PURPOSE: Matrix-based autologous chondrocyte implantation is a well-established operation procedure for full cartilage defects. When to resume physical activity after matrix-based autologous chondrocyte implantation is controversial. Our hypothesis was that early resumption of physical activity leads to a worse clinical outcome after matrix-based autologous chondrocyte implantation in the knee two years post-operatively. Physical activity is defined as any kind of impact sport. METHODS: Forty-four patients with cartilage defects of the knee were treated with matrix-based autologous chondrocyte implantation (Novocart3D). All patients were assessed preoperatively and after a period of 24 months with the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity score. The return to physical activities or sports after matrix-based autologous chondrocyte implantation was documented. Patients were evaluated using the International Knee Documentation Committee Knee Examination Form and visual analogue scale for pain after 6, 12 and 24 months. RESULTS: Fifty-five percent showed an unchanged level of physical activity in the UCLA Activity score post-operatively. About 35% showed a lower level and 10% a higher level of physical activity. The average return to physical activities or sports after matrix-based autologous chondrocyte implantation procedure was 10.2 months. Patients with a later return of sports after 12 months showed significantly better clinical results after two years. In particular, patients who started practicing impact sport after 12 months post-operatively showed significantly better results. CONCLUSION: Resuming physical activity including impact sports without waiting at least 12 months after the operation leads to inferior outcomes up to 24 months after matrix-based autologous chondrocyte implantation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.
PURPOSE: Matrix-based autologous chondrocyte implantation is a well-established operation procedure for full cartilage defects. When to resume physical activity after matrix-based autologous chondrocyte implantation is controversial. Our hypothesis was that early resumption of physical activity leads to a worse clinical outcome after matrix-based autologous chondrocyte implantation in the knee two years post-operatively. Physical activity is defined as any kind of impact sport. METHODS: Forty-four patients with cartilage defects of the knee were treated with matrix-based autologous chondrocyte implantation (Novocart3D). All patients were assessed preoperatively and after a period of 24 months with the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity score. The return to physical activities or sports after matrix-based autologous chondrocyte implantation was documented. Patients were evaluated using the International Knee Documentation Committee Knee Examination Form and visual analogue scale for pain after 6, 12 and 24 months. RESULTS: Fifty-five percent showed an unchanged level of physical activity in the UCLA Activity score post-operatively. About 35% showed a lower level and 10% a higher level of physical activity. The average return to physical activities or sports after matrix-based autologous chondrocyte implantation procedure was 10.2 months. Patients with a later return of sports after 12 months showed significantly better clinical results after two years. In particular, patients who started practicing impact sport after 12 months post-operatively showed significantly better results. CONCLUSION: Resuming physical activity including impact sports without waiting at least 12 months after the operation leads to inferior outcomes up to 24 months after matrix-based autologous chondrocyte implantation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.
Authors: Peter Cornelius Kreuz; Matthias Steinwachs; Christoph Erggelet; Andreas Lahm; Philipp Henle; Philipp Niemeyer Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2005-09-12 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Karen Hambly; Vladimir Bobic; Barbara Wondrasch; Dieter Van Assche; Stefan Marlovits Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2006-01-25 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Philipp Niemeyer; Jan M Pestka; Peter C Kreuz; Christoph Erggelet; Hagen Schmal; Norbert P Suedkamp; Matthias Steinwachs Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2008-09-18 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: P Behrens; U Bosch; J Bruns; C Erggelet; S A Esenwein; C Gaissmaier; T Krackhardt; J Löhnert; S Marlovits; N M Meenen; J Mollenhauer; S Nehrer; F U Niethard; U Nöth; C Perka; W Richter; D Schäfer; U Schneider; M Steinwachs; K Weise Journal: Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb Date: 2004 Sep-Oct
Authors: Thomas R Niethammer; Thomas Niethammer; Siegfried Valentin; Andreas Ficklscherer; Mehmet F Gülecyüz; Mehmet Gülecyüz; Matthias F Pietschmann; Matthias Pietschmann; Peter E Müller; Peter Müller Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2015-05-07 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Jennifer S Howard; Carl G Mattacola; David R Mullineaux; Robert A English; Christian Lattermann Journal: J Sport Rehabil Date: 2014-02-28 Impact factor: 1.931
Authors: Johannes Holz; Tim Spalding; Tarek Boutefnouchet; Pieter Emans; Karl Eriksson; Mats Brittberg; Lars Konradsen; Clemens Kösters; Peter Verdonk; Magnus Högström; Martin Lind Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2020-10-06 Impact factor: 4.114