Literature DB >> 22484569

Open abdomen treatment with dynamic sutures and topical negative pressure resulting in a high primary fascia closure rate.

Reinhold Kafka-Ritsch1, Matthias Zitt, Nina Schorn, Sebastian Stroemmer, Stefan Schneeberger, Johann Pratschke, Alexander Perathoner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Open abdomen (OA) treatment with negative-pressure therapy is a novel treatment option for a variety of abdominal conditions. We here present a cohort of 160 consecutive OA patients treated with negative pressure and a modified adaptation technique for dynamic retention sutures.
METHODS: From May 2005 to October 2010, a total of 160 patients--58 women (36 %); median age 66 years (21-88 years); median Mannheim peritonitis index 25 (5-43) underwent emergent laparotomy for diverse abdominal conditions (abdominal sepsis 78 %, ischemia 16 %, other 6 %).
RESULTS: Hospital mortality was 21 % (13 % died during OA treatment); delayed primary fascia closure was 76 % in the intent-to-treat population and 87 % in surviving patients. Six patients required reoperation for abdominal abscess and five patients for anastomotic leakage; enteric fistulas were observed in five (3 %) patients. In a multivariate analysis, factors correlating significantly with high fascia closure rate were limited surgery at the emergency operation and a Björk index of 1 or 2; factors correlating significantly with low fascia closure rate were male sex and generalized peritonitis.
CONCLUSIONS: With the aid of initially placed dynamic retention sutures, OA treatment with negative pressure results in high rates of delayed primary fascia closure. OA therapy with the technical modifications described is thus considered a suitable treatment option in various abdominal emergencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22484569     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-012-1586-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  26 in total

1.  Damage control in trauma and abdominal sepsis.

Authors:  Brett H Waibel; Michael F Rotondo
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  Damage control surgery in a non-trauma setting.

Authors:  J O Jansen; M A Loudon
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Damage control with abdominal vacuum therapy (VAC) to manage perforated diverticulitis with advanced generalized peritonitis--a proof of concept.

Authors:  Alexander Perathoner; Alexander Klaus; Gilbert Mühlmann; Michael Oberwalder; Raimund Margreiter; Reinhold Kafka-Ritsch
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Multicentre prospective study of fascial closure rate after open abdomen with vacuum and mesh-mediated fascial traction.

Authors:  S Acosta; T Bjarnason; U Petersson; B Pålsson; A Wanhainen; M Svensson; K Djavani; M Björck
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Surgical strategies for management of the open abdomen.

Authors:  Justin L Regner; Leslie Kobayashi; Raul Coimbra
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 6.  Prognostic indices in peritonitis.

Authors:  C Ohmann; T Hau
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug

7.  Prospective evaluation of vacuum-assisted fascial closure after open abdomen: planned ventral hernia rate is substantially reduced.

Authors:  Preston R Miller; J Wayne Meredith; James C Johnson; Michael C Chang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 8.  Update on open abdomen management: achievements and challenges.

Authors:  Rao R Ivatury
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Continuous retention suture for the management of open abdomen: a high rate of delayed fascial closure.

Authors:  F Gäddnäs; J Saarnio; T Ala-Kokko; J Laurila; V Koivukangas
Journal:  Scand J Surg       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.360

Review 10.  Surgical management of abdominal compartment syndrome; indications and techniques.

Authors:  Ari Leppäniemi
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 2.953

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  EHS clinical guidelines on the management of the abdominal wall in the context of the open or burst abdomen.

Authors:  M López-Cano; J M García-Alamino; S A Antoniou; D Bennet; U A Dietz; F Ferreira; R H Fortelny; P Hernandez-Granados; M Miserez; A Montgomery; S Morales-Conde; F Muysoms; J A Pereira; R Schwab; N Slater; A Vanlander; G H Van Ramshorst; F Berrevoet
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Delayed closure of open abdomen in septic patients treated with negative pressure wound therapy and dynamic fascial suture: the long-term follow-up study.

Authors:  Anna Theresa Hofmann; Simone Gruber-Blum; Michael Lechner; Alexander Petter-Puchner; Karl Glaser; René Fortelny
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Evaluation of the open abdomen classification system: a validity and reliability analysis.

Authors:  Thordur Bjarnason; Agneta Montgomery; Stefan Acosta; Ulf Petersson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  High risk of fistula formation in vacuum-assisted closure therapy in patients with open abdomen due to secondary peritonitis-a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Ioannis Mintziras; Michael Miligkos; Detlef Klaus Bartsch
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Quality of life and hernia development 5 years after open abdomen treatment with vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction.

Authors:  U Petersson; T Bjarnason; M Björck; A Montgomery; P Rogmark; M Svensson; K Sörelius; S Acosta
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Outcome of negative-pressure wound therapy for open abdomen treatment after nontraumatic lower gastrointestinal surgery: analysis of factors affecting delayed fascial closure in 101 patients.

Authors:  Claus Anders Bertelsen; Rasmus Fabricius; Jakob Kleif; Bent Kristensen; Ismail Gögenur
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  The open abdomen - still a challenge for the surgeons. Which is the best technique for temporary abdominal closure? A focus on negative pressure wound therapy.

Authors:  G Popivanov; K Kjossev; V Mutafchiyski
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec

8.  The 'Philadelphia Technique' for abdominal closure.

Authors:  M P McMonagle; C L Kilduff; P Reilly; C Sims
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 9.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the open abdomen and temporary abdominal closure techniques in non-trauma patients.

Authors:  J J Atema; S L Gans; M A Boermeester
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Incisional hernia rate after open abdomen treatment with negative pressure and delayed primary fascia closure.

Authors:  A Brandl; E Laimer; A Perathoner; M Zitt; J Pratschke; R Kafka-Ritsch
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 4.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.