| Literature DB >> 25170431 |
Madan Mohan Sharma1, Roop Narayan Verma1, Abhijeet Singh1, Amla Batra1.
Abstract
Tylophora indica Burm F. Merrill. is widely used against various diseases owing to the presence an array of medicinally important secondary metabolites. Its stem is bitter, stomachic, stimulates bile secretion, enriches the blood and cures diseases like diabetes, fever, flatulence, hypertension, jaundice, leucorrhoea, urinary disease and upper respiratory tract infection. It is neglected for tissue culture work because of deciduous nature of climbing shrub, facing problems for micropropagation. Hence, in vitro regeneration of complete plantlets was done through indirect organogenesis in Tylophora indica. Calli were produced from in vivo leaves of T. indica on MS medium supplemented with 6-Benzylaminopurine (BAP: 2.0 mg l(-1)) and Indole-3-butyric acid (IBA: 0.5 mg l(-1)). The multiple shoots (12.00 ± 1.50) emerged and elongated on MS medium fortified with Thidiazuron (TDZ: 0.1 mg l(-1)). They were rooted on half strength MS medium having IBA (0.5 mg l(-1)) (7.75 ± 0.25) after 20 days of sub-culturing followed by hardening and acclimatization. During indirect regeneration of plants, chances of somaclonal variations may arise. These variations should be identified to produce true to type plants. Plantlets raised through tissue culture were used to validate the clonal fidelity through Inter simple sequence repeat markers (ISSR). Clonal fidelity is a major consideration in commercial micropropagation using in vitro tissue culture methods. During the study, total 71 clear and distinct bands were produced using 6 primers. The banding pattern of each primer was uniform and comparable to mother plant and showed about 93% homology using un-weighted pair group method with arithmetic averaging (UPGMA). ISSR analysis confirmed the genetic stability of in vitro raised plants.Entities:
Keywords: Clonal fidelity; ISSR markers; Organogenic calli; Tylophora indica; UPGMA
Year: 2014 PMID: 25170431 PMCID: PMC4147081 DOI: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-400
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
Details of primers, bands and polymorphism in revealed by 6 primers used in ISSR–PCR
| Primers | Sequences | Total No. of bands (a) | Total No. of Polymorphic bands (b) | Polymorphism (b/a*100) | Total No. of monomorphic bands (c) | Monomorphism (c/a*100) | Average PIC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (5’→3’) | |||||||
| 807 | AGAGAGAGAGAGAGAGT | 8 | 7 | 87.50 | 1 | 12.50 | 0.5 |
| 812 | GAGAGAGAGAGAGAGAA | 16 | 6 | 37.500 | 10 | 62.50 | 0.82812 |
| 825 | ACACACACACACACACT | 12 | 4 | 33.333 | 8 | 66.66 | 0.875 |
| 827 | ACACACACACACACACC | 11 | 11 | 100.000 | 0 | 0 | 0.56818 |
| 840 | GAGAGAGAGAGAGAGAYT | 5 | 3 | 60.000 | 2 | 40 | 0.7 |
| 846 | CACACACACACACACART | 19 | 10 | 52.632 | 9 | 47.36 | 0.71052 |
| Total | 71 | 41 | 57.74 | 30 | 42.26 | 0.57 |
*= Multiply.
Figure 1Indirect regeneration of . A. Callus induced from the leaf and further regeneration of shoots. B. Shoot organogenesis from callus on MS medium along with BAP (2.0 mg l-1) and IBA (0.5 mg l-1). C. In vitro elongation of shoots on TDZ (0.1 mg l-1) and further root induction on 1/2 MS medium with IBA (0.5 mg l-1). D. Hardening in the plant growth chamber. E. Hardened plants in thermocol cups.
