Literature DB >> 22487589

The reliability of point-of-care CD4 testing in identifying HIV-infected pregnant women eligible for antiretroviral therapy.

Coceka N Mnyani1, James A McIntyre, Landon Myer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Point-of-care (POC) CD4 testing may play an important role in identifying individuals who require antiretroviral therapy (ART), particularly during pregnancy. However, there have been no evaluations of POC CD4 testing in pregnant women. We compared the performance of the PIMA POC analyzer with laboratory-based testing in identifying pregnant women eligible for ART. DESIGN AND METHODS: Participants were 296 consecutive HIV-infected pregnant women in a prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV service in Johannesburg, South Africa. Parallel CD4 cell count testing was done using capillary specimens for the PIMA analyzer and venous samples for flow cytometry.
RESULTS: The median age was 28 years, and the median gestation was 19 weeks (interquartile range, IQR, 16-24). The median PIMA and laboratory CD4 cell counts were 352 cells (IQR, 251-491) cells per cubic millimeter and 367 (IQR, 251-524) cells per cubic millimeter, respectively. The mean difference between the PIMA and the laboratory CD4 results was 20.5 (95% confidence interval: 11.7 to 29.3) cells per cubic millimeter with limits of agreement from -133.9 to 175.0. The PIMA correctly identified 93% of women who were ART eligible based on a laboratory CD4 ≤350 cells per cubic millimeter. There was no evidence of variability in the agreement of PIMA and laboratory-based CD4 testing by participant age or gestation.
CONCLUSIONS: These data show good agreement between the PIMA analyzer and laboratory-based CD4 enumeration, comparable to levels in nonpregnant HIV-infected adults. The reliability of the PIMA did not vary with gestation despite the hemodilution of pregnancy. POC CD4 technologies may be used to identify ART-eligible women in prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV settings to help promote the rapid initiation of ART.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22487589     DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e318256b651

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr        ISSN: 1525-4135            Impact factor:   3.731


  23 in total

1.  Evolution of antiretroviral therapy services for HIV-infected pregnant women in Cape Town, South Africa.

Authors:  Landon Myer; Tamsin Phillips; Victoria Manuelli; James McIntyre; Linda-Gail Bekker; Elaine J Abrams
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 3.731

2.  A flow-through cell counting assay for point-of-care enumeration of CD4 T-cells.

Authors:  Simon Bystryak; Rajiv P Bandwar; Rasa Santockyte
Journal:  J Virol Methods       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 2.014

Review 3.  Developments in CD4 and viral load monitoring in resource-limited settings.

Authors:  Christopher F Rowley
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Performance evaluation of the MBio Diagnostics point-of-care CD4 counter.

Authors:  Cathy Logan; Monique Givens; Jeffrey T Ives; Marie Delaney; Michael J Lochhead; Robert T Schooley; Constance A Benson
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 2.303

5.  Optimizing PMTCT service delivery in rural North-Central Nigeria: protocol and design for a cluster randomized study.

Authors:  Muktar H Aliyu; Meridith Blevins; Carolyn Audet; Bryan E Shepherd; Adiba Hassan; Obinna Onwujekwe; Usman I Gebi; Marcia Kalish; Mary Lou Lindegren; Sten H Vermund; C William Wester
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 2.226

6.  Laboratory and field evaluation of the Partec CyFlow miniPOC for absolute and relative CD4 T-cell enumeration.

Authors:  Djibril Wade; Papa Alassane Diaw; Géraldine Daneau; Abdoul Aziz Diallo; Souleymane Mboup; Tandakha Ndiaye Dieye; Luc Kestens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A meta-analysis of the performance of the Pima™ CD4 for point of care testing.

Authors:  Lesley E Scott; Jennifer Campbell; Larry Westerman; Luc Kestens; Lara Vojnov; Luciana Kohastsu; John Nkengasong; Trevor Peter; Wendy Stevens
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 8.775

8.  Errors generated by a point-of-care CD4+ T-lymphocyte analyser: a retrospective observational study in nine countries.

Authors:  Emmanuel Fajardo; Carol Metcalf; Erwan Piriou; Monique Gueguen; David Maman; Pascale Chaillet; Vivian Cox; Maryam B Rumaney; Syanness Tunggal; Cara Kosack; Teri Roberts
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 9.408

9.  CD4 T-cell enumeration in a field setting: evaluation of CyFlow counter using the CD4 easy count kit-dry and Pima CD4 systems.

Authors:  Djibril Wade; Papa Alassane Diaw; Géraldine Daneau; Makhtar Camara; Tandakha Ndiaye Dieye; Souleymane Mboup; Luc Kestens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Implementation of Point-of-Care Diagnostics Leads to Variable Uptake of Syphilis, Anemia and CD4+ T-Cell Count Testing in Rural Maternal and Child Health Clinics.

Authors:  Caroline De Schacht; Carlota Lucas; Nádia Sitoe; Rhoderick Machekano; Patrina Chongo; Marleen Temmerman; Ocean Tobaiwa; Laura Guay; Seble Kassaye; Ilesh V Jani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.