| Literature DB >> 22496932 |
Deqing Wang1, Yuan Zhuang, Yaping Tian, Graham Neil Thomas, Mingzhong Ying, Brian Tomlinson.
Abstract
Astragalus mongholicus Bunge has long been used to treat cardiovascular disease in Chinese traditional medicine. However, its mechanisms are not fully understood. In this study, we explored potential mechanisms and protective effects of total flavonoids of Astragalus (TFA) on cardiovascular disease using in vitro experiments and diet-induced atherosclerotic rabbits. We identified six components and their proportion in TFA. The animal experiments showed that TFA significantly reduced plasma levels of total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol (P < 0.05 to 0.01), increased HDL cholesterol levels (P < 0.01), and reduced the aortic fatty streak area by 43.6 to 63.6% (P < 0.01). We also found that TFA scavenged superoxide and hydroxyl radicals and this effect increased with higher TFA concentration. In in vivo experiments, TFA effectively inhibited the free radical spectrum in the ischemia-reperfusion module. In conclusion, TFA was the active component of Astragalus mongholicus Bunge, which benefits cardiovascular disease attributing to the potent antioxidant activity to improve the atherosclerosis profile.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22496932 PMCID: PMC3306992 DOI: 10.1155/2012/282383
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev ISSN: 1942-0994 Impact factor: 6.543
Figure 1The six chemical constituents of TFA.
Effect of TFA and combination vitamins on lipid profiles in cholesterol-fed rabbits (mmol/L).
| Groups | Week 0 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TC | HDL-C | LDL-C | TG | |
| A | 0.83 ± 0.34 | 0.46 ± 0.26 | 0.22 ± 0.15 | 0.69 ± 0.15 |
| B | 0.77 ± 0.35 | 0.55 ± 0.23 | 0.30 ± 0.23 | 0.71 ± 0.23 |
| C | 0.81 ± 0.27 | 0.53 ± 0.27 | 0.27 ± 0.16 | 0.53 ± 0.12 |
| D | 0.88 ± 0.35 | 0.49 ± 0.19 | 0.29 ± 0.23 | 0.63 ± 0.19 |
| E | 0.80 ± 0.23 | 0.48 ± 0.16 | 0.22 ± 0.12 | 0.43 ± 0.19 |
| Groups | Week 4 | |||
| TC | HDL-C | LDL-C | TG | |
| A | 0.82 ± 0.37 | 0.35 ± 0.11 | 0.18 ± 0.11 | 0.49 ± 0.15 |
| B | 34.36 ± 12.94 | 0.76 ± 0.39▲ | 30.91 ± 9.53 | 1.20 ± 0.62 |
| C | 15.06 ± 11.50▾‡ | 0.81 ± 0.35Δ | 14.48 ± 10.73Δ‡ | 0.79 ± 0.35 |
| D | 23.96 ± 9.61 | 0.67 ± 0.19 | 21.97 ± 9.06 | 0.86 ± 0.47 |
| E | 12.73 ± 4.96▾‡ | 0.55 ± 0.12 | 12.85 ± 5.15▲‡ | 0.89 ± 0.27 |
| Groups | Week 8 | |||
| TC | HDL-C | LDL-C | TG | |
| A | 0.76 ± 0.34 | 0.42 ± 0.23 | 0.22 ± 0.11 | 0.53 ± 0.19 |
| B | 36.55 ± 18.86 | 0.71 ± 0.39 | 43.14 ± 17.08 | 1.52 ± 0.97▲ |
| C | 26.04 ± 17.39 | 1.34 ± 1.20 | 27.47 ± 21.11 | 1.25 ± 0.47▲ |
| D | 29.55 ± 14.49 | 0.72 ± 0.23 | 27.18 ± 13.87 | 1.05 ± 0.39▲ |
| E | 22.16 ± 13.52 | 0.90 ± 0.43 | 21.54 ± 9.33▾∗ | 1.36 ± 0.78▲ |
| Groups | Week 12 | |||
| TC | HDL-C | LDL-C | TG | |
| A | 0.81 ± 0.34 | 0.40 ± 0.11 | 0.24 ± 0.15 | 0.52 ± 0.34 |
| B | 57.14 ± 14.18 | 0.86 ± 0.31 | 46.02 ± 23.55 | 2.39 ± 2.09Δ |
| C | 31.55 ± 15.88▾† | 1.77 ± 0.62 | 35.30 ± 18.28 | 1.77 ± 0.81▲∗ |
| D | 37.57 ± 16.96▾∗ | 1.37 ± 1.36 | 35.70 ± 17.31 | 2.21 ± 1.12▲ |
| E | 37.92 ± 19.25▾∗ | 2.35 ± 1.36∆† | 37.14 ± 18.55 | 2.08 ± 0.97▲ |
Group A (n = 14) received normal chow; group B (n = 15) high-cholesterol diet; group C (n = 15) high-cholesterol diet plus vitamin E + C; group D and E (n = 15 each) high-cholesterol diet plus TFA (60 or 120 mg/day, resp.). Data expressed as mean ± SD. P < 0.01, P < 0.001 compared with group A. *P < 0.05, †P < 0.05, ‡P < 0.01 compared with group B.
