PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of contrast agents with different relaxivity on the partition coefficient (λ) and timing of equilibration using a modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) sequence in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: MOLLI was acquired in 20 healthy subjects (1.5T) at the mid-ventricular short axis precontrast and 5, 10, 20, 25, and 30 minutes after administration of a bolus of 0.15 mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) (n = 10) or gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA) (n = 10). T1 times were measured in myocardium and blood pool. λ was approximated by ΔR1(myocardium) /ΔR1(blood) . Values for Gd-BOPTA and Gd-DTPA were compared. Interobserver agreement was evaluated (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]). RESULTS:T1 times of myocardium and blood pool (P < 0.001) and λ (0.42 ± 0.03 and 0.47 ± 0.04, respectively, P < 0.001; excluding 5 minutes for Gd-BOPTA) were significantly lower for Gd-BOPTA than Gd-DTPA. The λ((Gd-DTPA)) showed no significant variation between 5 and 30 minutes. The λ((Gd-BOPTA)) values were significantly lower at 5 minutes compared to other times (0.38 vs. 0.42; P < 0.05). Interobserver agreement for λ values was excellent with Gd-BOPTA (ICC = 0.818) and good for Gd-DTPA (ICC = 0.631). CONCLUSION: The λ((Gd-BOPTA)) values were significantly lower compared to λ((Gd-DTPA)) at the same administered dose. Using Gd-BOPTA, the equilibrium between myocardium and blood pool was not achieved at 5 minutes postcontrast.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of contrast agents with different relaxivity on the partition coefficient (λ) and timing of equilibration using a modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) sequence in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: MOLLI was acquired in 20 healthy subjects (1.5T) at the mid-ventricular short axis precontrast and 5, 10, 20, 25, and 30 minutes after administration of a bolus of 0.15 mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) (n = 10) or gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA) (n = 10). T1 times were measured in myocardium and blood pool. λ was approximated by ΔR1(myocardium) /ΔR1(blood) . Values for Gd-BOPTA and Gd-DTPA were compared. Interobserver agreement was evaluated (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]). RESULTS: T1 times of myocardium and blood pool (P < 0.001) and λ (0.42 ± 0.03 and 0.47 ± 0.04, respectively, P < 0.001; excluding 5 minutes for Gd-BOPTA) were significantly lower for Gd-BOPTA than Gd-DTPA. The λ((Gd-DTPA)) showed no significant variation between 5 and 30 minutes. The λ((Gd-BOPTA)) values were significantly lower at 5 minutes compared to other times (0.38 vs. 0.42; P < 0.05). Interobserver agreement for λ values was excellent with Gd-BOPTA (ICC = 0.818) and good for Gd-DTPA (ICC = 0.631). CONCLUSION: The λ((Gd-BOPTA)) values were significantly lower compared to λ((Gd-DTPA)) at the same administered dose. Using Gd-BOPTA, the equilibrium between myocardium and blood pool was not achieved at 5 minutes postcontrast.
Authors: Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-01-29 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Daniel R Messroghli; Sven Plein; David M Higgins; Kevin Walters; Timothy R Jones; John P Ridgway; Mohan U Sivananthan Journal: Radiology Date: 2006-01-19 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Rebecca E Thornhill; Frank S Prato; Gerald Wisenberg; James A White; Judith Nowell; Anya Sauer Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: H Arheden; M Saeed; C B Higgins; D W Gao; P C Ursell; J Bremerich; R Wyttenbach; M W Dae; M F Wendland Journal: Radiology Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Thomas Schlosser; Peter Hunold; Christoph U Herborn; Heidrun Lehmkuhl; Alexander Lind; Sandra Massing; Jörg Barkhausen Journal: Radiology Date: 2005-07-29 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: M F Wendland; M Saeed; K Lauerma; N Derugin; J Mintorovitch; F M Cavagna; C B Higgins Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 1997-03 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Nadine Kawel-Boehm; Scott J Hetzel; Bharath Ambale-Venkatesh; Gabriella Captur; Christopher J Francois; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Michael Salerno; Shawn D Teague; Emanuela Valsangiacomo-Buechel; Rob J van der Geest; David A Bluemke Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2020-12-14 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Chia-Ying Liu; Yuan-Chang Liu; Colin Wu; Anderson Armstrong; Gustavo J Volpe; Rob J van der Geest; Yongmei Liu; William G Hundley; Antoinette S Gomes; Songtao Liu; Marcelo Nacif; David A Bluemke; João A C Lima Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-07-17 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Erik B Schelbert; Uri Elkayam; Leslie T Cooper; Michael M Givertz; Jeffrey D Alexis; Joan Briller; G Michael Felker; Sandra Chaparro; Angela Kealey; Jessica Pisarcik; James D Fett; Dennis M McNamara Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2017-04-03 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Stefan K Piechnik; Vanessa M Ferreira; Adam J Lewandowski; Ntobeko A B Ntusi; Rajarshi Banerjee; Cameron Holloway; Mark B M Hofman; Daniel M Sado; Viviana Maestrini; Steven K White; Merzaka Lazdam; Theodoros Karamitsos; James C Moon; Stefan Neubauer; Paul Leeson; Matthew D Robson Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2013-01-20 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Marcelo Souto Nacif; Fabio S Raman; Neville Gai; Jacquin Jones; Rob J van der Geest; Christopher T Sibley; Songtao Liu; A Bluemke David Journal: Radiol Bras Date: 2018 Jan-Feb