Literature DB >> 30448869

Factors affecting infectious complications following flexible ureterorenoscopy.

Faruk Ozgor1, Murat Sahan2, Alkan Cubuk2, Mazhar Ortac2, Ali Ayranci2, Omer Sarilar2.   

Abstract

In the present study, we aimed to clarify predictive factors that may cause postoperative infectious complications after flexible ureterorenoscopy (f-URS). In a 4-year prospective study, charts of patients who underwent f-URS between January 2014 and January 2018 for renal stone(s) in a tertiary academic center were reviewed. A standardized f-URS procedure was performed for all patients. Post-operative infectious complications including fever, sepsis and septic shock were categorized into same group. Patients with and without infectious complications were compared in the terms of preoperative, operative and post operative characteristics. In total, 463 patients who did not face infectious complications and 31 patients who faced infectious complications were enrolled into the study. The mean age was significantly lower in patients who did face infectious complications (34.8 vs 44.7 years old, p < 0.001). On the other hand, presence of renal abnormality was significantly more common in patients with infectious complications (12.3% vs 35.5%, p < 0.001). The mean operation time was 65.3 min in patients with infectious complications and significantly longer when compared with patients who did not face infectious complication (47.8 min, p < 0.001). Stone-free rate was significantly higher in patients without infectious complications (85.3% vs 77.5, p = 0.009). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that longer operation time ≥ 60 min, presence of renal abnormality and age ≤ 40 years were predictive factors for infectious complications following f-URS. The present study has demonstrated that operation time ≥ 60 min, presence of renal abnormality and patients with ≤ 40 years were significantly associated with infectious complications following f-URS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complication; Fever; Flexible ureterorenoscopy; Infectious; Sepsis

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30448869     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-018-1098-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  19 in total

1.  Characterization of intrapelvic pressure during ureteropyeloscopy with ureteral access sheaths.

Authors:  Jamil Rehman; Manoj Monga; Jaime Landman; David I Lee; Tamer Felfela; Marius C Conradie; Rajamahanty Srinivas; Chandru P Sundaram; Ralph V Clayman
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Does age affect outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy?

Authors:  Hossein Karami; Mohammad Mohsen Mazloomfard; Alireza Golshan; Taban Rahjoo; Babak Javanmard
Journal:  Urol J       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.510

3.  Flexible ureterorenoscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy for the management of renal stone burdens that measure 2 to 3 cm: a multi-institutional experience.

Authors:  Elias S Hyams; Ravi Munver; Vincent G Bird; Jayant Uberoi; Ojas Shah
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Retrograde intrarenal surgery in patients with horseshoe kidneys.

Authors:  Gokhan Atis; Berkan Resorlu; Cenk Gurbuz; Ozgur Arikan; Ekrem Ozyuvali; Ali Unsal; Turhan Caskurlu
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus miniaturized PNL for solitary renal calculi of 10-30 mm size.

Authors:  Thomas Knoll; Jan Peter Jessen; Patrick Honeck; Gunnar Wendt-Nordahl
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Prospective comparison of outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in elderly patients versus younger patients.

Authors:  Zeph Okeke; Arthur D Smith; Gaston Labate; Alessandro D'Addessi; Ramakrishna Venkatesh; Dean Assimos; Willem E M Strijbos; Jean J M C H de la Rosette
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Combined electrohydraulic and holmium:YAG laser ureteroscopic nephrolithotripsy of large (greater than 4 cm) renal calculi.

Authors:  Albert J Mariani
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Does a smaller tract in percutaneous nephrolithotomy contribute to high renal pelvic pressure and postoperative fever?

Authors:  Wen Zhong; Guohua Zeng; Kaijun Wu; Xun Li; Wenzhong Chen; Houmeng Yang
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  RIRS versus mPCNL for single renal stone of 2-3 cm: clinical outcome and cost-effective analysis in Chinese medical setting.

Authors:  Jiahua Pan; Qi Chen; Wei Xue; Yonghui Chen; Lei Xia; Haige Chen; Yiran Huang
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2012-12-23       Impact factor: 3.436

10.  Outcomes of retrograde flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for stone disease in patients with anomalous kidneys.

Authors:  İbrahim Mesut Ugurlu; Tolga Akman; Murat Binbay; Erdem Tekinarslan; Özgür Yazıcı; Mehmet Fatih Akbulut; Faruk Özgör; Ahmet Yaser Müslümanoğlu
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.436

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Correlation of Operative Time with Outcomes of Ureteroscopy and Stone Treatment: a Systematic Review of Literature.

Authors:  Jenni Lane; Lily Whitehurst; B M Zeeshan Hameed; Theodoros Tokas; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Ureteroscopy with thulium fiber laser lithotripsy results in shorter operating times and large cost savings.

Authors:  James R Ryan; Mitchell H Nguyen; Joshua A Linscott; Samuel W Nowicki; Evelyn James; Brian M Jumper; Maria Ordoñez; Johann P Ingimarsson
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 3.661

3.  The Risk Factors of Febrile Urinary Tract Infection After Ureterorenoscopic Lithotripsy.

Authors:  Futoshi Morokuma; Eiji Sadashima; Soutaro Chikamatsu; Tomoya Nakamura; Yusuke Hayakawa; Noriaki Tokuda
Journal:  Kobe J Med Sci       Date:  2020-09-10

4.  The feasibility of one-stage flexible ureteroscopy lithotripsy in solitary kidney patients with 1-3 cm renal stones and risk factors of renal function changes.

Authors:  Yang Pan; Han Chen; Hualin Chen; Xiaoxiang Jin; Yunxiao Zhu; Gang Chen
Journal:  Ren Fail       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 2.606

5.  Comparative evaluation of retrograde intrarenal surgery, antegrade ureterorenoscopy and laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in the treatment of impacted proximal ureteral stones larger than 1.5 cm.

Authors:  Yavuz Güler; Akif Erbin
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2021-01-23

Review 6.  Risk factors for infectious complications after retrograde intrarenal surgery - a systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Authors:  Bartosz Dybowski; Ewa Bres-Niewada; Marzena Rzeszutko; Aleksandra Tkaczyk; Barbara Woźniak; Marta Wójcik; Zuzanna Znajdek
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2021-09-09

7.  Development and validation of a novel nomogram for predicting systemic inflammatory response syndrome's occurrence in patients undertaking flexible ureteroscopy.

Authors:  Zijun Xuan; Zhikang Yu; Guobin Tan; Ning Ding; Huibin He; Shichao Yu; Guoqing Liu; Xiping Zhu; Bo Zhu; Zhe Liu
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2022-02

8.  A Novel Nomogram for Predicting Post-Operative Sepsis for Patients With Solitary, Unilateral and Proximal Ureteral Stones After Treatment Using Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy or Flexible Ureteroscopy.

Authors:  Jian-Xuan Sun; Jin-Zhou Xu; Chen-Qian Liu; Yang Xun; Jun-Lin Lu; Meng-Yao Xu; Ye An; Jia Hu; Cong Li; Qi-Dong Xia; Shao-Gang Wang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-04-15

Review 9.  Risk of Sepsis in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Mariela Corrales; Alba Sierra; Steeve Doizi; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2022-08-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.