann L Wagner; Bridget Gaglio; Andrew E Williams; Rosalie Torres Stone; Terry S Field; Kathleen M Mazor
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2013-11-28

6.  Supplementing factual information with patient narratives in the cancer screening context: a qualitative study of acceptability and preferences.

Authors:  Kirsty F Bennett; Christian von Wagner; Kathryn A Robb
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Toward Predicting Social Support Needs in Online Health Social Networks.

Authors:  Min-Je Choi; Sung-Hee Kim; Sukwon Lee; Bum Chul Kwon; Ji Soo Yi; Jaegul Choo; Jina Huh
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 5.428

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.