Literature DB >> 22486166

Inter-observer variability in the histological assessment of colorectal polyps detected through the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme.

Fiona A Foss1, Steve Milkins, Angus H McGregor.   

Abstract

AIMS: Although effective clinical management of colorectal polyps detected through the National Health Service (NHS) Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) is dependent on the quality of pathological diagnosis, there have been few attempts to formally evaluate inter-observer variability in histological assessment. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of inter-observer variability on the reported prevalence of prognostic features in a large series of screen-detected colorectal polyps. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A retrospective series of 1329 screen-detected polyps (2008-10) was identified from computerized records at two histopathology departments participating in the NHS BCSP. Slides from a sample of 239 polyps were exchanged between centres for independent review and measurement of inter-observer (kappa) agreement. There were significant between-centre differences in the prevalence of polyps with high-risk histological features. Diagnostic review demonstrated good reliability with respect to the assessment of adenomatous change (κ = 0.83), excision margin status (κ = 0.74), high-grade dysplasia (0.61) and invasive malignancy (κ = 0.84). By contrast, there were significant inter-observer differences in the classification of villous lesions (0.18) despite recent efforts to standardize reporting practice.
CONCLUSIONS: Inter-observer variability in the assessment of screen-detected colorectal polyps limits the prognostic value of histological subtyping and highlights the need for clarification of existing diagnostic criteria.
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22486166     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2011.04154.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Histopathology        ISSN: 0309-0167            Impact factor:   5.087


  14 in total

1.  Histological features associated with diagnostic agreement in atypical ductal hyperplasia of the breast: illustrative cases from the B-Path study.

Authors:  Kimberly H Allison; Mara H Rendi; Sue Peacock; Tom Morgan; Joann G Elmore; Donald L Weaver
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 5.087

2.  Polypectomy practices of sub-centimeter polyps in the English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme.

Authors:  Said Din; Alex J Ball; Eleanor Taylor; Matthew Rutter; Stuart A Riley; Shawinder Johal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Interobserver Agreement in Assessing Dysplasia in Colorectal Adenomatous Polyps: A Multicentric Iranian Study.

Authors:  Tahmineh Mollasharifi; Mahsa Ahadi; Elena Jamali; Afshin Moradi; Parisa Asghari; Saman Maroufizadeh; Behrang Kazeminezhad
Journal:  Iran J Pathol       Date:  2020-04-05

4.  Understanding diagnostic variability in breast pathology: lessons learned from an expert consensus review panel.

Authors:  Kimberly H Allison; Lisa M Reisch; Patricia A Carney; Donald L Weaver; Stuart J Schnitt; Frances P O'Malley; Berta M Geller; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 5.087

5.  Underwater versus conventional endoscopic resection of nondiminutive nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: a prospective randomized controlled trial (with video).

Authors:  Andrew W Yen; Joseph W Leung; Machelle D Wilson; Felix W Leung
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Randomised comparison of postpolypectomy surveillance intervals following a two-round baseline colonoscopy: the Japan Polyp Study Workgroup.

Authors:  Takahisa Matsuda; Takahiro Fujii; Yasushi Sano; Shin-Ei Kudo; Yasushi Oda; Kinichi Hotta; Tadakazu Shimoda; Yutaka Saito; Nozomu Kobayashi; Masau Sekiguchi; Kazuo Konishi; Hiroaki Ikematsu; Hiroyasu Iishi; Yoji Takeuchi; Masahiro Igarashi; Kiyonori Kobayashi; Miwa Sada; Yuichiro Yamaguchi; Kiwamu Hasuda; Tomoaki Shinohara; Hideki Ishikawa; Yoshitaka Murakami; Hirokazu Taniguchi; Takahiro Fujimori; Yoichi Ajioka; Shigeaki Yoshida
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland/Public Health England post-polypectomy and post-colorectal cancer resection surveillance guidelines.

Authors:  Matthew D Rutter; James East; Colin J Rees; Neil Cripps; James Docherty; Sunil Dolwani; Philip V Kaye; Kevin J Monahan; Marco R Novelli; Andrew Plumb; Brian P Saunders; Siwan Thomas-Gibson; Damian J M Tolan; Sophie Whyte; Stewart Bonnington; Alison Scope; Ruth Wong; Barbara Hibbert; John Marsh; Billie Moores; Amanda Cross; Linda Sharp
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 31.793

8.  Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence-Augmented Digital System for Histologic Classification of Colorectal Polyps.

Authors:  Mustafa Nasir-Moin; Arief A Suriawinata; Bing Ren; Xiaoying Liu; Douglas J Robertson; Srishti Bagchi; Naofumi Tomita; Jason W Wei; Todd A MacKenzie; Judy R Rees; Saeed Hassanpour
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-11-01

9.  Correlation of LINE-1 Hypomethylation With Size and Pathologic Extent of Dysplasia in Colorectal Tubular Adenomas.

Authors:  Alice C Jiang; Lela Buckingham; Faraz Bishehsari; Stephanie Sutherland; Karen Ma; Joshua E Melson
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.488

Review 10.  Post-polypectomy surveillance colonoscopy: Comparison of the updated guidelines.

Authors:  Naim Abu-Freha; Lior H Katz; Revital Kariv; Elez Vainer; Ido Laish; Nathan Gluck; Elizabeth E Half; Zohar Levi
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 4.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.