Effect of TFA and combination vitamins on fatty streak area of the aorta, total cholesterol content in the aortic arch, and ratio of intima to media average thickness in cholesterol-fed rabbits.
| Group | Fatty streak area (%) | Total cholesterol (mg) | Ratio of intima/media thickness |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 1.65 ± 1.31 | 1.12 ± 0.30 | — |
| B | 37.50 ± 20.45▲ | 25.06 ± 20.60▲ | 0.66 ± 0.31 |
| C | 24.70 ± 6.27▲∗ | 12.04 ± 8.83Δ∗ | 0.39 ± 0.16* |
| D | 26.12 ± 12.20▲ | 14.27 ± 7.75Δ | 0.36 ± 0.23‡ |
| E | 22.92 ± 7.51▲† | 11.67 ± 6.16Δ∗ | 0.32 ± 0.12‡ |
Data expressed as mean ± SD. ΔP < 0.01, ▲P < 0.001 compared with group A; *P < 0.05, †P < 0.01, ‡P < 0.001 compared with group B.
Figure 2Microscopic sections of aortas with hematoxylin eosin staining. (a), (c), and (e) show the entire aorta, part of aorta with original magnification 100x and 400x of normal chow group. (b), (d), and (f) show the aorta changed in the high-cholesterol-fed group with the entire aorta, part of aorta with original magnification 100x and 400x, respectively.
Effect of different treatments on FRAP activity in cholesterol-fed rabbits (μmoL/L).
| Group | Week 0 | Week 4 | Week 8 | Week 12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 297 ± 200 | 332 ± 135 | 229 ± 71 | 264 ± 161 |
| B | 280 ± 108 | 516 ± 364 | 517 ± 198 | 775 ± 430 |
| C | 317 ± 70 | 1117 ± 840▴ | 1831 ± 852▴‡ | 1887 ± 813▴† |
| D | 258 ± 101 | 380 ± 151 | 443 ± 132 | 640 ± 403 |
| E | 326 ± 112 | 385 ± 93 | 396 ± 147 | 1013 ± 856Δ |
Data expressed as mean ± SD. P < 0.05, ΔP < 0.01, ▴P < 0.001 compared with group A; †P < 0.01, ‡P < 0.001 compared with group B.
Effect of TFA and vitamins on plasma α-tocopherol levels in cholesterol-fed rabbits (μmol/L).
| Group | Week 0 | Week 4 | Week 8 | Week 12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 2.69 ± 2.92 | 2.00 ± 2.10 | 2.05 ± 1.83 | 2.49 ± 3.41 |
| B | 2.08 ± 1.47 | 24.33 ± 27.96Δ | 10.32 ± 8.60 | 19.74 ± 20.29 |
| C | 2.04 ± 1.20 | 98.00 ± 71.57▴ | 100.40 ± 65.18▴† | 175.00 ± 83.39▴† |
| D | 2.67 ± 3.21 | 22.05 ± 13.40 Δ | 18.88 ± 20.06 Δ | 32.59 ± 31.52Δ |
| E | 2.00 ± 3.87 | 15.93 ± 12.28 | 16.62 ± 16.96 Δ | 18.11 ± 17.16Δ |
Data expressed as mean ± SD.P < 0.05, ΔP < 0.01, ▴P < 0.001 compared with group A; †P < 0.01 compared with group B.
Figure 3Scavenging effect of TFA on superoxide radical; (a) control; (b) 1.2 g/L TFA; (c) 0.12 g/L TFA.
Figure 4Scavenging effect of TFA on hydroxyl radical; (a) control; (b) 1.2 g/L TFA; (c) 0.12 g/L TFA.
Free radical-PBN adduct (U/g wt).
| Group | Baseline | Reperfusion for 1′ | Reperfusion for 5′ | Reperfusion for 10′ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 0 | 8.92 ± 1.32 | 12.62 ± 2.28 | 8.42 ± 0.99 |
| TFA | 0 | 4.83 ± 0.67* | 3.56 ± 0.74* | 5.25 ± 0.51* |
n = 8, *P < 0.05, compared with control.