Literature DB >> 28639117

Tubeless outpatient robotic upper urinary tract reconstruction in the pediatric population: short-term assessment of safety.

Eric J Fichtenbaum1, Andrew C Strine2, Charles W Concodora2, Marion Schulte2, Paul H Noh2.   

Abstract

Robotic upper urinary tract reconstruction (UUTR) has been widely utilized for surgical management of congenital obstruction. To further reduce morbidity and simplify postoperative care, outpatient robotic pyeloplasty (RP) and robotic ureteroureterostomy (RUU) were performed without ureteral stents, drains, or urethral catheters. The aim of the study was to assess the safety of performing tubeless robotic UUTR as an outpatient procedure. A retrospective review was performed for patients who underwent outpatient tubeless RP and RUU between July 2015 and January 2017. All procedures were primary interventions. No ureteral stents, drains, or urethral catheters were utilized. No regional blocks were utilized. Patients were discharged from the post anesthesia care unit as a scheduled outpatient procedure without an extended stay. Primary outcomes included 30-day complications, emergency room (ER) visits, and readmissions. A total of 19 patients (14 male, 5 female) were identified (RP = 17, RUU = 3), including one patient who underwent staged bilateral RP. Median age was 21.5 months (range 3-220). Median weight was 11.5 kg (range 6-89). Median operative time was 167 min (range 108-249), defined as skin incision to closure. No 30-day complications, ER visits, or readmissions were observed for any patient. The study concludes that pediatric tubeless outpatient robotic UUTR is safe. Further evaluation is needed to assess this approach on a larger scale, as well as assessing the long-term outcomes of tubeless reconstruction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ambulatory surgical procedures; Pediatrics; Surgical procedures, robotic; Ureteral obstruction

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28639117     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-017-0722-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  16 in total

1.  PSYCHOLOGICAL RESPONSES OF CHILDREN TO HOSPITALIZATION. A COMPARISON OF HOSPITALIZED AND NONHOSPITALIZED TWINS.

Authors:  R R SIPOWICZ; D T VERNON
Journal:  Am J Dis Child       Date:  1965-03

2.  Dexterity enhancement with robotic surgery.

Authors:  K Moorthy; Y Munz; A Dosis; J Hernandez; S Martin; F Bello; T Rockall; A Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-04-06       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The risk factors and clinical significance of acute postoperative complications after unstented pediatric pyeloplasty: a single surgeon's experience.

Authors:  Yong Seung Lee; Cho Nyeong Lee; Myung Up Kim; Won Sik Jang; Hyeyoung Lee; Young Jae Im; Sang Won Han
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 2.545

4.  Pediatric robot assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: comparison with a cohort of open surgery.

Authors:  Richard S Lee; Alan B Retik; Joseph G Borer; Craig A Peters
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  The indwelling ureteric stent: a 'friendly' procedure with unfriendly high morbidity.

Authors:  S Richter; A Ringel; M Shalev; I Nissenkorn
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Stentless pediatric robotic pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Alejandro R Rodriguez; Mark A Rich; Hubert S Swana
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2012-04

7.  A prospective study of safety and satisfaction with same-day discharge after laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Fuad Alkhoury; Cathy Burnweit; Leopoldo Malvezzi; Colin Knight; Jeannette Diana; Raquel Pasaron; JoAnne Mora; Pradeep Nazarey; Alexandra Aserlind; Steven Stylianos
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.545

8.  Indwelling ureteral stents: evaluation of symptoms, quality of life and utility.

Authors:  H B Joshi; A Stainthorpe; R P MacDonagh; F X Keeley; A G Timoney; Michael J Barry
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Global minimally invasive pyeloplasty study in children: Results from the Pediatric Urology Expert Group of the European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists working party.

Authors:  M S Silay; A F Spinoit; S Undre; V Fiala; Z Tandogdu; T Garmanova; A Guttilla; A A Sancaktutar; B Haid; M Waldert; A Goyal; E C Serefoglu; E Baldassarre; G Manzoni; A Radford; R Subramaniam; A Cherian; P Hoebeke; M Jacobs; B Rocco; R Yuriy; Fabio Zattoni; R Kocvara; C J Koh
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 1.830

10.  Contemporary national comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted laparoscopic pediatric pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Dennis B Liu; Chandy Ellimoottil; Andrew S Flum; Jessica T Casey; Edward M Gong
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 1.830

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.