| Literature DB >> 22489188 |
Xu-Mei Wang1, Xiao-Qi Hou2, Yu-Qu Zhang2, Rui Yang1, Shi-Fang Feng2, Yan Li1, Yi Ren2.
Abstract
Rheum officinale Baill., an important but endangered medicinal herb, is endemic to China. Inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers were employed to investigate the genetic diversity and differentiation of 12 populations of R. officinale. Thirteen selected primers yielded 189 bright and discernible bands, with an average of 14.54 per primer. The genetic diversity was low at the population level, but pretty high at the species level (H = 0.1008, I = 0.1505, PPB = 28.95% vs. H = 0.3341, I = 0.5000, PPB = 95.24%, respectively) by POPGENE analysis. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) showed that the genetic variation was found mainly among populations (74.38%), in line with the limited gene flow (N(m) = 0.2766) among populations. Mantel test revealed a significant correlation between genetic and geographic distances (r = 0.5381, P = 0.002), indicating the role of geographic isolation in shaping the present population genetic structure. Both Bayesian analysis and UPGMA cluster analysis demonstrated the similar results. Our results imply that the conservation efforts should aim to preserve all the extant populations of this endangered species, and cultivation is proposed in this study.Entities:
Keywords: Rheum officinale; conservation strategy; genetic differentiation; genetic diversity; inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22489188 PMCID: PMC3317748 DOI: 10.3390/ijms13033900
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Sampling details of R. officinale populations in the present study.
| Population | Locality | Longitude (E) | Latitude (N) | Altitude (m) | Sample size | Voucher |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baotianman Reserve, Mt. Funiu, Neixiang county, Henan | 33°29.179′ | 111°54.96′ | 1100 | 20 | Xu-mei Wang 08082417 | |
| Muyu, Mt. Shennongjia, Xingshan county, Hubei | 31°27.088′ | 110°16.172′ | 2908 | 18 | Xu-mei Wang and Xiao-qi Hou 09071101 | |
| Doumugong, Mt. Taibai, Mei county, Shannxi | 34°02.286′ | 107°42.869′ | 2841 | 19 | Xiao-qi Hou 10072001 | |
| Taibaimiao, Ningshan county, Shaanxi | 33°25.406′ | 108°31.833′ | 1878 | 20 | Xiao-qi Hou 10071301 | |
| Mt. Hualong, Pingli county, Shaanxi | 32°01.393′ | 109°21.499′ | 2919 | 20 | Xiao-qi Hou 2010072801 | |
| Daping, Mt. Jinfo, Nanchuan county, Chongqing | 28°58.414′ | 107°11.023′ | 1412 | 5 | Xu-mei Wang and Xiao-qi Hou 09072711 | |
| Nanjiang county, Sichuan | 32°35.668′ | 107°06.78′ | 1809 | 19 | Yu-qu Zhang 10080801 | |
| Hailongtun, Gaoping, Zunyi county, Guizhou | 27°48.766′ | 106°49.097′ | 1252 | 10 | Xu-mei Wang and Xiao-qi Hou 20090731 | |
| Gelachang, Haba, Sanba, Xianggelila county, Yunan | 27°23.219′ | 100°02.754′ | 3995 | 16 | Xiao-qi Hou 09080718 | |
| Parch house, Haba, Sanba, Xianggelila county, Yunan | 27°23.741′ | 100°02.257′ | 3727 | 16 | Xiao-qi Hou 09080720 | |
| Xiaozhongdian, Xianggelila county, Yunan | 27°35.118′ | 99°50.835′ | 3441 | 20 | Xiao-qi Hou 1010202 | |
| Hongxi, Meigu county, Sichuan | 28°40.243′ | 102°58.341′ | 3623 | 16 | Yu-qu Zhang and Xiao-qi Hou 09091824 |
Inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) primers used for ISSR analysis in the present study, Y = (C, T); B = (C, G, T); D = (A, G, T); H = (A, G, T); V = (A, C, G).
| Primer code | Sequence (5′→3′) | Annealing temperature (°C) | No. of amplified bands | No. of polymorphic bands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UBC807 | (AG)8T | 51 | 12 | 12 |
| UBC811 | (GA)8C | 53 | 13 | 11 |
| UBC816 | (CA)8T | 52 | 16 | 15 |
| UBC825 | (AC)8T | 52 | 12 | 11 |
| UBC834 | (AG)8YT | 52 | 14 | 14 |
| UBC835 | (AG)8YC | 52 | 10 | 9 |
| UBC836 | (AG)8YA | 52 | 16 | 16 |
| UBC841 | (GA)8YC | 52 | 15 | 14 |
| UBC842 | (GA)8YG | 56 | 11 | 11 |
| UBC888 | BDB(CA)7 | 52 | 19 | 18 |
| UBC889 | DBD(AC)7 | 52 | 17 | 17 |
| UBC890 | VHV(GT)7 | 56 | 18 | 17 |
| UBC891 | HVH(TG)7 | 52 | 16 | 15 |
| - | - |
Genetic diversity within populations of R. officinale, Na: observed number of alleles; Ne: effective number of alleles; H: Nei’s (1973) gene diversity; I: Shannon’s information index; PPB: percentage of polymorphic bands.
