Amy J Hoffman1. 1. College of Nursing, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA. ahoffman32@aol.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In today's world, greater patient empowerment is imperative because 90 million Americans live with 1 or more chronic conditions such as cancer. Evidence reveals that healthy behaviors such as effective symptom self-management can prevent or reduce much of the suffering from cancer. Oncology nurses play a pivotal role in developing a symptom self-management plan that is critical to optimizing a patient's symptom self-management behaviors. OBJECTIVE: This article uses exemplars to describe how oncology nurses can apply a tested middle-range theory, the Theory of Symptom Self-management, to clinical practice by incorporating interventions to increase a patient's perceived self-efficacy to optimize patient outcomes. METHODS: The Theory of Symptom Self-management provides a means to understand the dynamic aspects of symptom self-management and provides a tested framework for the development of efficacy-enhancing interventions for use by oncology nurses in clinical practice. RESULTS: Exemplars based on the Theory of Symptom Self-management depict how oncology nursing can use perceived self-efficacy-enhancing symptom self-management interventions to improve the functional status and quality of life of their patients. CONCLUSION: Guided by a theoretical approach, oncology nurses can have a significant positive impact on the lives of their patients by reducing the symptom burden associated with cancer and its treatment. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Oncology nurses can partner with their patients to design tailored approaches to symptom self-management. These tailored approaches provide the ability to implement patient-specific behaviors that recognize, prevent, relieve, or decrease the timing, intensity, distress, concurrence, and unpleasant quality of symptoms.
BACKGROUND: In today's world, greater patient empowerment is imperative because 90 million Americans live with 1 or more chronic conditions such as cancer. Evidence reveals that healthy behaviors such as effective symptom self-management can prevent or reduce much of the suffering from cancer. Oncology nurses play a pivotal role in developing a symptom self-management plan that is critical to optimizing a patient's symptom self-management behaviors. OBJECTIVE: This article uses exemplars to describe how oncology nurses can apply a tested middle-range theory, the Theory of Symptom Self-management, to clinical practice by incorporating interventions to increase a patient's perceived self-efficacy to optimize patient outcomes. METHODS: The Theory of Symptom Self-management provides a means to understand the dynamic aspects of symptom self-management and provides a tested framework for the development of efficacy-enhancing interventions for use by oncology nurses in clinical practice. RESULTS: Exemplars based on the Theory of Symptom Self-management depict how oncology nursing can use perceived self-efficacy-enhancing symptom self-management interventions to improve the functional status and quality of life of their patients. CONCLUSION: Guided by a theoretical approach, oncology nurses can have a significant positive impact on the lives of their patients by reducing the symptom burden associated with cancer and its treatment. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Oncology nurses can partner with their patients to design tailored approaches to symptom self-management. These tailored approaches provide the ability to implement patient-specific behaviors that recognize, prevent, relieve, or decrease the timing, intensity, distress, concurrence, and unpleasant quality of symptoms.
Authors: Jeffrey M Peppercorn; Thomas J Smith; Paul R Helft; David J Debono; Scott R Berry; Dana S Wollins; Daniel M Hayes; Jamie H Von Roenn; Lowell E Schnipper Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-01-24 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Aanand D Naik; Nynikka Palmer; Nancy J Petersen; Richard L Street; Radha Rao; Maria Suarez-Almazor; Paul Haidet Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2011-03-14
Authors: Kate Lorig; Philip L Ritter; Diana D Laurent; Kathryn Plant; Maurice Green; Valarie Blue Bird Jernigan; Siobhan Case Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2010-03-18 Impact factor: 17.152
Authors: Sharon L Sanders; Erin O Bantum; Jason E Owen; Andrea A Thornton; Annette L Stanton Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: C Ludwig; J Renaud; L Barbera; M Carley; C Henry; L Jolicoeur; C Kuziemsky; A Patry; D Stacey Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 3.677
Authors: Jennie E Ryan; Maia Noeder; Christine Burke; Samuel C Stubblefield; Salwa Sulieman; Elissa G Miller Journal: Pediatr Transplant Date: 2019-05-23
Authors: N Fridriksdottir; S Gunnarsdottir; S Zoëga; B Ingadottir; E J G Hafsteinsdottir Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-09-18 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Charlène Villaron; François Cury; François Eisinger; Maria-A Cappiello; Tanguy Marqueste Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-04-19 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Amy J Hoffman; Ruth Ann Brintnall; Barbara A Given; Alexander von Eye; Lee W Jones; Jean K Brown Journal: Cancer Nurs Date: 2017 Jan/Feb Impact factor: 2.592
Authors: Karly M Murphy; Christina Sauer; Dershung Yang; Niina Hass; Kristian Novakovic; Brian Helfand; Robert Nadler; Benjamin D Schalet; David Victorson Journal: Cancer Nurs Date: 2022 Jan-Feb 01 Impact factor: 2.592