Literature DB >> 22488464

Science and the sources of hype.

T Caulfield1, C Condit.   

Abstract

It has been suggested that genomic research is frequently inappropriately hyped, in both the popular press and the scientific literature, and that this hype has the potential to create a range of social concerns. This paper maps the complex array of social forces that contribute to the phenomenon of hype, including the pressure to publish, the increasingly intense commercialization agenda, the messaging emanating from research institutions, the news media and, even, the public itself. These numerous and interrelated factors create a 'hype pipeline' that will be difficult to counter without the utilization of a wide range of policy strategies.
Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22488464     DOI: 10.1159/000336533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Genomics        ISSN: 1662-4246            Impact factor:   2.000


  33 in total

1.  Neurodharma Self-Help: Personalized Science Communication as Brain Management.

Authors:  Jenny Eklöf
Journal:  J Med Humanit       Date:  2017-09

2.  Public views on participating in newborn screening using genome sequencing.

Authors:  Yvonne Bombard; Fiona A Miller; Robin Z Hayeems; Carolyn Barg; Celine Cressman; June C Carroll; Brenda J Wilson; Julian Little; Denise Avard; Michael Painter-Main; Judith Allanson; Yves Giguere; Pranesh Chakraborty
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  U.S. National Football League athletes seeking unproven stem cell treatments.

Authors:  Kirstin R W Matthews; Maude L Cuchiara
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.272

4.  Technoscience and Biodiversity Conservation.

Authors:  Christophe Boëte
Journal:  Asian Bioeth Rev       Date:  2018-12-28

5.  Athletes' use of unproven stem cell therapies: adding to inappropriate media hype?

Authors:  Timothy Caulfield; Amy McGuire
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 11.454

6.  Chinese newspaper coverage of (unproven) stem cell therapies and their providers.

Authors:  Ubaka Ogbogu; Li Du; Christen Rachul; Lisa Bélanger; Timothy Caulfield
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.739

7.  Concerns about unintended negative consequences of informing the public about multifactorial risks may be premature for young adult smokers.

Authors:  Erika A Waters; Caroline Kincaid; Annette R Kaufman; Michelle L Stock; Laurel M Peterson; Nicole L Muscanell; Rosanna E Guadagno
Journal:  Br J Health Psychol       Date:  2013-10-01

8.  Operationalizing the Reciprocal Engagement Model of Genetic Counseling Practice: a Framework for the Scalable Delivery of Genomic Counseling and Testing.

Authors:  Tara Schmidlen; Amy C Sturm; Shelly Hovick; Laura Scheinfeldt; J Scott Roberts; Lindsey Morr; Joseph McElroy; Amanda E Toland; Michael Christman; Julianne M O'Daniel; Erynn S Gordon; Barbara A Bernhardt; Kelly E Ormond; Kevin Sweet
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Harm, hype and evidence: ELSI research and policy guidance.

Authors:  Timothy Caulfield; Subhashini Chandrasekharan; Yann Joly; Robert Cook-Deegan
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 11.117

10.  Public attitudes towards genetic testing revisited: comparing opinions between 2002 and 2010.

Authors:  Lidewij Henneman; Eric Vermeulen; Carla G van El; Liesbeth Claassen; Danielle R M Timmermans; Martina C Cornel
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 4.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.