Literature DB >> 22494028

Prospective comparison of outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in elderly patients versus younger patients.

Zeph Okeke1, Arthur D Smith, Gaston Labate, Alessandro D'Addessi, Ramakrishna Venkatesh, Dean Assimos, Willem E M Strijbos, Jean J M C H de la Rosette.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to prospectively compare operative and postoperative characteristics and outcomes in elderly patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) compared with younger patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospectively collected data from the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) Global PCNL Study database were used. Elderly patients were defined as those aged 70 years and above, while younger patients were those between 18 and 70 years of age. Matched and unmatched group comparisons were performed based on imaging modality used for assessing stone-free status. Patient characteristics, operative data, and postoperative outcomes were compared.
RESULTS: The median age of the elderly group vs the young group was 74 years (range 70-93 years) vs 49 years. In the unmatched analysis, staghorn stones were seen at higher rates in the elderly group (27.8% vs 21.8%, P=0.014); however, the mean stone size was not significantly different (465.0 vs 422.8, P=0.063). The length of hospitalization was significantly longer in the elderly group compared with the young group in the unmatched analysis (5 days vs 4.1 days, P<0.001). The same difference was not apparent in the matched analysis (5.0 days vs 4.4 days, P=0.288). Overall complication rates were not significantly different in the unmatched analysis. In the matched analysis, however, a statistically significant higher rate of overall complications was seen. Stone-free rates were similar among all groups.
CONCLUSION: PCNL in elderly patients over the age of 70 years produces results comparable to those seen in younger patients. With only a slightly higher-be it statistically significant-complication rate, the stone-free rate in older patients was the same as in the younger group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22494028     DOI: 10.1089/end.2012.0046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  15 in total

1.  Does aging affect the outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy?

Authors:  Ibrahım Buldu; Abdulkadir Tepeler; Tuna Karatag; Mehmet Nuri Bodakci; Namık Kemal Hatipoglu; Necmettin Penbegul; Tolga Akman; Okan Istanbulluoglu; Abdullah Armagan
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  The evolution of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Analysis of a single institution experience over 25 years.

Authors:  Jennifer Bjazevic; Linda Nott; Philippe D Violette; Thomas Tailly; Marie Dion; John D Denstedt; Hassan Razvi
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Iason Kyriazis; Vasilios Panagopoulos; Panagiotis Kallidonis; Mehmet Özsoy; Marinos Vasilas; Evangelos Liatsikos
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-09-14       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  [S2k guidelines on diagnostics, therapy and metaphylaxis of urolithiasis (AWMF 043/025) : Compendium].

Authors:  T Knoll; T Bach; U Humke; A Neisius; R Stein; M Schönthaler; G Wendt-Nordahl
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 5.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: position, position, position!

Authors:  Zhijian Zhao; Junhong Fan; Yang Liu; Jean de la Rosette; Guohua Zeng
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 6.  Research progress of percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Chao Wei; Yucong Zhang; Gaurab Pokhrel; Xiaming Liu; Jiahua Gan; Xiao Yu; Zhangqun Ye; Shaogang Wang
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  Factors affecting infectious complications following flexible ureterorenoscopy.

Authors:  Faruk Ozgor; Murat Sahan; Alkan Cubuk; Mazhar Ortac; Ali Ayranci; Omer Sarilar
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2018-11-17       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Evaluation of factors predicting clinical pleural injury during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective study.

Authors:  Kuldeep Sharma; Satya Narayan Sankhwar; Vishwajeet Singh; Bhupendra Pal Singh; Diwakar Dalela; Rahul Janak Sinha; Manoj Kumar; Manmeet Singh; Apul Goel
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  Lessons learned from the CROES percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study.

Authors:  Guido M Kamphuis; Joyce Baard; Matias Westendarp; Jean J M C H de la Rosette
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Pulmonary Complications following Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Gili Palnizky; Sarel Halachmi; Michal Barak
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2014-02-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.