| Literature DB >> 25249777 |
Yanping Hu1, Xiaolong Xie2, Li Wang1, Huaigang Zhang1, Jian Yang1, Yi Li1.
Abstract
To examine whether cultivation reduced genetic variation in the important Chinese medicinal plant Rheum tanguticum, the levels and distribution of genetic variation were investigated using ISSR markers. Fifty-eight R. tanguticum individuals from five cultivated populations were studied. Thirteen primers were used and a total of 320 DNA bands were scored. High levels of genetic diversity were detected in cultivated R. tanguticum (PPB = 82.19, H = 0.2498, HB = 0.3231, I = 0.3812) and could be explained by the outcrossing system, as well as long-lived and human-mediated seed exchanges. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) showed that more genetic variation was found within populations (76.1%) than among them (23.9%). This was supported by the coefficient of gene differentiation (Gst = 0.2742) and Bayesian analysis (θ B = 0.1963). The Mantel test revealed no significant correlation between genetic and geographic distances among populations (r = 0.1176, p = 0.3686). UPGMA showed that the five cultivated populations were separated into three clusters, which was in good accordance with the results provided by the Bayesian software STRUCTURE (K = 3). A short domestication history and no artificial selection may be an effective way of maintaining and conserving the gene pools of wild R. tanguticum.Entities:
Keywords: ISSR; Polygonaceae; Rheum tanguticum Maxim. ex Balf; cultivated populations; genetic variation
Year: 2014 PMID: 25249777 PMCID: PMC4171762 DOI: 10.1590/s1415-47572014000400010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genet Mol Biol ISSN: 1415-4757 Impact factor: 1.771
Figure 1Locations of the five R. tanguticum populations sampled from Qinghai Province in this study.
Sample information for the five cultivated populations of R. tanguticum used in this study.
| Population | Locality | Longitude (E) | Latitude (N) | Sample size | Vouchers | Altitude (m) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HM | Haomen, Menyuan county, Haibei Prefecture | 100°31′15.2″ | 37°26′13.3″ | 13 | 2006091611 | 2,997 |
| NX | Ningxiu, Zeku county, Huangnan Prefecture | 100°51′6.4″ | 35°11′27.3″ | 11 | 2006091812 | 3,352 |
| ZM | Zhamao, Tongren county, Huangnan Prefecture | 101°55′46.3″ | 35°22′23.6″ | 7 | 2006092115 | 3,099 |
| DHG | Daheigou, Huangyuan county, Xining City | 101°22′18.3″ | 36°43′29.8″ | 14 | 2006092516 | 2,897 |
| QJ | Qunjia, Huangzhong county, Xining city | 101°40′25.3″ | 36°17′30.7″ | 13 | 2006092617 | 2,818 |
Primers used for ISSR amplification and bands amplified in all individuals sampled.
| Primers | Sequence 5′ → 3′ | Tm (°C) | No. of bands studied | No. of polymorphic bands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 809 | (AT)8T | 53.2 | 23 | 20 |
| 811 | (GA)8C | 52.5 | 24 | 20 |
| 825 | (AC)8T | 52.0 | 27 | 25 |
| 834 | (AG)8YT | 53.0 | 29 | 24 |
| 836 | (AG)8YA | 53.0 | 22 | 20 |
| 840 | (GA)8YT | 51.0 | 24 | 18 |
| 841 | (GA)8YC | 53.2 | 23 | 21 |
| 842 | (GA)8YG | 53.2 | 24 | 20 |
| 868 | (GAA)6 | 51.2 | 25 | 20 |
| 888 | BDB(CA)7 | 58.5 | 25 | 19 |
| 889 | DBD(AC)7 | 55.0 | 25 | 17 |
| 890 | VHV(GT)7 | 59.0 | 23 | 21 |
| 891 | HVH(TG)7 | 56.2 | 26 | 18 |
| Total | 320 | 263 |
Y = (C, T); B = (C, G, T); D = (A, G, T); H = (A, G, T); V = (A, C, G).
Genetic diversity indices of the five populations of R. tanguticum.
| Population | H (SE) | I (SE) | PPB (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HM | 0.1885 (0.2071) | 0.2700 (0.0085) | 0.2786 (0.2955) | 51.25 |
| NX | 0.1770 (0.2050) | 0.2674 (0.0085) | 0.2618 (0.2935) | 47.81 |
| ZM | 0.1671 (0.2088) | 0.2807 (0.0096) | 0.2445 (0.2977) | 42.81 |
| DHG | 0.1949 (0.2082) | 0.2789 (0.0080) | 0.2878 (0.2967) | 51.81 |
| QJ | 0.1790 (0.2022) | 0.2590 (0.0082) | 0.2659 (0.2907) | 49.38 |
| Mean at population level | 0.1813 | 0.2712 | 0.2677 | 48.61 |
| Total at species level | 0.2498 | 0.3231 | 0.3812 | 82.19 |
H - Nei’s gene diversity (assuming Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium), H - expected Bayesian heterozygosity (without assuming Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium); I - Shannon’s diversity index; PPB - percentage of polymorphic bands, SE - standard error and SD - standard deviation.
Genetic differentiation calculated among populations of R. tanguticum using different Bayesian approaches.
| Model | θ | f | DIC | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | 2.5% | 97.5% | Mean | SD | 2.5% | 97.5% | ||
| Full model | 0.1963 | 0.0135 | 0.1719 | 0.2244 | 0.0886 | 0.0646 | 0.0051 | 0.0761 | 3876.31 |
| f = 0 model | 0.1862 | 0.0108 | 0.1656 | 0.2083 | 0 | - | - | - | 3883.16 |
| θ | 0 | - | - | - | 0.2801 | 0.0690 | 0.1547 | 0.4241 | 5971.85 |
| f-free model | 0.2490 | 0.0150 | 0.2199 | 0.2784 | 0.4948 | 0.2896 | 0.0257 | 0.9777 | 3980.26 |
θ - analogous to Wright’s F, f - analogous to Wright’s F, DIC - deviance information criterion and SD - standard deviation.
Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) for wild, cultivated and all populations of R. tanguticum examined in this work.
| Source of variation | d.f. | Sum of squares | Mean squares | Variation components | Total variation (%) | p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Among populations | 4 | 539.36 | 134.84 | 9.21 | 23.91 | < 0.0010 |
| Within populations | 53 | 1552.93 | 29.30 | 29.30 | 76.09 | < 0.0010 |
d.f. - degrees of freedom.
Significance tests after 1,000 permutations.
Figure 2Dendrogram of cultivated R. tanguticum obtained by UPGMA cluster analysis. The three clusters obtained in this analysis are identified by different colored circles.
Figure 3Bayesian inference of the number of clusters (K)in R. tanguticum. (A) K was estimated from plots of ad hoc posterior probability models of ΔK. (B) Bayesian admixture proportions (q) of individuals of cultivated R. tanguticum for K = 3. Each individual is represented by a single line broken into K colored segments, with lengths proportional to each of the K-inferred clusters.
Comparison of genetic diversity of cultivated R. tanguticum with other important herbs in cultivated populations.
| Species | Genetic diversity values | Markers | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISSR | Present study | ||
| ISSR | |||
| ISSR | |||
| ISSR | |||
| ISSR | |||
| RAPD | |||
| AFLP |
H - Nei’s gene diversity at the population level, H - Nei’s gene diversity at the species level, PPB - percentage of polymorphic loci at the population level and PPB - percentage of polymorphic loci at the species level.