Literature DB >> 22484416

Reoperative characteristics after microfracture of knee cartilage lesions in 454 patients.

G M Salzmann1, B Sah, N P Südkamp, P Niemeyer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: There is only limited information on those patients who fail following microfracture treatment at the knee joint. Evaluation was made of factors associated with treatment failure and clinical outcome assessment among this collective.
METHODS: The study included a total of 560 patients who had previously undergone microfracture for the treatment of symptomatic knee joint cartilage lesions. For the remainder of this study, inclusion criteria were patients that underwent reoperation at the initially operated knee joint (index knee) due to symptoms related to the primary site of microfracture intervention (failure patients) with a minimum postoperative follow-up of 2 years. The remaining cohort of patients served as internal control (non-failure patients). Chart reviews were performed to identify patient and defect characteristics. Patients were evaluated for postoperative Lysholm knee scores, Tegner activity scale, as well as preoperative and postoperative numeric analogue scales (NAS) for function and pain (10 = highest possible function, no pain).
RESULTS: A total of 454/560 (81.1 %) subjects were completely evaluated. Overall, 123/454 patients (26.9 %) (age at operation 43.9 ± 14.1 years, 56 female, BMI 25.8 ± 3.6, 30 smokers, 61.1 ± 68.3 month symptom duration, postoperative follow-up 5.0 ± 2.1) met the inclusion criteria. The postoperative Lysholm score was 63.0 ± 24.6 and the Tegner score was 4.0; NAS function improved from 2.8 ± 1.8 to 4.8 ± 2.2 (P < 0.001), and NAS pain improved from 3.2 ± 2.1 to 5.0 ± 2.4 (P < 0.001). Exclusively, the overall defect size/knee joint was smaller (P = 0.006), postoperative follow-up was longer (P = 0.002), and existense of previous surgery (77.2 vs. 51.6 %, P < 0.001) was more frequent in failure subjects when comparing to non-failure patients (n = 331). The overall clinical outcome among failure subjects was significantly worse when comparing to non-failure subjects. Regression analysis identified that lower preoperative NAS values, being a smoker, and patello-femoral lesions were associated with a higher probability of reoperation.
CONCLUSION: Within the collective presented here, microfracturing was associated with a high frequency of reoperation. Clinical outcome is worse when compared with that of patients without reoperation. Specific parameters can be identified that increase the eventuality of failure following microfracture treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22484416     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-012-1973-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  31 in total

1.  Treatment of full thickness chondral lesions of the knee with microfracture in a group of athletes.

Authors:  Alberto Gobbi; Perrico Nunag; Konrad Malinowski
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2004-05-14       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Surgical management of articular cartilage defects of the knee.

Authors:  A H Gomoll; J Farr; S D Gillogly; J Kercher; T Minas
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Longitudinal evaluation of cartilage repair tissue after microfracture using T2-mapping: a case report with arthroscopic and MRI correlation.

Authors:  José M Mejía Oneto; Jutta Ellermann; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  Biological knee reconstruction: a systematic review of combined meniscal allograft transplantation and cartilage repair or restoration.

Authors:  Joshua D Harris; Matt Cavo; Robert Brophy; Robert Siston; David Flanigan
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Characteristic complications after autologous chondrocyte implantation for cartilage defects of the knee joint.

Authors:  Philipp Niemeyer; Jan M Pestka; Peter C Kreuz; Christoph Erggelet; Hagen Schmal; Norbert P Suedkamp; Matthias Steinwachs
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Complications in knee arthroscopy.

Authors:  Ole Reigstad; Christian Grimsgaard
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2005-10-06       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  A prospective randomized clinical study of mosaic osteochondral autologous transplantation versus microfracture for the treatment of osteochondral defects in the knee joint in young athletes.

Authors:  Rimtautas Gudas; Romas J Kalesinskas; Vytautas Kimtys; Edgaras Stankevicius; Vytautas Toliusis; Giedrius Bernotavicius; Alfredas Smailys
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries.

Authors:  Y Tegner; J Lysholm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Is microfracture of chondral defects in the knee associated with different results in patients aged 40 years or younger?

Authors:  Peter C Kreuz; Christoph Erggelet; Matthias R Steinwachs; Stefanie J Krause; Andreas Lahm; Philipp Niemeyer; Nadir Ghanem; Markus Uhl; Norbert Südkamp
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  Patient satisfaction and outcome after microfracture of the degenerative knee.

Authors:  Bruce S Miller; J Richard Steadman; Karen K Briggs; Juan J Rodrigo; William G Rodkey
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.757

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Chondral and osteochondral operative treatment in early osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Peter Angele; Philipp Niemeyer; Matthias Steinwachs; Giuseppe Filardo; Andreas H Gomoll; Elizaveta Kon; Johannes Zellner; Henning Madry
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Early resumption of physical activities leads to inferior clinical outcomes after matrix-based autologous chondrocyte implantation in the knee.

Authors:  Thomas R Niethammer; Peter E Müller; Elem Safi; Andreas Ficklscherer; Björn P Roßbach; Volkmar Jansson; Matthias F Pietschmann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Microfracture for cartilage repair in the knee: a systematic review of the contemporary literature.

Authors:  Patrick Orth; Liang Gao; Henning Madry
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Promoting endogenous articular cartilage regeneration using extracellular matrix scaffolds.

Authors:  David C Browe; Ross Burdis; Pedro J Díaz-Payno; Fiona E Freeman; Jessica M Nulty; Conor T Buckley; Pieter A J Brama; Daniel J Kelly
Journal:  Mater Today Bio       Date:  2022-07-05

5.  Alignment does not influence cartilage T2 in asymptomatic knee joints.

Authors:  M Sauerschnig; J S Bauer; L Kohn; S Hinterwimmer; S Landwehr; K Woertler; P M Jungmann; W Koestler; P Niemeyer; A B Imhoff; G M Salzmann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Accurate Reporting of Concomitant Procedures Is Highly Variable in Studies Investigating Knee Cartilage Restoration.

Authors:  William L Sheppard; Betina B Hinckel; Armin Arshi; Seth L Sherman; Kristofer J Jones
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Does Gender Influence Outcome in Cartilage Repair Surgery? An Analysis of 4,968 Consecutive Patients from the German Cartilage Registry (Knorpel Register DGOU).

Authors:  Svea Faber; Wolfgang Zinser; Peter Angele; Gunter Spahn; Ingo Löer; Johannes Zellner; Alfred Hochrein; Philipp Niemeyer
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 8.  How to Manage a Failed Cartilage Repair: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Donato Rosa; Sigismondo Luca Di Donato; Giovanni Balato; Alessio D'Addona; Francesco Smeraglia; Gaetano Correra; Gianni Di Vico
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2017-07-28

9.  Advancing osteochondral tissue engineering: bone morphogenetic protein, transforming growth factor, and fibroblast growth factor signaling drive ordered differentiation of periosteal cells resulting in stable cartilage and bone formation in vivo.

Authors:  L F Mendes; H Katagiri; W L Tam; Y C Chai; L Geris; S J Roberts; F P Luyten
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 6.832

10.  Abrasion arthroplasty increases mesenchymal stem cell content of postoperative joint effusions.

Authors:  Rainer Beckmann; Sebastian Lippross; Claudia Hartz; Mersedeh Tohidnezhad; Mónica S Ventura Ferreira; Sabine Neuss-Stein; Andreas Seekamp; Sven Nebelung; Nisreen Kweider; Björn Rath; Holger Jahr; Thomas Pufe; Deike J Varoga
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-09-12       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.