| Populations | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.4457 | 1.2626 | 0.1555 | 0.2332 | 44.57 | |
| 1.4457 | 1.2771 | 0.1614 | 0.2400 | 44.57 | |
| 1.3943 | 1.2210 | 0.1305 | 0.1970 | 39.43 | |
| 1.3657 | 1.2156 | 0.1251 | 0.1877 | 36.57 | |
| 1.4343 | 1.2730 | 0.1563 | 0.2318 | 43.43 | |
| 1.0400 | 1.0213 | 0.0139 | 0.0213 | 4.00 | |
| 1.3200 | 1.1129 | 0.0699 | 0.1115 | 32.00 | |
| 1.1143 | 1.0766 | 0.0435 | 0.0640 | 11.43 | |
| 1.2457 | 1.1737 | 0.0990 | 0.1447 | 24.57 | |
| 1.2229 | 1.1614 | 0.0914 | 0.1329 | 22.29 | |
| 1.1771 | 1.1190 | 0.0688 | 0.1014 | 17.71 | |
| 1.2686 | 1.1613 | 0.0940 | 0.1402 | 26.86 | |
| 1.2895 | 1.1730 | 0.1008 | 0.1505 | 28.95 | |
| 1.9543 | 1.5696 | 0.3341 | 0.5000 | 95.24 |
Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) from 12 populations of R. officinale using 13 inter-simple sequence repeat markers, d.f., degree of freedom; SSD, sum of squares; MSD, mean squared deviations; VC, variance component; TVP, total variance percentage;
| Source of variation | d.f. | SSD | MSD | VC | TVP (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Among populations | 11 | 2076.62 | 207.66 | 24.37 | 74.38 | <0.001 |
| Within populations | 187 | 663.00 | 8.39 | 8.39 | 25.62 | <0.001 |
| Among geographic regions | 2 | 712.42 | 356.21 | 11.42 | 32.89% | <0.001 |
| Within geographic regions | 196 | 2027.20 | 23.30 | 23.30 | 67.11% | <0.001 |
Significance tests after 1000 permutations.
Nei’s (1978) unbiased measures of genetic distance (below diagonal) and genetic identity (above diagonal) between R. officinale populations.
| Population | Pop1 | Pop2 | Pop3 | Pop4 | Pop5 | Pop6 | Pop7 | Pop8 | Pop9 | Pop10 | Pop11 | Pop12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| **** | 0.7674 | 0.8084 | 0.7491 | 0.7928 | 0.6960 | 0.7165 | 0.7238 | 0.6944 | 0.7279 | 0.7072 | 0.7026 | |
| 0.2648 | **** | 0.7455 | 0.7783 | 0.7513 | 0.6690 | 0.6904 | 0.6920 | 0.6890 | 0.7054 | 0.6778 | 0.6903 | |
| 0.2127 | 0.2937 | **** | 0.8022 | 0.8196 | 0.6954 | 0.7258 | 0.7520 | 0.7027 | 0.6922 | 0.6784 | 0.7258 | |
| 0.2889 | 0.2507 | 0.2205 | **** | 0.8108 | 0.7420 | 0.7408 | 0.7770 | 0.6770 | 0.7140 | 0.7289 | 0.7044 | |
| 0.2322 | 0.2859 | 0.1990 | 0.2098 | **** | 0.7347 | 0.7313 | 0.7647 | 0.7084 | 0.7173 | 0.7350 | 0.6925 | |
| 0.3625 | 0.4019 | 0.3633 | 0.2984 | 0.3083 | **** | 0.7499 | 0.8513 | 0.6349 | 0.6627 | 0.6383 | 0.6522 | |
| 0.3334 | 0.3704 | 0.3204 | 0.3000 | 0.3129 | 0.2878 | **** | 0.7997 | 0.6230 | 0.6961 | 0.6543 | 0.6810 | |
| 0.3232 | 0.3682 | 0.2850 | 0.2523 | 0.2683 | 0.1610 | 0.2235 | **** | 0.6851 | 0.7119 | 0.6642 | 0.6888 | |
| 0.3647 | 0.3725 | 0.3528 | 0.3900 | 0.3447 | 0.4542 | 0.4732 | 0.3783 | **** | 0.8064 | 0.7108 | 0.7865 | |
| 0.3175 | 0.3490 | 0.3678 | 0.3369 | 0.3323 | 0.4114 | 0.3623 | 0.3398 | 0.2152 | **** | 0.7364 | 0.7803 | |
| 0.3464 | 0.3890 | 0.3880 | 0.3162 | 0.3079 | 0.4490 | 0.4241 | 0.4092 | 0.3413 | 0.3059 | **** | 0.7040 | |
| 0.3529 | 0.3707 | 0.3204 | 0.3504 | 0.3674 | 0.4275 | 0.3842 | 0.3728 | 0.2401 | 0.2481 | 0.3510 | **** |
Figure 1UPGMA dendrogram based on Nei’s (1978) genetic distances among populations.
Figure 2Genetic relationships among the 12 populations of R. officinale estimated using STRUCTURE program based on ISSR data. The model with K = 3 showed the highest ΔK value.