Literature DB >> 22496708

Stentless pediatric robotic pyeloplasty.

Alejandro R Rodriguez, Mark A Rich, Hubert S Swana.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Open dismembered pyeloplasty remains the standard of care for the correction of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children. We describe our experience with a tubeless, stentless pediatric robotic pyeloplasty technique.
METHODS: Between October 2008 and September 2009, 12 consecutive children underwent robotic dismembered pyeloplasty. Ureteral stents or nephrostomy tubes were not used. Operative time, hospital stay, days of Jackson-Pratt drainage, and complications were analyzed. Postoperative renal ultrasonography was obtained at 4-6 weeks after surgery.
RESULTS: The mean patient age was 9.1 years (3.5-16). The mean operative and console times were 178 (122-250) and 129 (96-193) minutes, respectively. The Jackson-Pratt drain was removed after a mean of 1.8 days (1-4). The mean hospital stay was 2.4 days (1-4.5). There were no complications. Mean follow up was 16 months (12-24 months). All patients had complete resolution of symptoms. Hydronephrosis either completely resolved or significantly decreased in all cases. In cases without complete resolution of hydronephrosis, 99m Tc-MAG-3 diuretic renography showed preservation of renal function without obstruction.
CONCLUSIONS: Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty can be safely performed without internal indwelling stent drainage. In children, this avoids the need for additional anesthesia and stent-related morbidity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  laparoscopy; pediatric; pyeloplasty; robotics

Year:  2012        PMID: 22496708      PMCID: PMC3317541          DOI: 10.1177/1756287211434927

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Adv Urol        ISSN: 1756-2872


  14 in total

Review 1.  Stented versus nonstented pediatric pyeloplasty: a modern series and review of the literature.

Authors:  Karen E Smith; Nicholas Holmes; Jeremy I Lieb; James Mandell; Laurence S Baskin; Barry A Kogan; R Dixon Walker
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: evolution of a new gold standard.

Authors:  D A Moon; M A El-Shazly; C M Chang; T R Gianduzzo; C G Eden
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Usefulness of short-term retrievable ureteral stent in pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Selcuk Yucel; Mindy L Samuelson; Michael T Nguyen; Linda A Baker
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Direct extracorporeal ureteric stenting during laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a novel technique.

Authors:  Andrei Nadu; Yoram Mor; Jacob Ramon
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Novel technique of retrograde ureteral stenting during laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Krishnanath Gaitonde; Gwen Roesel; James Donovan
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Insertion of an internal-external nephroureteral stent during pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty: description of the technique.

Authors:  Alessandro Taveres; Numchai Manaboriboon; Armando J Lorenzo; Walid A Farhat
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  A novel “no-touch” robot-assisted laparoscopic technique facilitates ureteral reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Kelly A Swords; Alejandro R Rodriguez; Mark A Rich; Hubert S Swana
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

8.  The indwelling ureteric stent: a 'friendly' procedure with unfriendly high morbidity.

Authors:  S Richter; A Ringel; M Shalev; I Nissenkorn
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Complications and length of hospital stay following stented and unstented paediatric pyeloplasties.

Authors:  S Hussain; J D Frank
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1994-01

10.  Is antegrade stenting superior to retrograde stenting in laparoscopic pyeloplasty?

Authors:  Anil Mandhani; Shailendra Goel; Mahendra Bhandari
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  3 in total

1.  Tubeless outpatient robotic upper urinary tract reconstruction in the pediatric population: short-term assessment of safety.

Authors:  Eric J Fichtenbaum; Andrew C Strine; Charles W Concodora; Marion Schulte; Paul H Noh
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-06-21

2.  Is confirmation of ureteric stent placement in laparoscopic pyeloplasty necessary?

Authors:  D B Hennessey; N J Kinnear; R M Evans; C Hagan; A Thwaini
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-03-04       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 3.  How small is small enough? Role of robotics in paediatric urology.

Authors:  Arvind P Ganpule; Venkat Sripathi
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.407

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.