Literature DB >> 22493428

Nanog increases focal adhesion kinase (FAK) promoter activity and expression and directly binds to FAK protein to be phosphorylated.

Baotran Ho1, Gretchen Olson, Sheila Figel, Irwin Gelman, William G Cance, Vita M Golubovskaya.   

Abstract

Nanog and FAK were shown to be overexpressed in cancer cells. In this report, the Nanog overexpression increased FAK expression in 293, SW480, and SW620 cancer cells. Nanog binds the FAK promoter and up-regulates its activity, whereas Nanog siRNA decreases FAK promoter activity and FAK mRNA. The FAK promoter contains four Nanog-binding sites. The site-directed mutagenesis of these sites significantly decreased up-regulation of FAK promoter activity by Nanog. EMSA showed the specific binding of Nanog to each of the four sites, and binding was confirmed by ChIP assay. Nanog directly binds the FAK protein by pulldown and immunoprecipitation assays, and proteins co-localize by confocal microscopy. Nanog binds the N-terminal domain of FAK. In addition, FAK directly phosphorylates Nanog in a dose-dependent manner by in vitro kinase assay and in cancer cells in vivo. The site-directed mutagenesis of Nanog tyrosines, Y35F and Y174F, blocked phosphorylation and binding by FAK. Moreover, overexpression of wild type Nanog increased filopodia/lamellipodia formation, whereas mutant Y35F and Y174F Nanog did not. The wild type Nanog increased cell invasion that was inhibited by the FAK inhibitor and increased by FAK more significantly than with the mutants Y35F and Y174F Nanog. Down-regulation of Nanog with siRNA decreased cell growth reversed by FAK overexpression. Thus, these data demonstrate the regulation of the FAK promoter by Nanog, the direct binding of the proteins, the phosphorylation of Nanog by FAK, and the effect of FAK and Nanog cross-regulation on cancer cell morphology, invasion, and growth that plays a significant role in carcinogenesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22493428      PMCID: PMC3365765          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M111.322883

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  62 in total

1.  Expression and interdependencies of pluripotency factors LIN28, OCT3/4, NANOG and SOX2 in human testicular germ cells and tumours of the testis.

Authors:  A J M Gillis; H Stoop; K Biermann; R J H L M van Gurp; E Swartzman; S Cribbes; A Ferlinz; M Shannon; J W Oosterhuis; L H J Looijenga
Journal:  Int J Androl       Date:  2011-06-02

2.  Epigenetic Nanog regulation and the role of functional heterogeneity.

Authors:  Maria Herberg; Ingo Roeder
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 4.534

3.  Tumor-initiating stem cells of squamous cell carcinomas and their control by TGF-β and integrin/focal adhesion kinase (FAK) signaling.

Authors:  Markus Schober; Elaine Fuchs
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Expression of NANOG in human gliomas and its relationship with undifferentiated glioma cells.

Authors:  Chao-Shi Niu; Dong-Xue Li; Yu-Hai Liu; Xian-Ming Fu; Shen-Feng Tang; Jing Li
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 3.906

5.  Markedly increased Oct4 and Nanog expression correlates with cisplatin resistance in oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Lo-Lin Tsai; Cheng-Chia Yu; Yu-Chao Chang; Chuan-Hang Yu; Ming-Yung Chou
Journal:  J Oral Pathol Med       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 4.253

6.  Direct reprogramming of stem cell properties in colon cancer cells by CD44.

Authors:  Ying-Jhen Su; Hsin-Mei Lai; Yi-Wen Chang; Guan-Ying Chen; Jia-Lin Lee
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  Malignant transformation of 293 cells induced by ectopic expression of human Nanog.

Authors:  Yan-Li Lin; Zheng-Bin Han; Fu-Yin Xiong; Li-Yuan Tian; Xiao-Jie Wu; Shi-Wei Xue; Yan-Rong Zhou; Ji-Xian Deng; Hong-Xing Chen
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 3.396

8.  Expression of the stem cell marker, Nanog, in human endometrial adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Xi Zhou; Yu-Ping Zhou; Guang-Rong Huang; Bao-Lan Gong; Bo Yang; Dong-Xia Zhang; Pin Hu; Sheng-Rong Xu
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.326

9.  Focal adhesion kinase protein regulates Wnt3a gene expression to control cell fate specification in the developing neural plate.

Authors:  Yuri Fonar; Yoni E Gutkovich; Heather Root; Anastasia Malyarova; Emil Aamar; Vita M Golubovskaya; Sarah Elias; Yaniv M Elkouby; Dale Frank
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 4.138

10.  NANOG promotes cancer stem cell characteristics and prostate cancer resistance to androgen deprivation.

Authors:  C R Jeter; B Liu; X Liu; X Chen; C Liu; T Calhoun-Davis; J Repass; H Zaehres; J J Shen; D G Tang
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 9.867

View more
  31 in total

Review 1.  Targeting the p53 pathway.

Authors:  Vita M Golubovskaya; William G Cance
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 3.495

Review 2.  Concise review: pursuing self-renewal and pluripotency with the stem cell factor Nanog.

Authors:  Arven Saunders; Francesco Faiola; Jianlong Wang
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 6.277

3.  Down-regulation of ALDH1A3, CD44 or MDR1 sensitizes resistant cancer cells to FAK autophosphorylation inhibitor Y15.

Authors:  Vita Golubovskaya; Shalana O'Brien; Baotran Ho; Melissa Heffler; Jeffrey Conroy; Quang Hu; Dan Wang; Song Liu; William G Cance
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  The RNA-editing enzyme ADAR promotes lung adenocarcinoma migration and invasion by stabilizing FAK.

Authors:  Elianna M Amin; Yuan Liu; Su Deng; Kay See Tan; Neel Chudgar; Marty W Mayo; Francisco Sanchez-Vega; Prasad S Adusumilli; Nikolaus Schultz; David R Jones
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 8.192

Review 5.  FAK and Nanog cross talk with p53 in cancer stem cells.

Authors:  Vita M Golubovskaya
Journal:  Anticancer Agents Med Chem       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.505

6.  Pluripotency factor Nanog is tumorigenic by deregulating DNA damage response in somatic cells.

Authors:  J Kim; Y Liu; M Qiu; Y Xu
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 7.  Understanding the roles of FAK in cancer: inhibitors, genetic models, and new insights.

Authors:  Hyunho Yoon; Joshua P Dehart; James M Murphy; Ssang-Taek Steve Lim
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 2.479

Review 8.  Regulation of NANOG in cancer cells.

Authors:  Shuai Gong; Qiuhui Li; Collene R Jeter; Qingxia Fan; Dean G Tang; Bigang Liu
Journal:  Mol Carcinog       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 4.784

Review 9.  FAK in cancer: mechanistic findings and clinical applications.

Authors:  Florian J Sulzmaier; Christine Jean; David D Schlaepfer
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 10.  The role of NANOG transcriptional factor in the development of malignant phenotype of cancer cells.

Authors:  Natalia Gawlik-Rzemieniewska; Ilona Bednarek
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 4.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.