Effect of plant growth regulators for callus induction, their further proliferation into multiple shoots through leaf explants
| Plant growth regulators (mg l -1) | Leaf derived calli | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAP | NAA | 2,4-D | IBA | % response | Number of shoots/explant*Mean ± S.E. t 0.05 |
| 0.5 | 20 | 2.25±0.10 | |||
| 1.0 | 35 | 2.88±0.50 | |||
| 1.5 | 40 | 3.15±0.22 | |||
| 2.0 | 48 | 6.11±1.50 | |||
| 2.5 | 46 | 5.50±0.40 | |||
| 3.0 | 30 | 4.90±0.10 | |||
| 3.5 | 23 | 3.10±0.20 | |||
| 2.0 | 0.5 | 19 | 2.20±0.10 | ||
| 2.0 | 1.0 | 22 | 2.45±0.15 | ||
| 2.0 | 2.0 | 35 | 2.75±0.25 | ||
| 2.0 | 3.0 | 37 | 3.55±1.50 | ||
| 2.0 | 4.0 | 28 | 3.40±0.40 | ||
| 2.0 | 5.0 | 16 | 2.90±0.10 | ||
| 2.0 | 0.5 | 9 | 0.90±1.05 | ||
| 2.0 | 1.0 | 12 | 1.15±0.22 | ||
| 2.0 | 2.0 | 20 | 1.91±0.54 | ||
| 2.0 | 3.0 | 31 | 3.15±0.42 | ||
| 2.0 | 4.0 | 24 | 2.56±0.56 | ||
| 2.0 | 5.0 | 21 | 2.14±0.15 | ||
| 2.0 | 0.025 | 80 | 11.14±0.90 | ||
| 2.0 | 0.5 | 95 | 12.00±1.50 | ||
| 2.0 | 1.0 | 75 | 9.28±1.00 | ||
| 2.0 | 2.0 | 68 | 8.75±0.80 | ||
| 2.0 | 3.0 | 55 | 6.45±0.25 | ||
*= Multiply.
Influence of half strength of MS salts along with various auxins on rooting response
| Plant growth regulators (mg l -1) | % response of rooting | No. of roots per cuttings | Days taken for the emergence of roots | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| *Mean ± S.E. t 0.05 | ||||
| IBA | IAA | |||
| 0.05 | 10% | 1.10±0.41 | 15-16 | |
| 0.1 | 28% | 2.25±0.24 | 12 | |
| 0.2 | 35% | 3.14±0.56 | 11-12 | |
| 0.3 | 45% | 4.45±0.58 | 11 | |
| 0.4 | 72% | 6.65±0.85 | 10 | |
| 0.5 | 85% | 7.75±0.25 | 20 | |
| 0.05 | 5% | 1.05±0.10 | 14-16 | |
| 0.1 | 15% | 1.08±0.51 | 13 | |
| 0.2 | 25% | 2.10±0.65 | 12-13 | |
| 0.3 | 45% | 4.45±0.52 | 11 | |
| 0.4 | 35% | 3.35±0.54 | 12 | |
| 0.5 | 22% | 2.36±0.26 | 13 | |
*= Multiply.
Figure 2ISSR products of amplified along with marker DNA/EcoR I-Hind III. A. ISSR primer- 807. B. ISSRprimer- 812. C. ISSRprimer- 825. D. ISSRprimer- 827. E. ISSRprimer- 840. F. ISSRprimer- 846.
DNA bands of Tylophora accessions compared with primers
| Primer | Size (bp) | T 1 | T 2 | T 3 | T 4 | Primer | Size (bp) | T 1 | T 2 | T 3 | T 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 807 | 676 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 827 | 302 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 714 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 554 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 857 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 584 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 1140 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 634 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 1185 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 654 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 1375 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 743 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 1398 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 831 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 1421 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 878 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 812 | 240 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1248 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 313 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1534 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 396 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1584 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 441 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 840 | 724 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| 662 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 802 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 801 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1201 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 845 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1225 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 916 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1904 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 947 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 846 | 202 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1237 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 318 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 1242 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 408 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 1375 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 486 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1467 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 612 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2027 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 714 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2096 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 738 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2125 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 768 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 825 | 664 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 794 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| 685 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 831 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 696 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 862 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 718 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 947 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 795 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 965 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 872 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1250 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 947 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1475 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 1185 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1886 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 1202 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1898 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 1676 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2027 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 1712 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2046 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 1975 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
Figure 3Consensus tree for four Tylophora accession developed on the basis of their banding patterns with ISSR markers.