Literature DB >> 22492247

Use of pooled samples from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Samuel P Caudill1.   

Abstract

The National Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) provides an ongoing assessment of the US population's exposure to environmental chemicals by using biomonitoring in conjunction with CDC's National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Characterizing the distributions of concentrations of environmental compounds or their metabolites in the US population is a primary objective of CDC's biomonitoring program. Historically, this characterization has been based on individual measurements of these compounds in body fluid or tissue from representative samples of the population. Pooling samples before making analytical measurements can reduce the costs of biomonitoring by reducing the number of analyses. For the first time in NHANES 2005-2006, a weighted pooled-sample design was implemented to facilitate pooling samples before making analytical measurements. This paper describes this design and the estimation method being developed in the National Center for Environmental Health, Division of Laboratory Sciences (NCEH/DLS) to characterize concentrations of polychlorinated and polybrominated compounds. We present percentile estimates for 2,2 ( ' ) ,4,4 ( ' ) ,5,5 ( ' ) -hexachlorobiphenyl (PCB153) in specific subpopulations of the US based on the NHANES 2005-2006 pooled-sample design. We also compare estimates based on individual samples from NHANES 2003-2004 with estimates based on artificially created pools from NHANES 2003-2004 using a pooled-sample design similar to the one used for NHANES 2005-2006. For NHANES 2005-2006 the number of analyses required to characterize the levels of 61 polychlorinated and 13 polybrominated compounds in the US population was reduced from 2201 to 228. At a cost of $1400 per analytical measurement, this represents a savings of approximately $2.78 million. Published 2012. This article is a US Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Published 2012. This article is a US Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22492247      PMCID: PMC4583195          DOI: 10.1002/sim.5341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  7 in total

1.  Geometric mean estimation from pooled samples.

Authors:  Samuel P Caudill; Wayman E Turner; Donald G Patterson
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 7.086

2.  Characterizing populations of individuals using pooled samples.

Authors:  Samuel P Caudill
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 5.563

3.  Important issues related to using pooled samples for environmental chemical biomonitoring.

Authors:  Samuel P Caudill
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Perfluorochemicals in pooled serum samples from United States residents in 2001 and 2002.

Authors:  Antonia M Calafat; Zsuzsanna Kuklenyik; Samuel P Caudill; John A Reidy; Larry L Needham
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Plan and operation of a health examination survey of U.S. youths 12-17 years of age.

Authors: 
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 1       Date:  1969-09

6.  Plan and operation of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-94. Series 1: programs and collection procedures.

Authors: 
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 1       Date:  1994-07

7.  Polyfluoroalkyl compounds in pooled sera from children participating in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2001-2002.

Authors:  Kayoko Kato; Antonia M Calafat; Lee-Yang Wong; Amal A Wanigatunga; Samuel P Caudill; Larry L Needham
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 9.028

  7 in total
  9 in total

1.  Confidence interval estimation for pooled-sample biomonitoring from a complex survey design.

Authors:  Samuel P Caudill
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 9.621

Review 2.  Pooled biological specimens for human biomonitoring of environmental chemicals: opportunities and limitations.

Authors:  Amy L Heffernan; Lesa L Aylward; Leisa-Maree L Toms; Peter D Sly; Matthew Macleod; Jochen F Mueller
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 5.563

3.  Estimating covariate-adjusted measures of diagnostic accuracy based on pooled biomarker assessments.

Authors:  Christopher S McMahan; Alexander C McLain; Colin M Gallagher; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 2.207

4.  A general framework for the regression analysis of pooled biomarker assessments.

Authors:  Yan Liu; Christopher McMahan; Colin Gallagher
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Biomonitoring of mercury and persistent organic pollutants in Michigan urban anglers and association with fish consumption.

Authors:  Wendy A Wattigney; Elizabeth Irvin-Barnwell; Zheng Li; Angela Ragin-Wilson
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 5.840

6.  Varying-coefficient regression analysis for pooled biomonitoring.

Authors:  Dewei Wang; Xichen Mou; Yan Liu
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Incorporating new technologies into toxicity testing and risk assessment: moving from 21st century vision to a data-driven framework.

Authors:  Russell S Thomas; Martin A Philbert; Scott S Auerbach; Barbara A Wetmore; Michael J Devito; Ila Cote; J Craig Rowlands; Maurice P Whelan; Sean M Hays; Melvin E Andersen; M E Bette Meek; Lawrence W Reiter; Jason C Lambert; Harvey J Clewell; Martin L Stephens; Q Jay Zhao; Scott C Wesselkamper; Lynn Flowers; Edward W Carney; Timothy P Pastoor; Dan D Petersen; Carole L Yauk; Andy Nong
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  A comparison of individual-level vs. hypothetically pooled mercury biomonitoring data from the Maternal Organics Monitoring Study (MOMS), Alaska, 1999-2012.

Authors:  Emily Mosites; Ernesto Rodriguez; Samuel P Caudill; Thomas W Hennessy; James Berner
Journal:  Int J Circumpolar Health       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.228

9.  Spatial and temporal trends of the Stockholm Convention POPs in mothers' milk -- a global review.

Authors:  Johan Fång; Elisabeth Nyberg; Ulrika Winnberg; Anders Bignert; Åke Bergman
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 4.223

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.