OBJECTIVE: To assess 3-dimensional scapulothoracic and glenohumeral kinematics between subjects with spinal cord injury and disease (SCI/D) with and without shoulder pain during a weight-relief raise and transfer task. DESIGN: Case-control, repeated-measures analysis of variance. SETTING: Movement analysis laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects (N=43; 23 with clinical signs of impingement and 20 without) between 21 and 65 years of age, at least 1 year after SCI/D (range, 1-43y) resulting in American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale T2 motor neurologic level or below, and requiring the full-time use of a manual wheelchair. INTERVENTIONS: Weight-relief raises and transfer tasks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: An electromagnetic tracking system acquired 3-dimensional position and orientation of the thorax, scapula, and humerus. Dependent variables included angular values for scapular upward and downward rotation, posterior and anterior tilt, and internal and external rotation relative to the thorax, and glenohumeral internal and external rotation relative to the scapula. The mean of 3 trials was collected, and angular values were compared at 3 distinct phases of the weight-relief raise and transfer activity. Comparisons were also made between transfer direction (lead vs trail arm) and across groups. RESULTS: Key findings include significantly increased scapular upward rotation for the pain group during transfer (P=.03). Significant group differences were found for the trailing arm at the lift pivot (phase 2) of the transfer, with the pain group having greater anterior tilt (mean difference ± SE, 5.7°±2.8°). The direction of transfer also influenced kinematics at the different phases of the activity. CONCLUSIONS: Potentially detrimental magnitude and direction of scapular and glenohumeral kinematics during weight-bearing tasks may pose increased risk for shoulder pain or injury in persons with SCI/D. Consideration should be given to rehabilitation strategies that promote favorable scapular kinematics and glenohumeral external rotation.
OBJECTIVE: To assess 3-dimensional scapulothoracic and glenohumeral kinematics between subjects with spinal cord injury and disease (SCI/D) with and without shoulder pain during a weight-relief raise and transfer task. DESIGN: Case-control, repeated-measures analysis of variance. SETTING: Movement analysis laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects (N=43; 23 with clinical signs of impingement and 20 without) between 21 and 65 years of age, at least 1 year after SCI/D (range, 1-43y) resulting in American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale T2 motor neurologic level or below, and requiring the full-time use of a manual wheelchair. INTERVENTIONS: Weight-relief raises and transfer tasks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: An electromagnetic tracking system acquired 3-dimensional position and orientation of the thorax, scapula, and humerus. Dependent variables included angular values for scapular upward and downward rotation, posterior and anterior tilt, and internal and external rotation relative to the thorax, and glenohumeral internal and external rotation relative to the scapula. The mean of 3 trials was collected, and angular values were compared at 3 distinct phases of the weight-relief raise and transfer activity. Comparisons were also made between transfer direction (lead vs trail arm) and across groups. RESULTS: Key findings include significantly increased scapular upward rotation for the pain group during transfer (P=.03). Significant group differences were found for the trailing arm at the lift pivot (phase 2) of the transfer, with the pain group having greater anterior tilt (mean difference ± SE, 5.7°±2.8°). The direction of transfer also influenced kinematics at the different phases of the activity. CONCLUSIONS: Potentially detrimental magnitude and direction of scapular and glenohumeral kinematics during weight-bearing tasks may pose increased risk for shoulder pain or injury in persons with SCI/D. Consideration should be given to rehabilitation strategies that promote favorable scapular kinematics and glenohumeral external rotation.
Authors: Joseph D Mozingo; Mohsen Akbari-Shandiz; Naveen S Murthy; Meegan G Van Straaten; Beth A Schueler; David R Holmes; Cynthia H McCollough; Kristin D Zhao Journal: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) Date: 2019-10-20 Impact factor: 2.063
Authors: Beth A Cloud; Kristin D Zhao; Arin M Ellingson; Ahmad Nassr; Anthony J Windebank; Kai-Nan An Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2017-03-18 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: A Gil-Agudo; M S Mozos; B Crespo-Ruiz; A J del-Ama; E Pérez-Rizo; A Segura-Fragoso; F Jiménez-Díaz Journal: Spinal Cord Date: 2015-08-18 Impact factor: 2.772
Authors: Joseph D Mozingo; Mohsen Akbari-Shandiz; Meegan G Van Straaten; Naveen S Murthy; Beth A Schueler; David R Holmes; Cynthia H McCollough; Kristin D Zhao Journal: J Electromyogr Kinesiol Date: 2019-08-23 Impact factor: 2.368
Authors: Kristin D Zhao; Meegan G Van Straaten; Beth A Cloud; Melissa M Morrow; Kai-Nan An; Paula M Ludewig Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol Date: 2015-11-20